基于时频分析和深度学习的LPI雷达分类技术的时间和精度权衡

Junsang Yoo, Yun Suk Cho, Chang-Joo Kim, Heeyul Choi, Youngsik Kim
{"title":"基于时频分析和深度学习的LPI雷达分类技术的时间和精度权衡","authors":"Junsang Yoo, Yun Suk Cho, Chang-Joo Kim, Heeyul Choi, Youngsik Kim","doi":"10.5515/kjkiees.2022.34.1.25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Technology for classifying low probability of intercept (LPI) radar signals with speed and accuracy is critical for cognitive communication research. We used time-frequency analysis (TFA) and deep learning to classify 12 typical LPI radar signals. Traditional methods use the Choi-Williams distribution (CWD), which requires more than 500 times longer TFA generation time than the spectrogram method. In this paper, we show the trade-off relationship between classification accuracy and detection time using a spectrogram, Wigner-Ville distribution (WVD), and CWD as the training datasets. As a result, the CWD model showed higher accuracy than the spectrogram model, but the prediction time was more than 200 times longer. The accuracy difference was only 1 %p for an SNR over −2 dB, but it reached 7.5%p for an SNR of −10 dB. Therefore, a lower SNR shows a distinct trade-off between prediction time and accuracy, depending on the type of TFA.","PeriodicalId":55817,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Korean Institute of Electromagnetic Engineering and Science","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Time and Accuracy Trade-Off of LPI Radar Classification Technology Based on Time-Frequency Analysis and Deep Learning\",\"authors\":\"Junsang Yoo, Yun Suk Cho, Chang-Joo Kim, Heeyul Choi, Youngsik Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.5515/kjkiees.2022.34.1.25\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Technology for classifying low probability of intercept (LPI) radar signals with speed and accuracy is critical for cognitive communication research. We used time-frequency analysis (TFA) and deep learning to classify 12 typical LPI radar signals. Traditional methods use the Choi-Williams distribution (CWD), which requires more than 500 times longer TFA generation time than the spectrogram method. In this paper, we show the trade-off relationship between classification accuracy and detection time using a spectrogram, Wigner-Ville distribution (WVD), and CWD as the training datasets. As a result, the CWD model showed higher accuracy than the spectrogram model, but the prediction time was more than 200 times longer. The accuracy difference was only 1 %p for an SNR over −2 dB, but it reached 7.5%p for an SNR of −10 dB. Therefore, a lower SNR shows a distinct trade-off between prediction time and accuracy, depending on the type of TFA.\",\"PeriodicalId\":55817,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Korean Institute of Electromagnetic Engineering and Science\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Korean Institute of Electromagnetic Engineering and Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5515/kjkiees.2022.34.1.25\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Korean Institute of Electromagnetic Engineering and Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5515/kjkiees.2022.34.1.25","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

快速准确地对低截获概率雷达信号进行分类是认知通信研究的关键。我们使用时频分析(TFA)和深度学习对12个典型的LPI雷达信号进行分类。传统方法使用Choi-Williams分布(CWD),其TFA生成时间比谱图方法长500倍以上。本文使用谱图、Wigner-Ville分布(WVD)和CWD作为训练数据集,展示了分类精度和检测时间之间的权衡关系。结果表明,CWD模型比谱图模型精度更高,但预测时间要长200倍以上。当信噪比大于- 2 dB时,准确度差仅为1% p,但当信噪比为- 10 dB时,准确度差达到7.5%p。因此,较低的信噪比显示了预测时间和准确性之间的明显权衡,这取决于TFA的类型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Time and Accuracy Trade-Off of LPI Radar Classification Technology Based on Time-Frequency Analysis and Deep Learning
Technology for classifying low probability of intercept (LPI) radar signals with speed and accuracy is critical for cognitive communication research. We used time-frequency analysis (TFA) and deep learning to classify 12 typical LPI radar signals. Traditional methods use the Choi-Williams distribution (CWD), which requires more than 500 times longer TFA generation time than the spectrogram method. In this paper, we show the trade-off relationship between classification accuracy and detection time using a spectrogram, Wigner-Ville distribution (WVD), and CWD as the training datasets. As a result, the CWD model showed higher accuracy than the spectrogram model, but the prediction time was more than 200 times longer. The accuracy difference was only 1 %p for an SNR over −2 dB, but it reached 7.5%p for an SNR of −10 dB. Therefore, a lower SNR shows a distinct trade-off between prediction time and accuracy, depending on the type of TFA.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
3 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信