风险承担者:发展和维持反脆弱教师的PDS合作伙伴

Lianne Jones, Rachelle Rogers, Doug Rogers, Austin McClinton, Lisa Painter
{"title":"风险承担者:发展和维持反脆弱教师的PDS合作伙伴","authors":"Lianne Jones, Rachelle Rogers, Doug Rogers, Austin McClinton, Lisa Painter","doi":"10.1108/sup-04-2023-0018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose The ever-changing educational landscape, exacerbated by recent events surrounding COVID, political and cultural unrest, necessitates educators who are antifragile, able to withstand pressures and thrive amidst uncertainty. To this end, the pilot study reported here aims to examine mathematics educators’ initial reflections on what it means to be a risk-taker in the classroom, what prevents them from engaging in instructional risks and what would support their instructional risk-taking. Design/methodology/approach The pilot study utilized interviews with participants, including four pre-service teachers who were enrolled at the university and seven in-service teachers who were employed on active PDS campuses within the school district. Findings Preliminary findings suggest teacher beliefs concerning risk-taking, the barriers to engaging in such behaviors and the support needed to be able to take instructional risks. Results highlight the role of school–university partnerships in cultivating a culture of risk-taking through active collaboration and dialogue. Research limitations/implications These findings have important implications for universities and PDS partners engaged in preparing teachers for an educational field that is unpredictable and continually changing. Additional research should be completed in varying PDS settings. Practical implications Findings highlight the role of school–university partnerships in cultivating a culture of risk-taking through active collaboration and dialogue. Originality/value Educators are currently faced with an unprecedented instructional landscape. Antifragile, risk-taking teachers are needed who are adaptable and innovative, thus better equipped to enter the challenging and uncertain realities of education.","PeriodicalId":358031,"journal":{"name":"School-University Partnerships","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Risk takers: PDS partners developing and sustaining antifragile teachers\",\"authors\":\"Lianne Jones, Rachelle Rogers, Doug Rogers, Austin McClinton, Lisa Painter\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/sup-04-2023-0018\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose The ever-changing educational landscape, exacerbated by recent events surrounding COVID, political and cultural unrest, necessitates educators who are antifragile, able to withstand pressures and thrive amidst uncertainty. To this end, the pilot study reported here aims to examine mathematics educators’ initial reflections on what it means to be a risk-taker in the classroom, what prevents them from engaging in instructional risks and what would support their instructional risk-taking. Design/methodology/approach The pilot study utilized interviews with participants, including four pre-service teachers who were enrolled at the university and seven in-service teachers who were employed on active PDS campuses within the school district. Findings Preliminary findings suggest teacher beliefs concerning risk-taking, the barriers to engaging in such behaviors and the support needed to be able to take instructional risks. Results highlight the role of school–university partnerships in cultivating a culture of risk-taking through active collaboration and dialogue. Research limitations/implications These findings have important implications for universities and PDS partners engaged in preparing teachers for an educational field that is unpredictable and continually changing. Additional research should be completed in varying PDS settings. Practical implications Findings highlight the role of school–university partnerships in cultivating a culture of risk-taking through active collaboration and dialogue. Originality/value Educators are currently faced with an unprecedented instructional landscape. Antifragile, risk-taking teachers are needed who are adaptable and innovative, thus better equipped to enter the challenging and uncertain realities of education.\",\"PeriodicalId\":358031,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"School-University Partnerships\",\"volume\":\"37 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"School-University Partnerships\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/sup-04-2023-0018\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"School-University Partnerships","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/sup-04-2023-0018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

不断变化的教育形势,加上最近围绕新冠肺炎的事件、政治和文化动荡加剧,需要具有抗脆弱性、能够承受压力并在不确定性中茁壮成长的教育工作者。为此,本文报告的试点研究旨在检验数学教育者对课堂上的冒险者意味着什么,是什么阻止他们参与教学风险,以及什么会支持他们的教学风险的最初思考。设计/方法/方法试点研究采用了对参与者的访谈,其中包括4名在大学注册的职前教师和7名在学区内活跃的PDS校园工作的在职教师。初步调查结果表明,教师对冒险行为的看法,参与这种行为的障碍以及能够承担教学风险所需的支持。研究结果突出了学校-大学伙伴关系在通过积极合作和对话培养冒险文化方面的作用。这些发现对大学和PDS合作伙伴具有重要意义,这些合作伙伴致力于为不可预测和不断变化的教育领域培养教师。应在不同的PDS环境下完成进一步的研究。研究结果强调了学校-大学伙伴关系在通过积极合作和对话培养冒险文化方面的作用。教育工作者目前面临着一个前所未有的教学环境。我们需要具有抗脆弱性和冒险精神的教师,他们具有适应能力和创新能力,从而能够更好地应对充满挑战和不确定的教育现实。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Risk takers: PDS partners developing and sustaining antifragile teachers
Purpose The ever-changing educational landscape, exacerbated by recent events surrounding COVID, political and cultural unrest, necessitates educators who are antifragile, able to withstand pressures and thrive amidst uncertainty. To this end, the pilot study reported here aims to examine mathematics educators’ initial reflections on what it means to be a risk-taker in the classroom, what prevents them from engaging in instructional risks and what would support their instructional risk-taking. Design/methodology/approach The pilot study utilized interviews with participants, including four pre-service teachers who were enrolled at the university and seven in-service teachers who were employed on active PDS campuses within the school district. Findings Preliminary findings suggest teacher beliefs concerning risk-taking, the barriers to engaging in such behaviors and the support needed to be able to take instructional risks. Results highlight the role of school–university partnerships in cultivating a culture of risk-taking through active collaboration and dialogue. Research limitations/implications These findings have important implications for universities and PDS partners engaged in preparing teachers for an educational field that is unpredictable and continually changing. Additional research should be completed in varying PDS settings. Practical implications Findings highlight the role of school–university partnerships in cultivating a culture of risk-taking through active collaboration and dialogue. Originality/value Educators are currently faced with an unprecedented instructional landscape. Antifragile, risk-taking teachers are needed who are adaptable and innovative, thus better equipped to enter the challenging and uncertain realities of education.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信