DLGAP2附近DNA甲基化可能介导1型糖尿病家族史与1型糖尿病风险的关系

IF 4.3 3区 材料科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC
Randi K. Johnson, Amanda J. Ireton, Patrick M. Carry, Lauren A. Vanderlinden, Fran Dong, Alex Romero, David R. Johnson, Debashis Ghosh, Fan Yang, Brigitte Frohnert, Ivana V. Yang, Katerina Kechris, Marian Rewers, Jill M. Norris
{"title":"DLGAP2附近DNA甲基化可能介导1型糖尿病家族史与1型糖尿病风险的关系","authors":"Randi K. Johnson, Amanda J. Ireton, Patrick M. Carry, Lauren A. Vanderlinden, Fran Dong, Alex Romero, David R. Johnson, Debashis Ghosh, Fan Yang, Brigitte Frohnert, Ivana V. Yang, Katerina Kechris, Marian Rewers, Jill M. Norris","doi":"10.1155/2023/5367637","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Given the differential risk of type 1 diabetes (T1D) in offspring of affected fathers versus affected mothers and our observation that T1D cases have differential DNA methylation near the imprinted DLGAP2 gene compared to controls, we examined whether methylation near DLGAP2 mediates the association between T1D family history and T1D risk. In a nested case–control study of 87 T1D cases and 87 controls from the Diabetes Autoimmunity Study in the Young, we conducted causal mediation analyses at 12 DLGAP2 region CpGs to decompose the effect of family history on T1D risk into indirect and direct effects. These effects were estimated from two regression models adjusted for the human leukocyte antigen DR3/4 genotype: a linear regression of family history on methylation (mediator model) and a logistic regression of family history and methylation on T1D (outcome model). For 8 of the 12 CpGs, we identified a significant interaction between T1D family history and methylation on T1D risk. Accounting for this interaction, we found that the increased risk of T1D for children with affected mothers compared to those with no family history was mediated through differences in methylation at two CpGs (cg27351978, cg00565786) in the DLGAP2 region, as demonstrated by a significant pure natural indirect effect (odds ratio (OR) = 1.98, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.06–3.71) and nonsignificant total natural direct effect (OR = 1.65, 95% CI: 0.16–16.62) (for cg00565786). In contrast, the increased risk of T1D for children with an affected father or sibling was not explained by DNA methylation changes at these CpGs. Results were similar for cg27351978 and robust in sensitivity analyses. Lastly, we found that DNA methylation in the DLGAP2 region was associated ( <math xmlns=\"http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML\" id=\"M1\"> <mi>P</mi> <mo><</mo> <mn>0.05</mn> </math> ) with gene expression of nearby protein-coding genes DLGAP2, ARHGEF10, ZNF596, and ERICH1. Results indicate that the maternal protective effect conferred through exposure to T1D in utero may operate through changes to DNA methylation that have functional downstream consequences.","PeriodicalId":3,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"DNA Methylation Near DLGAP2 May Mediate the Relationship between Family History of Type 1 Diabetes and Type 1 Diabetes Risk\",\"authors\":\"Randi K. Johnson, Amanda J. Ireton, Patrick M. Carry, Lauren A. Vanderlinden, Fran Dong, Alex Romero, David R. Johnson, Debashis Ghosh, Fan Yang, Brigitte Frohnert, Ivana V. Yang, Katerina Kechris, Marian Rewers, Jill M. Norris\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2023/5367637\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Given the differential risk of type 1 diabetes (T1D) in offspring of affected fathers versus affected mothers and our observation that T1D cases have differential DNA methylation near the imprinted DLGAP2 gene compared to controls, we examined whether methylation near DLGAP2 mediates the association between T1D family history and T1D risk. In a nested case–control study of 87 T1D cases and 87 controls from the Diabetes Autoimmunity Study in the Young, we conducted causal mediation analyses at 12 DLGAP2 region CpGs to decompose the effect of family history on T1D risk into indirect and direct effects. These effects were estimated from two regression models adjusted for the human leukocyte antigen DR3/4 genotype: a linear regression of family history on methylation (mediator model) and a logistic regression of family history and methylation on T1D (outcome model). For 8 of the 12 CpGs, we identified a significant interaction between T1D family history and methylation on T1D risk. Accounting for this interaction, we found that the increased risk of T1D for children with affected mothers compared to those with no family history was mediated through differences in methylation at two CpGs (cg27351978, cg00565786) in the DLGAP2 region, as demonstrated by a significant pure natural indirect effect (odds ratio (OR) = 1.98, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.06–3.71) and nonsignificant total natural direct effect (OR = 1.65, 95% CI: 0.16–16.62) (for cg00565786). In contrast, the increased risk of T1D for children with an affected father or sibling was not explained by DNA methylation changes at these CpGs. Results were similar for cg27351978 and robust in sensitivity analyses. Lastly, we found that DNA methylation in the DLGAP2 region was associated ( <math xmlns=\\\"http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML\\\" id=\\\"M1\\\"> <mi>P</mi> <mo><</mo> <mn>0.05</mn> </math> ) with gene expression of nearby protein-coding genes DLGAP2, ARHGEF10, ZNF596, and ERICH1. Results indicate that the maternal protective effect conferred through exposure to T1D in utero may operate through changes to DNA methylation that have functional downstream consequences.\",\"PeriodicalId\":3,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Electronic Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Electronic Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/5367637\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"材料科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/5367637","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

考虑到受影响父亲与受影响母亲的后代患1型糖尿病(T1D)的风险差异,以及我们观察到T1D病例与对照组相比,印迹DLGAP2基因附近的DNA甲基化存在差异,我们研究了DLGAP2基因附近的甲基化是否介导了T1D家族史与T1D风险之间的关联。在青年人糖尿病自身免疫研究的87例T1D病例和87例对照病例的巢式病例对照研究中,我们对12个DLGAP2区域CpGs进行了因果中介分析,将家族史对T1D风险的影响分解为间接和直接影响。这些影响通过对人类白细胞抗原DR3/4基因型进行调整的两个回归模型进行估计:甲基化家族史的线性回归(中介模型)和T1D家族史和甲基化的逻辑回归(结果模型)。对于12个CpGs中的8个,我们发现T1D家族史和甲基化对T1D风险有显著的相互作用。考虑到这种相互作用,我们发现,与没有家族史的儿童相比,受影响母亲的儿童患T1D的风险增加是通过DLGAP2区域两个CpGs (cg27351978, cg00565786)的甲基化差异介导的,证明了显著的纯天然间接效应(优势比(OR) = 1.98, 95%置信区间(CI): 1.06-3.71)和不显著的总自然直接效应(OR = 1.65, 95% CI: 0.16-16.62) (cg00565786)。相比之下,有患病父亲或兄弟姐妹的儿童患T1D的风险增加并不能用这些CpGs的DNA甲基化变化来解释。cg27351978的结果相似,敏感性分析稳健。最后,我们发现DLGAP2区域的DNA甲基化与(P <0.05),附近蛋白编码基因DLGAP2、ARHGEF10、ZNF596和ERICH1的基因表达。研究结果表明,母体在子宫内暴露于T1D所产生的保护作用可能通过DNA甲基化的改变而起作用,这种改变具有功能性的下游后果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
DNA Methylation Near DLGAP2 May Mediate the Relationship between Family History of Type 1 Diabetes and Type 1 Diabetes Risk
Given the differential risk of type 1 diabetes (T1D) in offspring of affected fathers versus affected mothers and our observation that T1D cases have differential DNA methylation near the imprinted DLGAP2 gene compared to controls, we examined whether methylation near DLGAP2 mediates the association between T1D family history and T1D risk. In a nested case–control study of 87 T1D cases and 87 controls from the Diabetes Autoimmunity Study in the Young, we conducted causal mediation analyses at 12 DLGAP2 region CpGs to decompose the effect of family history on T1D risk into indirect and direct effects. These effects were estimated from two regression models adjusted for the human leukocyte antigen DR3/4 genotype: a linear regression of family history on methylation (mediator model) and a logistic regression of family history and methylation on T1D (outcome model). For 8 of the 12 CpGs, we identified a significant interaction between T1D family history and methylation on T1D risk. Accounting for this interaction, we found that the increased risk of T1D for children with affected mothers compared to those with no family history was mediated through differences in methylation at two CpGs (cg27351978, cg00565786) in the DLGAP2 region, as demonstrated by a significant pure natural indirect effect (odds ratio (OR) = 1.98, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.06–3.71) and nonsignificant total natural direct effect (OR = 1.65, 95% CI: 0.16–16.62) (for cg00565786). In contrast, the increased risk of T1D for children with an affected father or sibling was not explained by DNA methylation changes at these CpGs. Results were similar for cg27351978 and robust in sensitivity analyses. Lastly, we found that DNA methylation in the DLGAP2 region was associated ( P < 0.05 ) with gene expression of nearby protein-coding genes DLGAP2, ARHGEF10, ZNF596, and ERICH1. Results indicate that the maternal protective effect conferred through exposure to T1D in utero may operate through changes to DNA methylation that have functional downstream consequences.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
567
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信