数据驱动的滑翔伞避险着陆:一种深度强化学习方法

IF 1.3 4区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, AEROSPACE
Junwoo Park, Hyochoong Bang
{"title":"数据驱动的滑翔伞避险着陆:一种深度强化学习方法","authors":"Junwoo Park, Hyochoong Bang","doi":"10.2514/1.i011281","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper examines a couple of realizations of autonomous landing hazard avoidance technology of parafoil: a reinforcement-learning-based approach and a rule-based approach, advocating the former. Furthermore, comparative advantages and behavioral analogies between the two approaches are presented. In the data-driven approach, a decision process observing only a series of nadir-pointing images is designed without explicit augmentation of vehicle dynamics for the homogeneity of observation data. An agent then learns the hazard avoidance steering law in an end-to-end fashion. On the contrary, the rule-based approach is facilitated via explicit notions of guidance-control hierarchy, vehicle dynamic states, and metric details of ground obstacles. The soft actor–critic method is applied to learn a policy that maps the down-looking images to parafoil brakes, whereas a vector field guidance law is employed in the rule-based approach, considering each hazard as a repulsive source. This paper then presents empirical equivalences in designing both approaches and their distinctions. Numerical experiments in multiple test cases validate the reinforcement learning method and present comparisons between the approaches regarding their resultant trajectories. The interesting behaviors of the resultant policy of the data-driven approach are emphasized.","PeriodicalId":50260,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Aerospace Information Systems","volume":"2 2","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Data-Driven Hazard Avoidance Landing of Parafoil: A Deep Reinforcement Learning Approach\",\"authors\":\"Junwoo Park, Hyochoong Bang\",\"doi\":\"10.2514/1.i011281\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper examines a couple of realizations of autonomous landing hazard avoidance technology of parafoil: a reinforcement-learning-based approach and a rule-based approach, advocating the former. Furthermore, comparative advantages and behavioral analogies between the two approaches are presented. In the data-driven approach, a decision process observing only a series of nadir-pointing images is designed without explicit augmentation of vehicle dynamics for the homogeneity of observation data. An agent then learns the hazard avoidance steering law in an end-to-end fashion. On the contrary, the rule-based approach is facilitated via explicit notions of guidance-control hierarchy, vehicle dynamic states, and metric details of ground obstacles. The soft actor–critic method is applied to learn a policy that maps the down-looking images to parafoil brakes, whereas a vector field guidance law is employed in the rule-based approach, considering each hazard as a repulsive source. This paper then presents empirical equivalences in designing both approaches and their distinctions. Numerical experiments in multiple test cases validate the reinforcement learning method and present comparisons between the approaches regarding their resultant trajectories. The interesting behaviors of the resultant policy of the data-driven approach are emphasized.\",\"PeriodicalId\":50260,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Aerospace Information Systems\",\"volume\":\"2 2\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Aerospace Information Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2514/1.i011281\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, AEROSPACE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Aerospace Information Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2514/1.i011281","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, AEROSPACE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文研究了伞翼自主着陆避险技术的两种实现方法:基于强化学习的方法和基于规则的方法,并提倡前者。此外,还介绍了两种方法的比较优势和行为类比。在数据驱动方法中,设计了一个仅观察一系列最低点图像的决策过程,而没有明确增强观测数据的均匀性。然后,智能体以端到端的方式学习避免危险的转向律。相反,基于规则的方法通过明确的制导控制层次、车辆动态状态和地面障碍物度量细节的概念来促进。采用软行为者-评论家方法学习将向下看图像映射到伞翼制动器的策略,而在基于规则的方法中采用矢量场制导律,将每个危险视为排斥源。然后,本文介绍了设计这两种方法的经验等价性及其区别。在多个测试用例中进行的数值实验验证了强化学习方法,并对其结果轨迹进行了比较。强调了数据驱动方法的结果策略的有趣行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Data-Driven Hazard Avoidance Landing of Parafoil: A Deep Reinforcement Learning Approach
This paper examines a couple of realizations of autonomous landing hazard avoidance technology of parafoil: a reinforcement-learning-based approach and a rule-based approach, advocating the former. Furthermore, comparative advantages and behavioral analogies between the two approaches are presented. In the data-driven approach, a decision process observing only a series of nadir-pointing images is designed without explicit augmentation of vehicle dynamics for the homogeneity of observation data. An agent then learns the hazard avoidance steering law in an end-to-end fashion. On the contrary, the rule-based approach is facilitated via explicit notions of guidance-control hierarchy, vehicle dynamic states, and metric details of ground obstacles. The soft actor–critic method is applied to learn a policy that maps the down-looking images to parafoil brakes, whereas a vector field guidance law is employed in the rule-based approach, considering each hazard as a repulsive source. This paper then presents empirical equivalences in designing both approaches and their distinctions. Numerical experiments in multiple test cases validate the reinforcement learning method and present comparisons between the approaches regarding their resultant trajectories. The interesting behaviors of the resultant policy of the data-driven approach are emphasized.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
13.30%
发文量
58
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: This Journal is devoted to the dissemination of original archival research papers describing new theoretical developments, novel applications, and case studies regarding advances in aerospace computing, information, and networks and communication systems that address aerospace-specific issues. Issues related to signal processing, electromagnetics, antenna theory, and the basic networking hardware transmission technologies of a network are not within the scope of this journal. Topics include aerospace systems and software engineering; verification and validation of embedded systems; the field known as ‘big data,’ data analytics, machine learning, and knowledge management for aerospace systems; human-automation interaction and systems health management for aerospace systems. Applications of autonomous systems, systems engineering principles, and safety and mission assurance are of particular interest. The Journal also features Technical Notes that discuss particular technical innovations or applications in the topics described above. Papers are also sought that rigorously review the results of recent research developments. In addition to original research papers and reviews, the journal publishes articles that review books, conferences, social media, and new educational modes applicable to the scope of the Journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信