提高英语写作能力:对语法应用效果的评价

IF 0.6 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS
Rizky Eka Prasetya, Didik Hariyadi Raharjo
{"title":"提高英语写作能力:对语法应用效果的评价","authors":"Rizky Eka Prasetya, Didik Hariyadi Raharjo","doi":"10.30870/jels.v8i2.19294","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study investigated the effectiveness of using the Grammarly application in teaching English language writing skills. A mixed-methods approach was utilised to collect data from 100 English language learners with diverse backgrounds and levels of proficiency. Participants were randomly assigned to either an experimental group that used Grammarly or a control group that received traditional writing instruction. The study collected quantitative and qualitative data, including pre-and post-test assessments of writing skills and surveys and interviews exploring participants' perceptions of Grammarly. Quantitative data analysis showed a significant improvement in the experimental group's writing skills regarding grammatical accuracy, vocabulary use, and overall writing quality. The effect size was also calculated to determine the magnitude of the difference between the two groups. Qualitative data analysis revealed that participants positively perceived Grammarly, including its user-friendliness and ability to provide personalized feedback. The findings suggest that Grammarly effectively teaches English language writing skills and can supplement traditional writing instruction. The study provides insights into the benefits and limitations of Grammarly and its potential impact on English language learners' writing skills. This research contributes to the ongoing discussion on integrating technology in language learning and provides implications for language instructors and developers of writing applications.","PeriodicalId":44950,"journal":{"name":"3L-Language Linguistics Literature-The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Enhancing English Language Writing Skills: An Evaluation of the Efficacy of Grammarly Application\",\"authors\":\"Rizky Eka Prasetya, Didik Hariyadi Raharjo\",\"doi\":\"10.30870/jels.v8i2.19294\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study investigated the effectiveness of using the Grammarly application in teaching English language writing skills. A mixed-methods approach was utilised to collect data from 100 English language learners with diverse backgrounds and levels of proficiency. Participants were randomly assigned to either an experimental group that used Grammarly or a control group that received traditional writing instruction. The study collected quantitative and qualitative data, including pre-and post-test assessments of writing skills and surveys and interviews exploring participants' perceptions of Grammarly. Quantitative data analysis showed a significant improvement in the experimental group's writing skills regarding grammatical accuracy, vocabulary use, and overall writing quality. The effect size was also calculated to determine the magnitude of the difference between the two groups. Qualitative data analysis revealed that participants positively perceived Grammarly, including its user-friendliness and ability to provide personalized feedback. The findings suggest that Grammarly effectively teaches English language writing skills and can supplement traditional writing instruction. The study provides insights into the benefits and limitations of Grammarly and its potential impact on English language learners' writing skills. This research contributes to the ongoing discussion on integrating technology in language learning and provides implications for language instructors and developers of writing applications.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44950,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"3L-Language Linguistics Literature-The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"3L-Language Linguistics Literature-The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.30870/jels.v8i2.19294\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"3L-Language Linguistics Literature-The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30870/jels.v8i2.19294","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究探讨了Grammarly应用程序在英语写作技巧教学中的有效性。采用混合方法收集来自100名不同背景和熟练程度的英语学习者的数据。参与者被随机分配到使用语法的实验组和接受传统写作指导的对照组。该研究收集了定量和定性数据,包括测试前和测试后对写作技能的评估,以及调查和访谈,探讨参与者对语法的看法。定量数据分析显示,实验组在语法准确性、词汇使用和整体写作质量方面的写作技能有了显著提高。还计算了效应量,以确定两组之间差异的大小。定性数据分析显示,参与者对Grammarly的评价是积极的,包括其用户友好性和提供个性化反馈的能力。研究结果表明,Grammarly有效地教授英语写作技巧,可以补充传统的写作教学。这项研究揭示了Grammarly的好处和局限性,以及它对英语学习者写作技能的潜在影响。这项研究有助于对语言学习中整合技术的持续讨论,并为语言教师和编写应用程序的开发人员提供启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Enhancing English Language Writing Skills: An Evaluation of the Efficacy of Grammarly Application
This study investigated the effectiveness of using the Grammarly application in teaching English language writing skills. A mixed-methods approach was utilised to collect data from 100 English language learners with diverse backgrounds and levels of proficiency. Participants were randomly assigned to either an experimental group that used Grammarly or a control group that received traditional writing instruction. The study collected quantitative and qualitative data, including pre-and post-test assessments of writing skills and surveys and interviews exploring participants' perceptions of Grammarly. Quantitative data analysis showed a significant improvement in the experimental group's writing skills regarding grammatical accuracy, vocabulary use, and overall writing quality. The effect size was also calculated to determine the magnitude of the difference between the two groups. Qualitative data analysis revealed that participants positively perceived Grammarly, including its user-friendliness and ability to provide personalized feedback. The findings suggest that Grammarly effectively teaches English language writing skills and can supplement traditional writing instruction. The study provides insights into the benefits and limitations of Grammarly and its potential impact on English language learners' writing skills. This research contributes to the ongoing discussion on integrating technology in language learning and provides implications for language instructors and developers of writing applications.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
28.60%
发文量
52
审稿时长
25 weeks
期刊介绍: The editorial board welcomes submissions that provide insights into key issues dealing with the English Language in a region that hosts multicultural/lingual communities and contexts. Our policy is to enable the advancement of knowledge dealing with English Language studies in these communities and contexts by providing a publication avenue for new and insightful multidisciplinary work in the region. The ultimate objective of the journal is to create critical awareness of Southeast Asian concerns with all areas of English language Studies. Submissions that draw parallels between regional and global concerns of English Language Studies are also welome. 3L publishes issues in March, June, September and December. Please visit the website to have a better idea of the kinds of articles published and the submission guidelines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信