两个雕塑,一个大师?两件与“瓜利诺圣凯瑟琳大师”相关的罕见彩色雕塑的技术研究,意大利,14世纪

IF 0.7 4区 社会学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Diana de Bellaigue, Jessica Chloros, Lore Troalen, Laura Hendriks, Justine Lenglet, Jérôme Castel, Xavier Dectot, Negar Haghipour
{"title":"两个雕塑,一个大师?两件与“瓜利诺圣凯瑟琳大师”相关的罕见彩色雕塑的技术研究,意大利,14世纪","authors":"Diana de Bellaigue, Jessica Chloros, Lore Troalen, Laura Hendriks, Justine Lenglet, Jérôme Castel, Xavier Dectot, Negar Haghipour","doi":"10.1080/01971360.2023.2219935","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Between the 1960s and 1990s art historian Giovanni Previtali identified a group of polychrome wood trecento sculptures from the Umbrian-Abruzzo region of Italy as the work of one hand. He named his artist the Maestro della Santa Caterina Gualino after one of the pieces considered to epitomize the style he had identified. Previtali's attribution has since been universally accepted in art historical publications and catalogs. This study tests this assertion through scientific analysis of two of the sculptures named in the group. A team from National Museums Scotland, Edinburgh and the Isabella Stewart Gardner Museum, Boston compared a statue of the Madonna and Child (Edinburgh) and Saint Agnes (Boston) using a variety of analytical tools. Cross-references were made to three other sculptures in the group to which access was gained. The results of this analysis highlight the challenges of testing stylistic associations in the laboratory. Despite taking a scientific approach to data collection and collation there is still much scope for subjectivity in interpretation. Rather than providing a conclusion, our work has opened the door wider still for multiple interpretations, illustrating the limitations of analysis in supporting definitive statements about the authorship of Medieval polychrome sculpture.","PeriodicalId":17165,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Institute for Conservation","volume":"14 6‐7","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Two Sculptures, One Master? A Technical Study of Two Rare Examples of Polychrome Sculptures Associated with “the Master of Saint Catherine of Gualino”, Italy, Fourteenth Century\",\"authors\":\"Diana de Bellaigue, Jessica Chloros, Lore Troalen, Laura Hendriks, Justine Lenglet, Jérôme Castel, Xavier Dectot, Negar Haghipour\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/01971360.2023.2219935\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Between the 1960s and 1990s art historian Giovanni Previtali identified a group of polychrome wood trecento sculptures from the Umbrian-Abruzzo region of Italy as the work of one hand. He named his artist the Maestro della Santa Caterina Gualino after one of the pieces considered to epitomize the style he had identified. Previtali's attribution has since been universally accepted in art historical publications and catalogs. This study tests this assertion through scientific analysis of two of the sculptures named in the group. A team from National Museums Scotland, Edinburgh and the Isabella Stewart Gardner Museum, Boston compared a statue of the Madonna and Child (Edinburgh) and Saint Agnes (Boston) using a variety of analytical tools. Cross-references were made to three other sculptures in the group to which access was gained. The results of this analysis highlight the challenges of testing stylistic associations in the laboratory. Despite taking a scientific approach to data collection and collation there is still much scope for subjectivity in interpretation. Rather than providing a conclusion, our work has opened the door wider still for multiple interpretations, illustrating the limitations of analysis in supporting definitive statements about the authorship of Medieval polychrome sculpture.\",\"PeriodicalId\":17165,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American Institute for Conservation\",\"volume\":\"14 6‐7\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American Institute for Conservation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/01971360.2023.2219935\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Institute for Conservation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01971360.2023.2219935","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在20世纪60年代到90年代之间,艺术史学家Giovanni Previtali在意大利翁布里安-阿布鲁佐地区发现了一组彩色木雕,它们是单手创作的。他将他的艺术家命名为大师德拉圣卡特琳娜瓜利诺,因为他认为其中一件作品是他所确定的风格的缩影。此后,普雷塔利的署名在艺术史出版物和目录中被普遍接受。本研究通过对组中提到的两个雕塑的科学分析来验证这一断言。来自苏格兰爱丁堡国家博物馆和波士顿伊莎贝拉·斯图尔特·加德纳博物馆的一个团队使用各种分析工具比较了圣母与圣婴(爱丁堡)和圣艾格尼丝(波士顿)的雕像。与该组中获得访问权限的其他三个雕塑进行了交叉参考。这一分析的结果突出了在实验室中测试风格关联的挑战。尽管采取了科学的方法来收集和整理数据,但在解释方面仍有很大的主观性。我们的工作不是提供一个结论,而是为多种解释打开了更大的大门,说明了分析在支持关于中世纪彩绘雕塑作者的明确声明方面的局限性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Two Sculptures, One Master? A Technical Study of Two Rare Examples of Polychrome Sculptures Associated with “the Master of Saint Catherine of Gualino”, Italy, Fourteenth Century
Between the 1960s and 1990s art historian Giovanni Previtali identified a group of polychrome wood trecento sculptures from the Umbrian-Abruzzo region of Italy as the work of one hand. He named his artist the Maestro della Santa Caterina Gualino after one of the pieces considered to epitomize the style he had identified. Previtali's attribution has since been universally accepted in art historical publications and catalogs. This study tests this assertion through scientific analysis of two of the sculptures named in the group. A team from National Museums Scotland, Edinburgh and the Isabella Stewart Gardner Museum, Boston compared a statue of the Madonna and Child (Edinburgh) and Saint Agnes (Boston) using a variety of analytical tools. Cross-references were made to three other sculptures in the group to which access was gained. The results of this analysis highlight the challenges of testing stylistic associations in the laboratory. Despite taking a scientific approach to data collection and collation there is still much scope for subjectivity in interpretation. Rather than providing a conclusion, our work has opened the door wider still for multiple interpretations, illustrating the limitations of analysis in supporting definitive statements about the authorship of Medieval polychrome sculpture.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
期刊介绍: The American Institute for Conservation is the largest conservation membership organization in the United States, and counts among its more than 3000 members the majority of professional conservators, conservation educators and conservation scientists worldwide. The Journal of the American Institute for Conservation (JAIC, or the Journal) is the primary vehicle for the publication of peer-reviewed technical studies, research papers, treatment case studies and ethics and standards discussions relating to the broad field of conservation and preservation of historic and cultural works. Subscribers to the JAIC include AIC members, both individuals and institutions, as well as major libraries and universities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信