大容量妇科手术中心的机器人手术趋势和效率

IF 0.3 Q4 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Alexandra Snyder, Yael Baumfeld, S. Abbas Shobeiri
{"title":"大容量妇科手术中心的机器人手术趋势和效率","authors":"Alexandra Snyder, Yael Baumfeld, S. Abbas Shobeiri","doi":"10.1089/gyn.2023.0020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: This study evaluated trends and efficiency of robotic surgeons per surgical volume, procedure type, and subspecialty. As robotic surgery is more popular in gynecologic subspecialties, studies comparing surgical volume suggest that robotic gynecologic surgery is advantageous when performed by high-volume surgeons and used for complex surgeries. Materials and Methods: During 2017–2021, evaluations were made of 3914 robotic gynecologic surgery cases performed at the Inova Fairfax Women's Hospital, Fairfax, VA, USA. All patients having robotic gynecologic surgery during the study were included. Surgeons were divided into high-, medium-, and low-volume groups. Statistical analysis evaluated changes in procedure types, surgeon subspecialties, operating times, and surgeon volumes. Results: Over the 5 years, there was a significant increase in adnexal surgery, surgery for pelvic organ prolapse, and myomectomy. High-volume surgeons performed more-complex surgeries overall. Operating room (OR) and surgery times were significantly lower for high-volume surgeons than for other groups. Conclusions: There was an increased variety of procedure types performed on the Da Vinci® robot over the 5 years. The data showed that high-volume surgeons had shorter OR and surgery times while performing more-complicated surgeries. This supports that high-volume gynecologic surgeons perform robotic cases more efficiently. With the increased interest in robotic surgery among surgeons and patients, an ongoing analysis of robotic surgery trends is essential to optimize availability, usage, and outcomes of these surgeries. (J GYNECOL SURG 20XX:000)","PeriodicalId":44791,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGIC SURGERY","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Robotic Surgery Trends and Efficiency in a High-Volume Gynecologic Surgery Center\",\"authors\":\"Alexandra Snyder, Yael Baumfeld, S. Abbas Shobeiri\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/gyn.2023.0020\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: This study evaluated trends and efficiency of robotic surgeons per surgical volume, procedure type, and subspecialty. As robotic surgery is more popular in gynecologic subspecialties, studies comparing surgical volume suggest that robotic gynecologic surgery is advantageous when performed by high-volume surgeons and used for complex surgeries. Materials and Methods: During 2017–2021, evaluations were made of 3914 robotic gynecologic surgery cases performed at the Inova Fairfax Women's Hospital, Fairfax, VA, USA. All patients having robotic gynecologic surgery during the study were included. Surgeons were divided into high-, medium-, and low-volume groups. Statistical analysis evaluated changes in procedure types, surgeon subspecialties, operating times, and surgeon volumes. Results: Over the 5 years, there was a significant increase in adnexal surgery, surgery for pelvic organ prolapse, and myomectomy. High-volume surgeons performed more-complex surgeries overall. Operating room (OR) and surgery times were significantly lower for high-volume surgeons than for other groups. Conclusions: There was an increased variety of procedure types performed on the Da Vinci® robot over the 5 years. The data showed that high-volume surgeons had shorter OR and surgery times while performing more-complicated surgeries. This supports that high-volume gynecologic surgeons perform robotic cases more efficiently. With the increased interest in robotic surgery among surgeons and patients, an ongoing analysis of robotic surgery trends is essential to optimize availability, usage, and outcomes of these surgeries. (J GYNECOL SURG 20XX:000)\",\"PeriodicalId\":44791,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGIC SURGERY\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGIC SURGERY\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/gyn.2023.0020\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGIC SURGERY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/gyn.2023.0020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究评估机器人外科医生在手术量、手术类型和亚专科方面的发展趋势和效率。由于机器人手术在妇科亚专科更受欢迎,比较手术量的研究表明,机器人妇科手术在由大手术量的外科医生进行和用于复杂手术时是有利的。材料与方法:2017-2021年,对美国弗吉尼亚州费尔法克斯Inova Fairfax妇女医院进行的3914例机器人妇科手术进行评估。所有在研究期间接受机器人妇科手术的患者都被纳入研究范围。外科医生被分为高、中、低容积组。统计分析评估了手术类型、外科医生亚专科、手术时间和外科医生数量的变化。结果:5年来,附件手术、盆腔器官脱垂手术和子宫肌瘤切除术的数量显著增加。总体而言,大容量外科医生进行的手术更为复杂。手术量大的外科医生的手术室(OR)和手术时间明显低于其他组。结论:在过去的5年中,在达芬奇®机器人上进行的手术类型有所增加。数据显示,在进行更复杂的手术时,大容量外科医生的手术时间和手术时间更短。这支持大容量妇科外科医生更有效地执行机器人病例。随着外科医生和患者对机器人手术的兴趣日益增加,对机器人手术趋势的持续分析对于优化这些手术的可用性、使用和结果至关重要。(j妇科外科200xx:000)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Robotic Surgery Trends and Efficiency in a High-Volume Gynecologic Surgery Center
Objective: This study evaluated trends and efficiency of robotic surgeons per surgical volume, procedure type, and subspecialty. As robotic surgery is more popular in gynecologic subspecialties, studies comparing surgical volume suggest that robotic gynecologic surgery is advantageous when performed by high-volume surgeons and used for complex surgeries. Materials and Methods: During 2017–2021, evaluations were made of 3914 robotic gynecologic surgery cases performed at the Inova Fairfax Women's Hospital, Fairfax, VA, USA. All patients having robotic gynecologic surgery during the study were included. Surgeons were divided into high-, medium-, and low-volume groups. Statistical analysis evaluated changes in procedure types, surgeon subspecialties, operating times, and surgeon volumes. Results: Over the 5 years, there was a significant increase in adnexal surgery, surgery for pelvic organ prolapse, and myomectomy. High-volume surgeons performed more-complex surgeries overall. Operating room (OR) and surgery times were significantly lower for high-volume surgeons than for other groups. Conclusions: There was an increased variety of procedure types performed on the Da Vinci® robot over the 5 years. The data showed that high-volume surgeons had shorter OR and surgery times while performing more-complicated surgeries. This supports that high-volume gynecologic surgeons perform robotic cases more efficiently. With the increased interest in robotic surgery among surgeons and patients, an ongoing analysis of robotic surgery trends is essential to optimize availability, usage, and outcomes of these surgeries. (J GYNECOL SURG 20XX:000)
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGIC SURGERY
JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGIC SURGERY OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
33.30%
发文量
69
期刊介绍: The central forum for clinical articles dealing with all aspects of operative and office gynecology, including colposcopy, hysteroscopy, laparoscopy, laser surgery, conventional surgery, female urology, microsurgery, in vitro fertilization, and infectious diseases. The Official Journal of the Gynecologic Surgery Society, the International Society for Gynecologic Endoscopy, and the British Society for Cervical Pathology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信