{"title":"《罗马宣言》、《罗马法》与古代法医学:以威尼斯为例","authors":"Nephele Papakonstantinou","doi":"10.7358/rdr-2023-papa","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This paper discusses the Roman legal treatment of poisoning, grounded on the lex Cornelia de sicariis et veneficis (81 BCE), through the lens of school forensic declamations (controversiae). Sections 1-4 set the context and address key methodological issues. Section 5, the core of the research, examines Pseudo-Quintilian’s Declamatio minor 350 Aqua frigida privigno data (Cold water given to stepson) – a fictitious legal case concerning a suspicious death caused by drinking cold water. It is argued that the medico-legal assumptions underlying this distinctly unique case are likely to have brought new content to the legal conceptualisation of the reckless administration of venena, and hence, to the juristic interpretation of the degree of criminal intent required in similar cases of suspected homicide. The overall objective is to provide new insights of multidisciplinary relevance into the intersections of Roman Imperial forensic rhetoric, Roman law, and Graeco-Roman medicine, by looking closer at the method of argument through which trials involving a charge of poisoning may have been conducted in actual court practice.","PeriodicalId":81592,"journal":{"name":"Ivra; rivista internazionale di diritto romano e antico","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Roman Declamation, Roman Law, and Ancient Legal Medicine: the Case of veneficium\",\"authors\":\"Nephele Papakonstantinou\",\"doi\":\"10.7358/rdr-2023-papa\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract This paper discusses the Roman legal treatment of poisoning, grounded on the lex Cornelia de sicariis et veneficis (81 BCE), through the lens of school forensic declamations (controversiae). Sections 1-4 set the context and address key methodological issues. Section 5, the core of the research, examines Pseudo-Quintilian’s Declamatio minor 350 Aqua frigida privigno data (Cold water given to stepson) – a fictitious legal case concerning a suspicious death caused by drinking cold water. It is argued that the medico-legal assumptions underlying this distinctly unique case are likely to have brought new content to the legal conceptualisation of the reckless administration of venena, and hence, to the juristic interpretation of the degree of criminal intent required in similar cases of suspected homicide. The overall objective is to provide new insights of multidisciplinary relevance into the intersections of Roman Imperial forensic rhetoric, Roman law, and Graeco-Roman medicine, by looking closer at the method of argument through which trials involving a charge of poisoning may have been conducted in actual court practice.\",\"PeriodicalId\":81592,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ivra; rivista internazionale di diritto romano e antico\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ivra; rivista internazionale di diritto romano e antico\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7358/rdr-2023-papa\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ivra; rivista internazionale di diritto romano e antico","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7358/rdr-2023-papa","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
摘要本文以《罗马中毒法》(lex Cornelia de sicariis et veneficis,公元前81年)为基础,通过学校法医声明(有争议的)的视角,探讨了罗马对中毒的法律处理。第1-4节设置了上下文并解决了关键的方法问题。第5节是研究的核心,审查伪昆提利安的《未成年人宣言》350 Aqua frigida privigno data(给继子冷水),这是一个虚构的法律案件,涉及因饮用冷水而导致的可疑死亡。有人认为,这一明显独特的案件所依据的医学法律假设,很可能为肆无忌惮地使用尸体的法律概念带来了新的内容,从而也为类似的涉嫌杀人案件所需的犯罪意图程度的法律解释带来了新的内容。总体目标是通过更仔细地研究涉及中毒指控的审判可能在实际法庭实践中进行的论证方法,为罗马帝国法医修辞、罗马法和希腊罗马医学的交叉点提供多学科相关性的新见解。
Roman Declamation, Roman Law, and Ancient Legal Medicine: the Case of veneficium
Abstract This paper discusses the Roman legal treatment of poisoning, grounded on the lex Cornelia de sicariis et veneficis (81 BCE), through the lens of school forensic declamations (controversiae). Sections 1-4 set the context and address key methodological issues. Section 5, the core of the research, examines Pseudo-Quintilian’s Declamatio minor 350 Aqua frigida privigno data (Cold water given to stepson) – a fictitious legal case concerning a suspicious death caused by drinking cold water. It is argued that the medico-legal assumptions underlying this distinctly unique case are likely to have brought new content to the legal conceptualisation of the reckless administration of venena, and hence, to the juristic interpretation of the degree of criminal intent required in similar cases of suspected homicide. The overall objective is to provide new insights of multidisciplinary relevance into the intersections of Roman Imperial forensic rhetoric, Roman law, and Graeco-Roman medicine, by looking closer at the method of argument through which trials involving a charge of poisoning may have been conducted in actual court practice.