Augusto L. Henriques, Daniel D. D. Carmo, Tiago K. Krolow, Rafael de Fraga
{"title":"利用高度多样化的马蝇(双翅目:虻科)对亚马逊地区进行生物地理区划:来自三十年数据的见解","authors":"Augusto L. Henriques, Daniel D. D. Carmo, Tiago K. Krolow, Rafael de Fraga","doi":"10.1080/01650521.2023.2254505","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTDelimiting biogeographic regions based on occurrence data is an interesting approach to investigating processes behind biodiversity distribution patterns. Comparing spatial scales and identifying predictor variables of biogeographic regions have wide application for biodiversity conservation. In this study we used a comprehensive database containing more than thirty years of horse fly records to estimate species richness, endemism, and species composition, and regionalize the Amazon biogeographically. We compared five spatial scales defined by grid size (1–5º), and test five hypotheses (elevation, climate, vegetation cover, and two regionalizations from the literature) to identify predictors of the biogeographic regions. Endemism, species richness and composition were predicted by different sets of predictor variables, although the models were highly dependent on spatial scale. We identified three well-defined biogeographic regions, which have been formed by a combination of geographic distance, climate and historical factors converging with some theories proposed for mammals. Our models indicated dispersal as a key factor for regionalization, as it can be constrained by a combination of climate and historical processes changing habitats over time, although this finding was highly dependent on spatial scale. We showed that horse flies are interesting models for biogeography although they have been historically neglected.KEYWORDS: EndemismNeotropicsspatial scalespecies compositiontabanid AcknowledgmentsWe thank all the curators of the entomological collections visited, the Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia for the logistical support in the expeditions, and Professor Francisco Xavier (Chico) for technical support.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Supplementary materialSupplemental data for this article can be accessed online at https://doi.org/10.1080/01650521.2023.2254505Additional informationFundingALH thanks the Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq) for financial support (Programa Ciências Sem Fronteiras, grant number [246878/2012-6]), ‘Ação transversal: Redes Regionais de Pesquisas em Biodiversidade e Tecnologia’, grant number 79/2013 grant number [407627/2013-8], project ‘Biodiversidade de Insetos na Amazônia-Rede BIA’ and Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Amazonas, Edital Universal grant number [0002/2018], Project ‘Tabanidae da Amazônia: Taxonomia e Diversidade’. TKK and DDDC thanks to the Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq) for the scholarship granted (grant numbers [310214/2021-1] and [151354/2022-7], respectively).","PeriodicalId":49465,"journal":{"name":"Studies on Neotropical Fauna and Environment","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Biogeographic regionalization of the Amazon using highly diverse horse flies (Diptera: Tabanidae): insights from three decades of data\",\"authors\":\"Augusto L. Henriques, Daniel D. D. Carmo, Tiago K. Krolow, Rafael de Fraga\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/01650521.2023.2254505\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACTDelimiting biogeographic regions based on occurrence data is an interesting approach to investigating processes behind biodiversity distribution patterns. Comparing spatial scales and identifying predictor variables of biogeographic regions have wide application for biodiversity conservation. In this study we used a comprehensive database containing more than thirty years of horse fly records to estimate species richness, endemism, and species composition, and regionalize the Amazon biogeographically. We compared five spatial scales defined by grid size (1–5º), and test five hypotheses (elevation, climate, vegetation cover, and two regionalizations from the literature) to identify predictors of the biogeographic regions. Endemism, species richness and composition were predicted by different sets of predictor variables, although the models were highly dependent on spatial scale. We identified three well-defined biogeographic regions, which have been formed by a combination of geographic distance, climate and historical factors converging with some theories proposed for mammals. Our models indicated dispersal as a key factor for regionalization, as it can be constrained by a combination of climate and historical processes changing habitats over time, although this finding was highly dependent on spatial scale. We showed that horse flies are interesting models for biogeography although they have been historically neglected.KEYWORDS: EndemismNeotropicsspatial scalespecies compositiontabanid AcknowledgmentsWe thank all the curators of the entomological collections visited, the Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia for the logistical support in the expeditions, and Professor Francisco Xavier (Chico) for technical support.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Supplementary materialSupplemental data for this article can be accessed online at https://doi.org/10.1080/01650521.2023.2254505Additional informationFundingALH thanks the Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq) for financial support (Programa Ciências Sem Fronteiras, grant number [246878/2012-6]), ‘Ação transversal: Redes Regionais de Pesquisas em Biodiversidade e Tecnologia’, grant number 79/2013 grant number [407627/2013-8], project ‘Biodiversidade de Insetos na Amazônia-Rede BIA’ and Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Amazonas, Edital Universal grant number [0002/2018], Project ‘Tabanidae da Amazônia: Taxonomia e Diversidade’. TKK and DDDC thanks to the Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq) for the scholarship granted (grant numbers [310214/2021-1] and [151354/2022-7], respectively).\",\"PeriodicalId\":49465,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Studies on Neotropical Fauna and Environment\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Studies on Neotropical Fauna and Environment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/01650521.2023.2254505\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ZOOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies on Neotropical Fauna and Environment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01650521.2023.2254505","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ZOOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
摘要基于发生数据划分生物地理区域是研究生物多样性分布模式背后的过程的一种有趣的方法。生物地理区域的空间尺度比较和预测变量识别在生物多样性保护中具有广泛的应用价值。在这项研究中,我们使用了一个包含超过30年马蝇记录的综合数据库来估计物种丰富度、特有性和物种组成,并对亚马逊地区进行了生物地理区划。我们比较了由网格大小(1-5º)定义的5个空间尺度,并检验了5个假设(海拔、气候、植被覆盖和文献中的两种区划),以确定生物地理区域的预测因子。虽然模型高度依赖于空间尺度,但可以用不同的预测变量集来预测物种的地方性、丰富度和组成。我们确定了三个明确的生物地理区域,它们是由地理距离、气候和历史因素共同作用形成的,并与一些关于哺乳动物的理论相结合。我们的模型表明,尽管这一发现高度依赖于空间尺度,但分散是区域化的关键因素,因为它可能受到气候和历史过程随时间变化的限制。我们发现马蝇是生物地理学的有趣模型,尽管它们在历史上一直被忽视。关键词:EndemismNeotropicsspatial scalespecies compositiontabanid AcknowledgmentsWe感谢所有昆虫的集合的策展人,西班牙de尽管亚马逊探险的后勤支持,和旧金山泽维尔教授(Chico)技术支持。披露声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。补充材料本文的补充数据可在线访问https://doi.org/10.1080/01650521.2023.2254505Additional informationFundingALH感谢Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)的财政支持(Programa Ciências Sem Fronteiras,拨款号[246878/2012-6]),' aapart o transversal:“区域生物多样性研究与技术研究”,资助号79/2013,资助号[407627/2013-8],“生物多样性研究与技术研究”项目,“巴西生物多样性研究与技术研究”项目,“巴西亚马逊州生物多样性研究与技术研究基金”项目,“巴西Tabanidae数据Amazônia:生物多样性分类研究”项目,数字通用资助号[0002/2018]。TKK和DDDC感谢Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)授予的奖学金(资助号分别为[310214/2021-1]和[151354/2022-7])。
Biogeographic regionalization of the Amazon using highly diverse horse flies (Diptera: Tabanidae): insights from three decades of data
ABSTRACTDelimiting biogeographic regions based on occurrence data is an interesting approach to investigating processes behind biodiversity distribution patterns. Comparing spatial scales and identifying predictor variables of biogeographic regions have wide application for biodiversity conservation. In this study we used a comprehensive database containing more than thirty years of horse fly records to estimate species richness, endemism, and species composition, and regionalize the Amazon biogeographically. We compared five spatial scales defined by grid size (1–5º), and test five hypotheses (elevation, climate, vegetation cover, and two regionalizations from the literature) to identify predictors of the biogeographic regions. Endemism, species richness and composition were predicted by different sets of predictor variables, although the models were highly dependent on spatial scale. We identified three well-defined biogeographic regions, which have been formed by a combination of geographic distance, climate and historical factors converging with some theories proposed for mammals. Our models indicated dispersal as a key factor for regionalization, as it can be constrained by a combination of climate and historical processes changing habitats over time, although this finding was highly dependent on spatial scale. We showed that horse flies are interesting models for biogeography although they have been historically neglected.KEYWORDS: EndemismNeotropicsspatial scalespecies compositiontabanid AcknowledgmentsWe thank all the curators of the entomological collections visited, the Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia for the logistical support in the expeditions, and Professor Francisco Xavier (Chico) for technical support.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Supplementary materialSupplemental data for this article can be accessed online at https://doi.org/10.1080/01650521.2023.2254505Additional informationFundingALH thanks the Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq) for financial support (Programa Ciências Sem Fronteiras, grant number [246878/2012-6]), ‘Ação transversal: Redes Regionais de Pesquisas em Biodiversidade e Tecnologia’, grant number 79/2013 grant number [407627/2013-8], project ‘Biodiversidade de Insetos na Amazônia-Rede BIA’ and Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Amazonas, Edital Universal grant number [0002/2018], Project ‘Tabanidae da Amazônia: Taxonomia e Diversidade’. TKK and DDDC thanks to the Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq) for the scholarship granted (grant numbers [310214/2021-1] and [151354/2022-7], respectively).
期刊介绍:
There is still a far from complete understanding of the complex ecosystems in the Neotropics, although they have been studied since the first expeditions of the old world naturalists Marcgrave, Humboldt, Spix, Darwin, Bates and Müller. The aims and scope of the Journal are, besides taxonomic and zoogeographic surveys, analyses of animal communities and their relationship with biotic and abiotic environmental conditions. This includes the fauna of both terrestrial and fresh water ecosystems in the Neotropics. Contributions that represent original research and mini-reviews are welcome.
Manuscripts presenting just checklists and new geographic records are not considered for publication.
If manuscripts do not meet the requirements of the journal, the editors reserve the right to reject manuscripts on submission or to ask for revisions prior to formal peer review.