极权主义与个人主义揭秘:霍布斯与奥威尔

Ufuk ÖZEN BAYKENT
{"title":"极权主义与个人主义揭秘:霍布斯与奥威尔","authors":"Ufuk ÖZEN BAYKENT","doi":"10.20981/kaygi.1348193","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"George Orwell’s Nineteen Eighty-Four holds significant importance today partly because it remains relevant to contemporary society and partly because it warns the societies against totalitarianism. On the other hand, Thomas Hobbes holds a contrary view in terms of the political system he defends, a view shaped by the circumstances his country was in. The present study aims to examine the portrayal of totalitarianism in Orwell’s dystopian masterpiece, Nineteen Eighty-Four and to explore what Hobbes contrarily argues about the necessity of a powerful authority in the establishment and continuity of a harmonious society. The writings by Orwell and Hobbes, the implications the novel carries for fundamental questions about personal freedom, autonomy, and the stifling of individuality will be analyzed by addressing to the concept of totalitarianism that is related to the arguments proposed by Thomas Hobbes in Leviathan. A philosophical consideration of the novel and comparison of how Orwell and Hobbes reacted the idea of totalitarianism in two different ways in their own contexts will encourage us to examine our own political systems, media, and societal norms today.","PeriodicalId":474520,"journal":{"name":"Kaygı. Bursa Uludağ Üniversitesi fen-edebiyat fakültesi felsefe dergisi","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Totalitarianism and Individualism Unveiled: Hobbes and Orwell\",\"authors\":\"Ufuk ÖZEN BAYKENT\",\"doi\":\"10.20981/kaygi.1348193\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"George Orwell’s Nineteen Eighty-Four holds significant importance today partly because it remains relevant to contemporary society and partly because it warns the societies against totalitarianism. On the other hand, Thomas Hobbes holds a contrary view in terms of the political system he defends, a view shaped by the circumstances his country was in. The present study aims to examine the portrayal of totalitarianism in Orwell’s dystopian masterpiece, Nineteen Eighty-Four and to explore what Hobbes contrarily argues about the necessity of a powerful authority in the establishment and continuity of a harmonious society. The writings by Orwell and Hobbes, the implications the novel carries for fundamental questions about personal freedom, autonomy, and the stifling of individuality will be analyzed by addressing to the concept of totalitarianism that is related to the arguments proposed by Thomas Hobbes in Leviathan. A philosophical consideration of the novel and comparison of how Orwell and Hobbes reacted the idea of totalitarianism in two different ways in their own contexts will encourage us to examine our own political systems, media, and societal norms today.\",\"PeriodicalId\":474520,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Kaygı. Bursa Uludağ Üniversitesi fen-edebiyat fakültesi felsefe dergisi\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Kaygı. Bursa Uludağ Üniversitesi fen-edebiyat fakültesi felsefe dergisi\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.20981/kaygi.1348193\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kaygı. Bursa Uludağ Üniversitesi fen-edebiyat fakültesi felsefe dergisi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20981/kaygi.1348193","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

乔治·奥威尔的《一九八四》在今天仍然具有重要意义,部分原因是它仍然与当代社会有关,部分原因是它警告社会反对极权主义。另一方面,托马斯·霍布斯对他所捍卫的政治制度持相反的观点,这种观点是由他的国家所处的环境所形成的。本研究旨在考察奥威尔的反乌托邦杰作《一九八四》中对极权主义的描绘,并探讨霍布斯关于在和谐社会的建立和延续中强大权威的必要性的相反观点。奥威尔和霍布斯的作品,这部小说对个人自由,自主,个性压抑等基本问题的暗示,将通过对极权主义概念的分析,这与托马斯·霍布斯在《利维坦》中提出的论点有关。对这部小说进行哲学思考,并比较奥威尔和霍布斯在各自的背景下以两种不同的方式对极权主义思想的反应,将鼓励我们审视我们自己今天的政治制度、媒体和社会规范。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Totalitarianism and Individualism Unveiled: Hobbes and Orwell
George Orwell’s Nineteen Eighty-Four holds significant importance today partly because it remains relevant to contemporary society and partly because it warns the societies against totalitarianism. On the other hand, Thomas Hobbes holds a contrary view in terms of the political system he defends, a view shaped by the circumstances his country was in. The present study aims to examine the portrayal of totalitarianism in Orwell’s dystopian masterpiece, Nineteen Eighty-Four and to explore what Hobbes contrarily argues about the necessity of a powerful authority in the establishment and continuity of a harmonious society. The writings by Orwell and Hobbes, the implications the novel carries for fundamental questions about personal freedom, autonomy, and the stifling of individuality will be analyzed by addressing to the concept of totalitarianism that is related to the arguments proposed by Thomas Hobbes in Leviathan. A philosophical consideration of the novel and comparison of how Orwell and Hobbes reacted the idea of totalitarianism in two different ways in their own contexts will encourage us to examine our own political systems, media, and societal norms today.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信