视频指导胸外按压提高院外心脏骤停患者存活率

Annabelle Shen, Alexander Shen
{"title":"视频指导胸外按压提高院外心脏骤停患者存活率","authors":"Annabelle Shen, Alexander Shen","doi":"10.33696/cardiology.4.042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Cardiovascular disease has been the leading cause of mortality worldwide for the past century, but advancements in health intervention have led to a decline of over 20%. However, the Out of Hospital Cardiac Arrest (OHCA) mortality rate remains unacceptably high, exceeding 90% over the past few decades. The primary reasons are the lack of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) knowledge and delayed medical response [1]. In 2018, the American Heart Association (AHA) introduced audio-directed CPR by 911 operators. However, the effectiveness of this approach in guiding laypeople to perform CPR is far from optimal [2]. Methods: Laypeople were randomly divided into audio and video groups, with each group receiving instructions through their respective medium on how to perform CPR on manikins. Simulated OHCA scenarios were created, involving on-site testing with subjects having no prior CPR experience, and a remote call site providing CPR instructions either through audio or video. Both on-site and online activities were recorded and analyzed. The accuracy of hand positions, the time of CPR initiation, the speed and effectiveness (depth) of chest compressions were tracked and compared between the audio and video guided groups based on AHA requirements. Results: Across 61 trials, CPR initiation occurred in 22 ± 11 seconds in the audio group and 22 ± 6 seconds in the video group. Hand location accuracy was 77% in audio participants and 97% in video participants (p<0.05). The average speed of CPR was 0.55 ± 0.23 seconds with audio guidance and 0.45 ± 0.27 seconds with video guidance. The effectiveness of compressions was 33% ± 39% in the audio group and significantly improved to 79% ± 26% in the video group (p<0.0001). Conclusion: The implementation of a new video-guided CPR system can significantly enhance CPR effectiveness when compared to the audio-assisted approach.","PeriodicalId":15510,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Cardiology","volume":"54 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Improve Survival of Out of Hospital Cardiac Arrest with Video-directed Chest Compressions\",\"authors\":\"Annabelle Shen, Alexander Shen\",\"doi\":\"10.33696/cardiology.4.042\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Cardiovascular disease has been the leading cause of mortality worldwide for the past century, but advancements in health intervention have led to a decline of over 20%. However, the Out of Hospital Cardiac Arrest (OHCA) mortality rate remains unacceptably high, exceeding 90% over the past few decades. The primary reasons are the lack of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) knowledge and delayed medical response [1]. In 2018, the American Heart Association (AHA) introduced audio-directed CPR by 911 operators. However, the effectiveness of this approach in guiding laypeople to perform CPR is far from optimal [2]. Methods: Laypeople were randomly divided into audio and video groups, with each group receiving instructions through their respective medium on how to perform CPR on manikins. Simulated OHCA scenarios were created, involving on-site testing with subjects having no prior CPR experience, and a remote call site providing CPR instructions either through audio or video. Both on-site and online activities were recorded and analyzed. The accuracy of hand positions, the time of CPR initiation, the speed and effectiveness (depth) of chest compressions were tracked and compared between the audio and video guided groups based on AHA requirements. Results: Across 61 trials, CPR initiation occurred in 22 ± 11 seconds in the audio group and 22 ± 6 seconds in the video group. Hand location accuracy was 77% in audio participants and 97% in video participants (p<0.05). The average speed of CPR was 0.55 ± 0.23 seconds with audio guidance and 0.45 ± 0.27 seconds with video guidance. The effectiveness of compressions was 33% ± 39% in the audio group and significantly improved to 79% ± 26% in the video group (p<0.0001). Conclusion: The implementation of a new video-guided CPR system can significantly enhance CPR effectiveness when compared to the audio-assisted approach.\",\"PeriodicalId\":15510,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Cardiology\",\"volume\":\"54 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Cardiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33696/cardiology.4.042\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33696/cardiology.4.042","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在过去的一个世纪里,心血管疾病一直是世界范围内死亡的主要原因,但卫生干预措施的进步使其下降了20%以上。然而,院外心脏骤停(OHCA)的死亡率仍然高得令人无法接受,在过去几十年中超过90%。其主要原因是心肺复苏(CPR)知识的缺乏和医疗反应的滞后[1]。2018年,美国心脏协会(AHA)推出了由911接线员进行的音频指导CPR。然而,这种方法在指导外行人实施心肺复苏术方面的有效性远未达到最佳[2]。方法:外行人随机分为音频组和视频组,每组通过各自的媒介接受人体模型心肺复苏术的指导。模拟OHCA场景,包括现场测试,受试者之前没有心肺复苏经验,远程呼叫站点通过音频或视频提供心肺复苏指导。现场和在线活动都被记录和分析。根据AHA要求,跟踪并比较音频和视频指导组的手位准确性、心肺复苏启动时间、胸外按压速度和效果(深度)。结果:在61项试验中,音频组CPR启动时间为22±11秒,视频组为22±6秒。音频参与者的手定位准确率为77%,视频参与者的手定位准确率为97% (p < 0.05)。语音引导下CPR的平均速度为0.55±0.23秒,视频引导下CPR的平均速度为0.45±0.27秒。音频组的压缩效率为33%±39%,视频组的压缩效率显著提高至79%±26% (p<0.0001)。结论:与音频辅助方法相比,视频引导心肺复苏术系统的实施可显著提高心肺复苏术的效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Improve Survival of Out of Hospital Cardiac Arrest with Video-directed Chest Compressions
Background: Cardiovascular disease has been the leading cause of mortality worldwide for the past century, but advancements in health intervention have led to a decline of over 20%. However, the Out of Hospital Cardiac Arrest (OHCA) mortality rate remains unacceptably high, exceeding 90% over the past few decades. The primary reasons are the lack of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) knowledge and delayed medical response [1]. In 2018, the American Heart Association (AHA) introduced audio-directed CPR by 911 operators. However, the effectiveness of this approach in guiding laypeople to perform CPR is far from optimal [2]. Methods: Laypeople were randomly divided into audio and video groups, with each group receiving instructions through their respective medium on how to perform CPR on manikins. Simulated OHCA scenarios were created, involving on-site testing with subjects having no prior CPR experience, and a remote call site providing CPR instructions either through audio or video. Both on-site and online activities were recorded and analyzed. The accuracy of hand positions, the time of CPR initiation, the speed and effectiveness (depth) of chest compressions were tracked and compared between the audio and video guided groups based on AHA requirements. Results: Across 61 trials, CPR initiation occurred in 22 ± 11 seconds in the audio group and 22 ± 6 seconds in the video group. Hand location accuracy was 77% in audio participants and 97% in video participants (p<0.05). The average speed of CPR was 0.55 ± 0.23 seconds with audio guidance and 0.45 ± 0.27 seconds with video guidance. The effectiveness of compressions was 33% ± 39% in the audio group and significantly improved to 79% ± 26% in the video group (p<0.0001). Conclusion: The implementation of a new video-guided CPR system can significantly enhance CPR effectiveness when compared to the audio-assisted approach.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信