法国雇员专利权的司法和立法途径

IF 0.4 4区 社会学 Q3 LAW
Konstantin Voropaev
{"title":"法国雇员专利权的司法和立法途径","authors":"Konstantin Voropaev","doi":"10.4337/qmjip.2023.03.04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article examines the evolving landscape of employee patent rights in France, focusing on both judicial and legislative approaches. It highlights the challenges posed by intellectual property creation within legal frameworks that lack clear provisions for ownership. The article explores the changing nature of employee patent rights in France through the lens of case law and legislative amendments. It emphasizes the importance of judicial practice in addressing legislative gaps and providing clarity on various aspects of employee patent rights, including ownership, remuneration, formal procedures, and dispute resolution. Drawing comparisons with the German system, the article underscores the role of case law as a critical source of law in shaping the legal framework for employee patent rights. It concludes by highlighting the significance of ensuring inventors’ rights and fair compensation to foster innovation.","PeriodicalId":42155,"journal":{"name":"Queen Mary Journal of Intellectual Property","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Judicial and legislative approaches to employee patent rights in France\",\"authors\":\"Konstantin Voropaev\",\"doi\":\"10.4337/qmjip.2023.03.04\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article examines the evolving landscape of employee patent rights in France, focusing on both judicial and legislative approaches. It highlights the challenges posed by intellectual property creation within legal frameworks that lack clear provisions for ownership. The article explores the changing nature of employee patent rights in France through the lens of case law and legislative amendments. It emphasizes the importance of judicial practice in addressing legislative gaps and providing clarity on various aspects of employee patent rights, including ownership, remuneration, formal procedures, and dispute resolution. Drawing comparisons with the German system, the article underscores the role of case law as a critical source of law in shaping the legal framework for employee patent rights. It concludes by highlighting the significance of ensuring inventors’ rights and fair compensation to foster innovation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42155,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Queen Mary Journal of Intellectual Property\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Queen Mary Journal of Intellectual Property\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4337/qmjip.2023.03.04\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Queen Mary Journal of Intellectual Property","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4337/qmjip.2023.03.04","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文考察了法国雇员专利权的演变情况,重点关注司法和立法途径。它突出了在缺乏明确所有权规定的法律框架内创造知识产权所带来的挑战。本文通过判例法和立法修正案的视角探讨了法国雇员专利权性质的变化。它强调了司法实践在解决立法空白和明确雇员专利权各个方面的重要性,包括所有权、报酬、正式程序和争议解决。通过与德国制度的比较,文章强调了判例法作为塑造雇员专利权法律框架的关键法律来源的作用。最后,报告强调了确保发明人权利和公平补偿对促进创新的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Judicial and legislative approaches to employee patent rights in France
This article examines the evolving landscape of employee patent rights in France, focusing on both judicial and legislative approaches. It highlights the challenges posed by intellectual property creation within legal frameworks that lack clear provisions for ownership. The article explores the changing nature of employee patent rights in France through the lens of case law and legislative amendments. It emphasizes the importance of judicial practice in addressing legislative gaps and providing clarity on various aspects of employee patent rights, including ownership, remuneration, formal procedures, and dispute resolution. Drawing comparisons with the German system, the article underscores the role of case law as a critical source of law in shaping the legal framework for employee patent rights. It concludes by highlighting the significance of ensuring inventors’ rights and fair compensation to foster innovation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信