原发性梗阻性脉管炎治疗方法的比较

Fatma ÖZCAN SIKI, Mehmet SARIKAYA, Metin GÜNDÜZ, Tamer SEKMENLİ, İlhan ÇİFTCİ, İsa YILMAZ, Harun PERU
{"title":"原发性梗阻性脉管炎治疗方法的比较","authors":"Fatma ÖZCAN SIKI, Mehmet SARIKAYA, Metin GÜNDÜZ, Tamer SEKMENLİ, İlhan ÇİFTCİ, İsa YILMAZ, Harun PERU","doi":"10.56766/ntms.1358523","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND: Primary megaureter (PM) is a common congenital uropathy. In this study, we compared the results of treatment options for primary megaureter with obstruction in UVJ.
 METHODS: The files of all patients who underwent open surgery and had a double J (JJ) ureteral stent for treating primary obstructive megaureter in our institution between 2010 and 2023 were evaluated retrospectively. The demographic information of the patients, the results of imaging tests before and after the surgery, early and late complications after the treatment, and the length of stay in the hospital were recorded. The results of both treatment methods were compared statistically.
 RESULTS: A total of 23 patients and 26 kidney units over 13 years were retrospectively analyzed. Eighteen patients were male (78%); 5 were girls (22%). Ureteral tapering and ureteroneocystostomy (UNC) were performed with open surgery in 8 patients, while JJ stent was placed in 12 patients primarily by cystoscopy. In the urinary system ultrasonography (USS) performed at an average of 3 months after the treatment, hydronephrosis grades were observed to regress in 25 units. All patients recovered after surgery and there was no significant difference between the two treatment methods (p> 0.05).
 CONCLUSION: In the treatment of primary obstructive megaureter (POM), endoscopic JJ stenting is as effective as ureteral reimplantation with open surgery. It may be considered more valuable due to the shorter hospital stay","PeriodicalId":371755,"journal":{"name":"New Trends in Medicine Sciences","volume":"160 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"COMPARISON OF TREATMENT METHODS OF PRIMARY OBSTRUCTIVE MEGAURETER\",\"authors\":\"Fatma ÖZCAN SIKI, Mehmet SARIKAYA, Metin GÜNDÜZ, Tamer SEKMENLİ, İlhan ÇİFTCİ, İsa YILMAZ, Harun PERU\",\"doi\":\"10.56766/ntms.1358523\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUND: Primary megaureter (PM) is a common congenital uropathy. In this study, we compared the results of treatment options for primary megaureter with obstruction in UVJ.
 METHODS: The files of all patients who underwent open surgery and had a double J (JJ) ureteral stent for treating primary obstructive megaureter in our institution between 2010 and 2023 were evaluated retrospectively. The demographic information of the patients, the results of imaging tests before and after the surgery, early and late complications after the treatment, and the length of stay in the hospital were recorded. The results of both treatment methods were compared statistically.
 RESULTS: A total of 23 patients and 26 kidney units over 13 years were retrospectively analyzed. Eighteen patients were male (78%); 5 were girls (22%). Ureteral tapering and ureteroneocystostomy (UNC) were performed with open surgery in 8 patients, while JJ stent was placed in 12 patients primarily by cystoscopy. In the urinary system ultrasonography (USS) performed at an average of 3 months after the treatment, hydronephrosis grades were observed to regress in 25 units. All patients recovered after surgery and there was no significant difference between the two treatment methods (p> 0.05).
 CONCLUSION: In the treatment of primary obstructive megaureter (POM), endoscopic JJ stenting is as effective as ureteral reimplantation with open surgery. It may be considered more valuable due to the shorter hospital stay\",\"PeriodicalId\":371755,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"New Trends in Medicine Sciences\",\"volume\":\"160 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"New Trends in Medicine Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.56766/ntms.1358523\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Trends in Medicine Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56766/ntms.1358523","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:原发性尿路病(PM)是一种常见的先天性尿路病。在这项研究中,我们比较了初级测量仪与UVJ梗阻的治疗方案的结果。方法:回顾性分析我院2010年至2023年间所有接受开放手术并植入双J (JJ)输尿管支架治疗原发性梗阻性血栓病患者的资料。记录患者的人口学信息、术前和术后影像学检查结果、治疗后的早期和晚期并发症以及住院时间。两种治疗方法的结果进行统计学比较。 结果:回顾性分析了13年来23例患者和26个肾脏单位。男性18例(78%);5例为女孩(22%)。8例患者行输尿管截细及输尿管膀胱造瘘术(UNC), 12例患者行JJ支架置入,主要通过膀胱镜检查。在治疗后平均3个月进行的泌尿系统超声检查(USS)中,观察到肾积水等级在25个单位中消退。所有患者术后均恢复,两种治疗方法无显著差异(p>0.05)强生# x0D;结论:内镜下JJ支架置入术治疗原发性梗阻性输尿管(POM)与开放手术输尿管再植术疗效相当。由于住院时间较短,因此可能被认为更有价值
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
COMPARISON OF TREATMENT METHODS OF PRIMARY OBSTRUCTIVE MEGAURETER
BACKGROUND: Primary megaureter (PM) is a common congenital uropathy. In this study, we compared the results of treatment options for primary megaureter with obstruction in UVJ. METHODS: The files of all patients who underwent open surgery and had a double J (JJ) ureteral stent for treating primary obstructive megaureter in our institution between 2010 and 2023 were evaluated retrospectively. The demographic information of the patients, the results of imaging tests before and after the surgery, early and late complications after the treatment, and the length of stay in the hospital were recorded. The results of both treatment methods were compared statistically. RESULTS: A total of 23 patients and 26 kidney units over 13 years were retrospectively analyzed. Eighteen patients were male (78%); 5 were girls (22%). Ureteral tapering and ureteroneocystostomy (UNC) were performed with open surgery in 8 patients, while JJ stent was placed in 12 patients primarily by cystoscopy. In the urinary system ultrasonography (USS) performed at an average of 3 months after the treatment, hydronephrosis grades were observed to regress in 25 units. All patients recovered after surgery and there was no significant difference between the two treatment methods (p> 0.05). CONCLUSION: In the treatment of primary obstructive megaureter (POM), endoscopic JJ stenting is as effective as ureteral reimplantation with open surgery. It may be considered more valuable due to the shorter hospital stay
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信