出版商身份的湮没

IF 0.1 0 PHILOSOPHY
Logos Pub Date : 2023-10-13 DOI:10.1163/18784712-03104062
Jaka Gerčar
{"title":"出版商身份的湮没","authors":"Jaka Gerčar","doi":"10.1163/18784712-03104062","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The title of this paper is taken from a chapter in Roberto Calasso’s The Art of the Publisher , in which the Italian publisher and writer notes a historical shift in contemporary publishing away from publishing as ‘form’, supposedly a publishing innovation of the first decade of the 20th century. Since Calasso never elaborated on his notion of publishing as form, this paper attempts to sketch the most important facets of this notion, embed it in the context of publishing theory, and suggest that it bears considerable similarities to auteur theory in cinema. After identifying three layers of publishing form, the author analyses how recent developments in contemporary publishing might relate to Calasso’s concern about the blurring of distinctions between publishers.","PeriodicalId":18064,"journal":{"name":"Logos","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Obliteration of Publisher Identity\",\"authors\":\"Jaka Gerčar\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/18784712-03104062\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract The title of this paper is taken from a chapter in Roberto Calasso’s The Art of the Publisher , in which the Italian publisher and writer notes a historical shift in contemporary publishing away from publishing as ‘form’, supposedly a publishing innovation of the first decade of the 20th century. Since Calasso never elaborated on his notion of publishing as form, this paper attempts to sketch the most important facets of this notion, embed it in the context of publishing theory, and suggest that it bears considerable similarities to auteur theory in cinema. After identifying three layers of publishing form, the author analyses how recent developments in contemporary publishing might relate to Calasso’s concern about the blurring of distinctions between publishers.\",\"PeriodicalId\":18064,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Logos\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Logos\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/18784712-03104062\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"PHILOSOPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Logos","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/18784712-03104062","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文的标题取自罗伯托·卡拉索的《出版商的艺术》中的一章,在这一章中,意大利出版商和作家注意到当代出版从“形式”出版的历史转变,据称是20世纪头十年的出版创新。由于卡拉索从未详细阐述过他的出版作为形式的概念,本文试图勾勒出这一概念的最重要方面,将其嵌入出版理论的背景下,并提出它与电影的导演理论有相当大的相似之处。在确定出版形式的三个层次之后,作者分析了当代出版的最新发展如何与卡拉索对出版商之间界限模糊的关注有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Obliteration of Publisher Identity
Abstract The title of this paper is taken from a chapter in Roberto Calasso’s The Art of the Publisher , in which the Italian publisher and writer notes a historical shift in contemporary publishing away from publishing as ‘form’, supposedly a publishing innovation of the first decade of the 20th century. Since Calasso never elaborated on his notion of publishing as form, this paper attempts to sketch the most important facets of this notion, embed it in the context of publishing theory, and suggest that it bears considerable similarities to auteur theory in cinema. After identifying three layers of publishing form, the author analyses how recent developments in contemporary publishing might relate to Calasso’s concern about the blurring of distinctions between publishers.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Logos
Logos PHILOSOPHY-
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
32 weeks
期刊介绍: Founded in 1991, Logos is a leading Russian-language bimestrial journal on philosophy, social and human sciences and cultural studies distributed among philosophers, scholars, most important libraries in Russia and abroad. Our issues include works by (and analyses of) many of the major figures in classical and contemporary thought, including E. Husserl, M. Heidegger, L. Wittgenstein, H.‑G. Gadamer, L. Binswanger, H. Arendt, K. Schmitt, I. Wallerstein, F. Jameson, J. Derrida, S. Zizek, Q. Maillassouxetc. Logos publishes pathbreaking work on a variety of traditional and «cutting-edge» topics (democracy, Plato, Spinoza, phenomenology, but also Queer Theory, Speculative Realism, Game Studies and so forth). It is heavily cited in the general philosophical literature all over the country.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信