COVID-19封锁对情绪的影响:性别、年龄和潜在疾病的影响

IF 1.2 Q4 PSYCHIATRY
Pantea Kiani, Pauline A. Hendriksen, Jessica Balikji, Noortje R. Severeijns, Annabel S. M. Sips, Gillian Bruce, Johan Garssen, Joris C. Verster
{"title":"COVID-19封锁对情绪的影响:性别、年龄和潜在疾病的影响","authors":"Pantea Kiani, Pauline A. Hendriksen, Jessica Balikji, Noortje R. Severeijns, Annabel S. M. Sips, Gillian Bruce, Johan Garssen, Joris C. Verster","doi":"10.3390/psychiatryint4040030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) lockdown periods had a significant negative impact on people’s lives and psychological well-being. However, the impact of lockdowns differed between individuals. This study aimed to identify vulnerable groups and investigated the relationship between mood and perceived immune fitness and the number and severity of coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) symptoms during the first COVID-19 lockdown in the Netherlands. In addition, the impact of emotion regulation and other preventive measures was considered. The aim of the study was to identify possible differences according to sex, age, and the presence of underlying disease. A two-part online survey among N = 1415 individuals of the Dutch population (18 to 94 years old) was conducted in the summer of 2020. N = 541 of these participants also completed part 2 of the survey. A series of questionnaires was completed on mood, quality of life, lifestyle, immune fitness, and the number and severity of COVID-19 symptoms. Retrospectively, the period before the first lockdown (15 January–14 March 2020) was compared with the first lockdown (15 March–11 May 2020). The analysis revealed that the lockdown period was associated with significantly poorer mood, poorer immune fitness, and reduced quality of life. Poorer mood was associated with a significantly reduced immune fitness and a significant increase in the number and severity of COVID-19 symptoms. Mood changes did not differ significantly between men and women. Some mood effects were significantly more pronounced for individuals with underlying diseases (depression, fatigue, and stress) and younger individuals (depression and loneliness). Regarding lifestyle factors, no significant lockdown effects were seen according to underlying disease status. During the lockdown period, women reported a decline in nutrition scores, which was not seen in men, whereas they reported receiving more support from family and friends than men. Regarding age, younger individuals reported a significantly greater negative impact on physical activity and being active than the older participants. No differential effects for the groups were found for health correlates. In conclusion, significant negative lockdown effects on mood, quality of life, and immune fitness were observed across the population. The effects were significantly more pronounced among young individuals and those with underlying disease.","PeriodicalId":93808,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatry international","volume":"46 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"COVID-19 Lockdown Effects on Mood: Impact of Sex, Age, and Underlying Disease\",\"authors\":\"Pantea Kiani, Pauline A. Hendriksen, Jessica Balikji, Noortje R. Severeijns, Annabel S. M. Sips, Gillian Bruce, Johan Garssen, Joris C. Verster\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/psychiatryint4040030\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) lockdown periods had a significant negative impact on people’s lives and psychological well-being. However, the impact of lockdowns differed between individuals. This study aimed to identify vulnerable groups and investigated the relationship between mood and perceived immune fitness and the number and severity of coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) symptoms during the first COVID-19 lockdown in the Netherlands. In addition, the impact of emotion regulation and other preventive measures was considered. The aim of the study was to identify possible differences according to sex, age, and the presence of underlying disease. A two-part online survey among N = 1415 individuals of the Dutch population (18 to 94 years old) was conducted in the summer of 2020. N = 541 of these participants also completed part 2 of the survey. A series of questionnaires was completed on mood, quality of life, lifestyle, immune fitness, and the number and severity of COVID-19 symptoms. Retrospectively, the period before the first lockdown (15 January–14 March 2020) was compared with the first lockdown (15 March–11 May 2020). The analysis revealed that the lockdown period was associated with significantly poorer mood, poorer immune fitness, and reduced quality of life. Poorer mood was associated with a significantly reduced immune fitness and a significant increase in the number and severity of COVID-19 symptoms. Mood changes did not differ significantly between men and women. Some mood effects were significantly more pronounced for individuals with underlying diseases (depression, fatigue, and stress) and younger individuals (depression and loneliness). Regarding lifestyle factors, no significant lockdown effects were seen according to underlying disease status. During the lockdown period, women reported a decline in nutrition scores, which was not seen in men, whereas they reported receiving more support from family and friends than men. Regarding age, younger individuals reported a significantly greater negative impact on physical activity and being active than the older participants. No differential effects for the groups were found for health correlates. In conclusion, significant negative lockdown effects on mood, quality of life, and immune fitness were observed across the population. The effects were significantly more pronounced among young individuals and those with underlying disease.\",\"PeriodicalId\":93808,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychiatry international\",\"volume\":\"46 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychiatry international\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/psychiatryint4040030\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychiatry international","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/psychiatryint4040030","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2019冠状病毒(COVID-19)封锁期对人们的生活和心理健康产生了重大负面影响。然而,封锁的影响因人而异。本研究旨在确定弱势群体,并调查荷兰首次COVID-19封锁期间情绪和感知免疫适应性与COVID-19症状数量和严重程度之间的关系。此外,还考虑了情绪调节等预防措施的影响。这项研究的目的是根据性别、年龄和潜在疾病的存在来确定可能的差异。2020年夏天,一项由两部分组成的在线调查对荷兰人口(18至94岁)的N = 1415人进行了调查。其中541名参与者还完成了调查的第二部分。完成了一系列关于情绪、生活质量、生活方式、免疫健康以及COVID-19症状数量和严重程度的问卷调查。回顾性地将首次封城前(2020年1月15日至3月14日)与首次封城后(2020年3月15日至5月11日)进行比较。分析显示,封锁期与情绪明显变差、免疫能力下降和生活质量下降有关。情绪较差与免疫适应性显着降低以及COVID-19症状的数量和严重程度显着增加有关。男性和女性的情绪变化没有显著差异。对于有潜在疾病(抑郁、疲劳和压力)和年轻人(抑郁和孤独)的人来说,一些情绪影响更为明显。至于生活方式因素,根据潜在疾病状况,没有发现明显的封锁效应。在封锁期间,女性报告营养评分下降,这在男性中没有出现,而她们报告从家人和朋友那里得到的支持比男性更多。在年龄方面,年轻人对身体活动和活跃程度的负面影响明显大于老年人。在健康相关方面,两组之间没有发现差异效应。总之,在人群中观察到对情绪,生活质量和免疫健康的显着负面封锁效应。这种影响在年轻人和那些有潜在疾病的人中更为明显。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
COVID-19 Lockdown Effects on Mood: Impact of Sex, Age, and Underlying Disease
Coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) lockdown periods had a significant negative impact on people’s lives and psychological well-being. However, the impact of lockdowns differed between individuals. This study aimed to identify vulnerable groups and investigated the relationship between mood and perceived immune fitness and the number and severity of coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) symptoms during the first COVID-19 lockdown in the Netherlands. In addition, the impact of emotion regulation and other preventive measures was considered. The aim of the study was to identify possible differences according to sex, age, and the presence of underlying disease. A two-part online survey among N = 1415 individuals of the Dutch population (18 to 94 years old) was conducted in the summer of 2020. N = 541 of these participants also completed part 2 of the survey. A series of questionnaires was completed on mood, quality of life, lifestyle, immune fitness, and the number and severity of COVID-19 symptoms. Retrospectively, the period before the first lockdown (15 January–14 March 2020) was compared with the first lockdown (15 March–11 May 2020). The analysis revealed that the lockdown period was associated with significantly poorer mood, poorer immune fitness, and reduced quality of life. Poorer mood was associated with a significantly reduced immune fitness and a significant increase in the number and severity of COVID-19 symptoms. Mood changes did not differ significantly between men and women. Some mood effects were significantly more pronounced for individuals with underlying diseases (depression, fatigue, and stress) and younger individuals (depression and loneliness). Regarding lifestyle factors, no significant lockdown effects were seen according to underlying disease status. During the lockdown period, women reported a decline in nutrition scores, which was not seen in men, whereas they reported receiving more support from family and friends than men. Regarding age, younger individuals reported a significantly greater negative impact on physical activity and being active than the older participants. No differential effects for the groups were found for health correlates. In conclusion, significant negative lockdown effects on mood, quality of life, and immune fitness were observed across the population. The effects were significantly more pronounced among young individuals and those with underlying disease.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信