税收竞争和国家援助

IF 0.3 Q3 LAW
Ruth Mason
{"title":"税收竞争和国家援助","authors":"Ruth Mason","doi":"10.1093/yel/yead001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract At the inception of a new and potentially transformative type of tax enforcement, this article reviews the goals underlying the prohibition on state aid, and, in particular, whether those goals properly encompass limitations on tax competition. To explore this question, this article examines treaty text and structure, doctrine, and policy arguments for and against using state aid to curb tax competition. It concludes that the European Commission’s expansion of state-aid doctrine to limit tax competition improperly constrains Member State tax autonomy, arrogates tax policy power to the unelected Commission, and increases legal uncertainty. This article urges the Court of Justice of the European Union to clarify that preventing tax competition is not an independent goal of state-aid enforcement, although limits on tax competition may arise instrumentally via a free-trade interpretation of the prohibition of state aid.","PeriodicalId":41752,"journal":{"name":"Croatian Yearbook of European Law & Policy","volume":"264 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tax competition and state aid\",\"authors\":\"Ruth Mason\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/yel/yead001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract At the inception of a new and potentially transformative type of tax enforcement, this article reviews the goals underlying the prohibition on state aid, and, in particular, whether those goals properly encompass limitations on tax competition. To explore this question, this article examines treaty text and structure, doctrine, and policy arguments for and against using state aid to curb tax competition. It concludes that the European Commission’s expansion of state-aid doctrine to limit tax competition improperly constrains Member State tax autonomy, arrogates tax policy power to the unelected Commission, and increases legal uncertainty. This article urges the Court of Justice of the European Union to clarify that preventing tax competition is not an independent goal of state-aid enforcement, although limits on tax competition may arise instrumentally via a free-trade interpretation of the prohibition of state aid.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41752,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Croatian Yearbook of European Law & Policy\",\"volume\":\"264 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Croatian Yearbook of European Law & Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/yel/yead001\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Croatian Yearbook of European Law & Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/yel/yead001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在一种新的、可能具有变革性的税收执法开始时,本文回顾了禁止国家援助的目标,特别是这些目标是否适当地包括对税收竞争的限制。为了探讨这个问题,本文考察了支持和反对使用国家援助来遏制税收竞争的条约文本和结构、理论和政策论点。它的结论是,欧盟委员会扩大国家援助原则以限制税收竞争,不恰当地限制了成员国的税收自主权,将税收政策权力剥夺给非选举产生的委员会,并增加了法律的不确定性。本文敦促欧盟法院澄清,防止税收竞争不是国家援助执法的独立目标,尽管通过对禁止国家援助的自由贸易解释,可能会产生对税收竞争的限制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Tax competition and state aid
Abstract At the inception of a new and potentially transformative type of tax enforcement, this article reviews the goals underlying the prohibition on state aid, and, in particular, whether those goals properly encompass limitations on tax competition. To explore this question, this article examines treaty text and structure, doctrine, and policy arguments for and against using state aid to curb tax competition. It concludes that the European Commission’s expansion of state-aid doctrine to limit tax competition improperly constrains Member State tax autonomy, arrogates tax policy power to the unelected Commission, and increases legal uncertainty. This article urges the Court of Justice of the European Union to clarify that preventing tax competition is not an independent goal of state-aid enforcement, although limits on tax competition may arise instrumentally via a free-trade interpretation of the prohibition of state aid.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
25 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信