碳酸盐岩储层注气效果与效率的系统实验研究

IF 2.1 4区 工程技术 Q3 ENERGY & FUELS
Shehadeh Masalmeh, S. Amir Farzaneh, Mehran Sohrabi, M. Saeid Ataei, Muataz Alshuaibi
{"title":"碳酸盐岩储层注气效果与效率的系统实验研究","authors":"Shehadeh Masalmeh, S. Amir Farzaneh, Mehran Sohrabi, M. Saeid Ataei, Muataz Alshuaibi","doi":"10.2118/200057-pa","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Summary Gas injection is the most widely applied recovery method in light, condensate, and volatile oil carbonate reservoirs. Gas has high displacement efficiency and usually results in a low residual oil saturation in the part of the reservoir that is contacted with gas. The displacement efficiency increases when the injected gas is near-miscible or miscible with the oil. In addition to nitrogen and hydrocarbon gas projects, carbon dioxide (CO2) enhanced oil recovery (EOR) has been the dominant gas EOR process. Gas-based EOR has been implemented in both mature and waterflooded carbonate reservoirs. In this paper, we present the results of a detailed experimental study aimed at understanding the performance and efficiency of gas injection in carbonate reservoirs. A series of immiscible and miscible gas injection coreflood experiments were performed using limestone reservoir cores under different injection strategies. To minimize laboratory artifacts, long cores were used in the experiments, and to observe the effect of gravity, both 2 in. diameter and 4 in. diameter (whole core) were used. The experiments were performed under reservoir conditions using live crude oil. The core wettability was restored by aging the core in crude oil for several weeks under reservoir temperature. Hydrocarbon gas (methane) was used as the immiscible injectant, and both CO2 and a mixture of 50% C1 and 50% CO2 were used as miscible injectant. All gas injection experiments were performed using vertically oriented cores, and the gas was injected from the top unless it is stated otherwise. The main parameters investigated in this study are as follows: The effect of miscibility on oil recovery for both continuous gas injection and water alternating gas (WAG). The effect of gravity on gas sweep efficiency compared to waterflooding. The effect of gas-oil interfacial tension (IFT) on oil recovery when using the same oil. The effect of oil type on oil recovery using the same injected gas at miscible and immiscible conditions. The effect of immiscible gas injection on subsequent miscible gas injection performance. Impact of CO2 cycle length on ultimate oil recovery. The impact of the order of fluid injection where multiple WAG injection cycles were performed in separate experiments after water or gas injection. The main conclusions of this study are as follows: As expected, miscibility has a significant impact on displacement efficiency and oil recovery where miscible gas recovered more than 20% extra oil compared to immiscible gas. A significant variation in oil recovery is observed for miscible gas injection (i.e., more than 10 saturation units difference) depending on the minimum miscibility pressure (MMP) between the injected gas and crude oil, even when both experiments are performed at miscible conditions using the same injected gas. The performance of tertiary CO2 flood was adversely affected by the slug of immiscible gas injected. Therefore, it is not recommended to have immiscible gas injection before miscible gas injection. Regardless of injected gas type, gas injection with similar IFTs achieved similar oil recovery. During WAG experiments, starting the injection cycles with water or gas did not have any impact on the ultimate oil recovery for both miscible and immiscible cases for one of the reservoirs, while WAG_G (WAG starting with gas injection) recovered more oil for another reservoir. Gravity has a significant impact on oil recovery for both miscible and immiscible gas injections. A significant difference is observed in oil recovery when comparing CO2 injection on 2-in.- and 4-in.-diameter core samples or when comparing horizontal vs. vertical immiscible gas injection and WAG experiment. The longer the CO2 slug size, the higher the oil recovery observed in gas injection experiments. The results of this study provide a rich and rarely available set of experimental data that can help improve and optimize gas and WAG injection in oil-wet carbonates.","PeriodicalId":22066,"journal":{"name":"SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Systematic Experimental Study to Understand the Performance and Efficiency of Gas Injection in Carbonate Reservoirs\",\"authors\":\"Shehadeh Masalmeh, S. Amir Farzaneh, Mehran Sohrabi, M. Saeid Ataei, Muataz Alshuaibi\",\"doi\":\"10.2118/200057-pa\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Summary Gas injection is the most widely applied recovery method in light, condensate, and volatile oil carbonate reservoirs. Gas has high displacement efficiency and usually results in a low residual oil saturation in the part of the reservoir that is contacted with gas. The displacement efficiency increases when the injected gas is near-miscible or miscible with the oil. In addition to nitrogen and hydrocarbon gas projects, carbon dioxide (CO2) enhanced oil recovery (EOR) has been the dominant gas EOR process. Gas-based EOR has been implemented in both mature and waterflooded carbonate reservoirs. In this paper, we present the results of a detailed experimental study aimed at understanding the performance and efficiency of gas injection in carbonate reservoirs. A series of immiscible and miscible gas injection coreflood experiments were performed using limestone reservoir cores under different injection strategies. To minimize laboratory artifacts, long cores were used in the experiments, and to observe the effect of gravity, both 2 in. diameter and 4 in. diameter (whole core) were used. The experiments were performed under reservoir conditions using live crude oil. The core wettability was restored by aging the core in crude oil for several weeks under reservoir temperature. Hydrocarbon gas (methane) was used as the immiscible injectant, and both CO2 and a mixture of 50% C1 and 50% CO2 were used as miscible injectant. All gas injection experiments were performed using vertically oriented cores, and the gas was injected from the top unless it is stated otherwise. The main parameters investigated in this study are as follows: The effect of miscibility on oil recovery for both continuous gas injection and water alternating gas (WAG). The effect of gravity on gas sweep efficiency compared to waterflooding. The effect of gas-oil interfacial tension (IFT) on oil recovery when using the same oil. The effect of oil type on oil recovery using the same injected gas at miscible and immiscible conditions. The effect of immiscible gas injection on subsequent miscible gas injection performance. Impact of CO2 cycle length on ultimate oil recovery. The impact of the order of fluid injection where multiple WAG injection cycles were performed in separate experiments after water or gas injection. The main conclusions of this study are as follows: As expected, miscibility has a significant impact on displacement efficiency and oil recovery where miscible gas recovered more than 20% extra oil compared to immiscible gas. A significant variation in oil recovery is observed for miscible gas injection (i.e., more than 10 saturation units difference) depending on the minimum miscibility pressure (MMP) between the injected gas and crude oil, even when both experiments are performed at miscible conditions using the same injected gas. The performance of tertiary CO2 flood was adversely affected by the slug of immiscible gas injected. Therefore, it is not recommended to have immiscible gas injection before miscible gas injection. Regardless of injected gas type, gas injection with similar IFTs achieved similar oil recovery. During WAG experiments, starting the injection cycles with water or gas did not have any impact on the ultimate oil recovery for both miscible and immiscible cases for one of the reservoirs, while WAG_G (WAG starting with gas injection) recovered more oil for another reservoir. Gravity has a significant impact on oil recovery for both miscible and immiscible gas injections. A significant difference is observed in oil recovery when comparing CO2 injection on 2-in.- and 4-in.-diameter core samples or when comparing horizontal vs. vertical immiscible gas injection and WAG experiment. The longer the CO2 slug size, the higher the oil recovery observed in gas injection experiments. The results of this study provide a rich and rarely available set of experimental data that can help improve and optimize gas and WAG injection in oil-wet carbonates.\",\"PeriodicalId\":22066,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2118/200057-pa\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/200057-pa","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

注气是轻质、凝析油和挥发油碳酸盐岩油藏中应用最广泛的采油方法。气驱替效率高,与气接触部分剩余油饱和度低。注气与油接近混相或混相时,驱替效率提高。除了氮气和碳氢气体项目外,二氧化碳(CO2)提高采收率(EOR)一直是天然气提高采收率的主要方法。在成熟和水淹的碳酸盐岩油藏中,气基提高采收率都得到了应用。在本文中,我们介绍了一项详细的实验研究结果,旨在了解碳酸盐岩储层的注气性能和效率。采用石灰岩储层岩心进行了不同注气策略下的非混相和混相注气岩心驱替实验。为了最大限度地减少实验室的人工制品,实验中使用了长芯,并观察重力的影响,2英寸。直径和4英寸。直径(全岩心)。实验是在使用活原油的油藏条件下进行的。在储层温度下,岩心在原油中老化数周,恢复了岩心的润湿性。烃类气体(甲烷)作为非混相注入剂,CO2和50% C1和50% CO2的混合物作为混相注入剂。所有注气实验均采用垂直定向岩心进行,除非另有说明,否则均从顶部注气。研究的主要参数包括:混相对连续注气和水交替注气采收率的影响;与水驱相比,重力对气驱效率的影响。研究了使用同一种油时,气-油界面张力对采收率的影响。在混相和非混相条件下,使用相同的注入气体,不同油型对采收率的影响。注非混相气对后续注混相气性能的影响。CO2循环长度对最终采收率的影响注水或注气后,在单独的实验中进行多个WAG注入循环对注液顺序的影响。本研究的主要结论如下:正如预期的那样,混相对驱替效率和采收率有显著影响,与非混相气相比,混相气的采收率高出20%以上。注混相气(即饱和度差超过10个单位)的采收率变化很大,这取决于注入气体和原油之间的最小混相压力(MMP),即使在使用相同注入气体的混相条件下进行两项实验。注非混相气段塞对三次CO2驱油性能有不利影响。因此,不建议在注混相气体前先注非混相气体。无论注入的气体类型如何,具有相似ift的气体注入获得了相似的采收率。在WAG实验中,对于一个储层的混相和非混相情况,以水或气开始注入循环对最终采收率没有任何影响,而WAG_G(以气开始注入的WAG)对另一个储层的采收率更高。重力对混相和非混相注气的采收率都有显著影响。与2-in井的CO2注入相比,采收率有显著差异。-和4英寸。-直径岩心样品或水平与垂直非混相注气和WAG实验比较时。注气实验表明,CO2段塞尺寸越长,采收率越高。该研究结果提供了一套丰富的、罕见的实验数据,可以帮助改善和优化油湿型碳酸盐岩中天然气和WAG的注入。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Systematic Experimental Study to Understand the Performance and Efficiency of Gas Injection in Carbonate Reservoirs
Summary Gas injection is the most widely applied recovery method in light, condensate, and volatile oil carbonate reservoirs. Gas has high displacement efficiency and usually results in a low residual oil saturation in the part of the reservoir that is contacted with gas. The displacement efficiency increases when the injected gas is near-miscible or miscible with the oil. In addition to nitrogen and hydrocarbon gas projects, carbon dioxide (CO2) enhanced oil recovery (EOR) has been the dominant gas EOR process. Gas-based EOR has been implemented in both mature and waterflooded carbonate reservoirs. In this paper, we present the results of a detailed experimental study aimed at understanding the performance and efficiency of gas injection in carbonate reservoirs. A series of immiscible and miscible gas injection coreflood experiments were performed using limestone reservoir cores under different injection strategies. To minimize laboratory artifacts, long cores were used in the experiments, and to observe the effect of gravity, both 2 in. diameter and 4 in. diameter (whole core) were used. The experiments were performed under reservoir conditions using live crude oil. The core wettability was restored by aging the core in crude oil for several weeks under reservoir temperature. Hydrocarbon gas (methane) was used as the immiscible injectant, and both CO2 and a mixture of 50% C1 and 50% CO2 were used as miscible injectant. All gas injection experiments were performed using vertically oriented cores, and the gas was injected from the top unless it is stated otherwise. The main parameters investigated in this study are as follows: The effect of miscibility on oil recovery for both continuous gas injection and water alternating gas (WAG). The effect of gravity on gas sweep efficiency compared to waterflooding. The effect of gas-oil interfacial tension (IFT) on oil recovery when using the same oil. The effect of oil type on oil recovery using the same injected gas at miscible and immiscible conditions. The effect of immiscible gas injection on subsequent miscible gas injection performance. Impact of CO2 cycle length on ultimate oil recovery. The impact of the order of fluid injection where multiple WAG injection cycles were performed in separate experiments after water or gas injection. The main conclusions of this study are as follows: As expected, miscibility has a significant impact on displacement efficiency and oil recovery where miscible gas recovered more than 20% extra oil compared to immiscible gas. A significant variation in oil recovery is observed for miscible gas injection (i.e., more than 10 saturation units difference) depending on the minimum miscibility pressure (MMP) between the injected gas and crude oil, even when both experiments are performed at miscible conditions using the same injected gas. The performance of tertiary CO2 flood was adversely affected by the slug of immiscible gas injected. Therefore, it is not recommended to have immiscible gas injection before miscible gas injection. Regardless of injected gas type, gas injection with similar IFTs achieved similar oil recovery. During WAG experiments, starting the injection cycles with water or gas did not have any impact on the ultimate oil recovery for both miscible and immiscible cases for one of the reservoirs, while WAG_G (WAG starting with gas injection) recovered more oil for another reservoir. Gravity has a significant impact on oil recovery for both miscible and immiscible gas injections. A significant difference is observed in oil recovery when comparing CO2 injection on 2-in.- and 4-in.-diameter core samples or when comparing horizontal vs. vertical immiscible gas injection and WAG experiment. The longer the CO2 slug size, the higher the oil recovery observed in gas injection experiments. The results of this study provide a rich and rarely available set of experimental data that can help improve and optimize gas and WAG injection in oil-wet carbonates.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
68
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: Covers the application of a wide range of topics, including reservoir characterization, geology and geophysics, core analysis, well logging, well testing, reservoir management, enhanced oil recovery, fluid mechanics, performance prediction, reservoir simulation, digital energy, uncertainty/risk assessment, information management, resource and reserve evaluation, portfolio/asset management, project valuation, and petroleum economics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信