Shehadeh Masalmeh, S. Amir Farzaneh, Mehran Sohrabi, M. Saeid Ataei, Muataz Alshuaibi
{"title":"碳酸盐岩储层注气效果与效率的系统实验研究","authors":"Shehadeh Masalmeh, S. Amir Farzaneh, Mehran Sohrabi, M. Saeid Ataei, Muataz Alshuaibi","doi":"10.2118/200057-pa","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Summary Gas injection is the most widely applied recovery method in light, condensate, and volatile oil carbonate reservoirs. Gas has high displacement efficiency and usually results in a low residual oil saturation in the part of the reservoir that is contacted with gas. The displacement efficiency increases when the injected gas is near-miscible or miscible with the oil. In addition to nitrogen and hydrocarbon gas projects, carbon dioxide (CO2) enhanced oil recovery (EOR) has been the dominant gas EOR process. Gas-based EOR has been implemented in both mature and waterflooded carbonate reservoirs. In this paper, we present the results of a detailed experimental study aimed at understanding the performance and efficiency of gas injection in carbonate reservoirs. A series of immiscible and miscible gas injection coreflood experiments were performed using limestone reservoir cores under different injection strategies. To minimize laboratory artifacts, long cores were used in the experiments, and to observe the effect of gravity, both 2 in. diameter and 4 in. diameter (whole core) were used. The experiments were performed under reservoir conditions using live crude oil. The core wettability was restored by aging the core in crude oil for several weeks under reservoir temperature. Hydrocarbon gas (methane) was used as the immiscible injectant, and both CO2 and a mixture of 50% C1 and 50% CO2 were used as miscible injectant. All gas injection experiments were performed using vertically oriented cores, and the gas was injected from the top unless it is stated otherwise. The main parameters investigated in this study are as follows: The effect of miscibility on oil recovery for both continuous gas injection and water alternating gas (WAG). The effect of gravity on gas sweep efficiency compared to waterflooding. The effect of gas-oil interfacial tension (IFT) on oil recovery when using the same oil. The effect of oil type on oil recovery using the same injected gas at miscible and immiscible conditions. The effect of immiscible gas injection on subsequent miscible gas injection performance. Impact of CO2 cycle length on ultimate oil recovery. The impact of the order of fluid injection where multiple WAG injection cycles were performed in separate experiments after water or gas injection. The main conclusions of this study are as follows: As expected, miscibility has a significant impact on displacement efficiency and oil recovery where miscible gas recovered more than 20% extra oil compared to immiscible gas. A significant variation in oil recovery is observed for miscible gas injection (i.e., more than 10 saturation units difference) depending on the minimum miscibility pressure (MMP) between the injected gas and crude oil, even when both experiments are performed at miscible conditions using the same injected gas. The performance of tertiary CO2 flood was adversely affected by the slug of immiscible gas injected. Therefore, it is not recommended to have immiscible gas injection before miscible gas injection. Regardless of injected gas type, gas injection with similar IFTs achieved similar oil recovery. During WAG experiments, starting the injection cycles with water or gas did not have any impact on the ultimate oil recovery for both miscible and immiscible cases for one of the reservoirs, while WAG_G (WAG starting with gas injection) recovered more oil for another reservoir. Gravity has a significant impact on oil recovery for both miscible and immiscible gas injections. A significant difference is observed in oil recovery when comparing CO2 injection on 2-in.- and 4-in.-diameter core samples or when comparing horizontal vs. vertical immiscible gas injection and WAG experiment. The longer the CO2 slug size, the higher the oil recovery observed in gas injection experiments. The results of this study provide a rich and rarely available set of experimental data that can help improve and optimize gas and WAG injection in oil-wet carbonates.","PeriodicalId":22066,"journal":{"name":"SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Systematic Experimental Study to Understand the Performance and Efficiency of Gas Injection in Carbonate Reservoirs\",\"authors\":\"Shehadeh Masalmeh, S. Amir Farzaneh, Mehran Sohrabi, M. Saeid Ataei, Muataz Alshuaibi\",\"doi\":\"10.2118/200057-pa\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Summary Gas injection is the most widely applied recovery method in light, condensate, and volatile oil carbonate reservoirs. Gas has high displacement efficiency and usually results in a low residual oil saturation in the part of the reservoir that is contacted with gas. The displacement efficiency increases when the injected gas is near-miscible or miscible with the oil. In addition to nitrogen and hydrocarbon gas projects, carbon dioxide (CO2) enhanced oil recovery (EOR) has been the dominant gas EOR process. Gas-based EOR has been implemented in both mature and waterflooded carbonate reservoirs. In this paper, we present the results of a detailed experimental study aimed at understanding the performance and efficiency of gas injection in carbonate reservoirs. A series of immiscible and miscible gas injection coreflood experiments were performed using limestone reservoir cores under different injection strategies. To minimize laboratory artifacts, long cores were used in the experiments, and to observe the effect of gravity, both 2 in. diameter and 4 in. diameter (whole core) were used. The experiments were performed under reservoir conditions using live crude oil. The core wettability was restored by aging the core in crude oil for several weeks under reservoir temperature. Hydrocarbon gas (methane) was used as the immiscible injectant, and both CO2 and a mixture of 50% C1 and 50% CO2 were used as miscible injectant. All gas injection experiments were performed using vertically oriented cores, and the gas was injected from the top unless it is stated otherwise. The main parameters investigated in this study are as follows: The effect of miscibility on oil recovery for both continuous gas injection and water alternating gas (WAG). The effect of gravity on gas sweep efficiency compared to waterflooding. The effect of gas-oil interfacial tension (IFT) on oil recovery when using the same oil. The effect of oil type on oil recovery using the same injected gas at miscible and immiscible conditions. The effect of immiscible gas injection on subsequent miscible gas injection performance. Impact of CO2 cycle length on ultimate oil recovery. The impact of the order of fluid injection where multiple WAG injection cycles were performed in separate experiments after water or gas injection. The main conclusions of this study are as follows: As expected, miscibility has a significant impact on displacement efficiency and oil recovery where miscible gas recovered more than 20% extra oil compared to immiscible gas. A significant variation in oil recovery is observed for miscible gas injection (i.e., more than 10 saturation units difference) depending on the minimum miscibility pressure (MMP) between the injected gas and crude oil, even when both experiments are performed at miscible conditions using the same injected gas. The performance of tertiary CO2 flood was adversely affected by the slug of immiscible gas injected. Therefore, it is not recommended to have immiscible gas injection before miscible gas injection. Regardless of injected gas type, gas injection with similar IFTs achieved similar oil recovery. During WAG experiments, starting the injection cycles with water or gas did not have any impact on the ultimate oil recovery for both miscible and immiscible cases for one of the reservoirs, while WAG_G (WAG starting with gas injection) recovered more oil for another reservoir. Gravity has a significant impact on oil recovery for both miscible and immiscible gas injections. A significant difference is observed in oil recovery when comparing CO2 injection on 2-in.- and 4-in.-diameter core samples or when comparing horizontal vs. vertical immiscible gas injection and WAG experiment. The longer the CO2 slug size, the higher the oil recovery observed in gas injection experiments. The results of this study provide a rich and rarely available set of experimental data that can help improve and optimize gas and WAG injection in oil-wet carbonates.\",\"PeriodicalId\":22066,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2118/200057-pa\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/200057-pa","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
A Systematic Experimental Study to Understand the Performance and Efficiency of Gas Injection in Carbonate Reservoirs
Summary Gas injection is the most widely applied recovery method in light, condensate, and volatile oil carbonate reservoirs. Gas has high displacement efficiency and usually results in a low residual oil saturation in the part of the reservoir that is contacted with gas. The displacement efficiency increases when the injected gas is near-miscible or miscible with the oil. In addition to nitrogen and hydrocarbon gas projects, carbon dioxide (CO2) enhanced oil recovery (EOR) has been the dominant gas EOR process. Gas-based EOR has been implemented in both mature and waterflooded carbonate reservoirs. In this paper, we present the results of a detailed experimental study aimed at understanding the performance and efficiency of gas injection in carbonate reservoirs. A series of immiscible and miscible gas injection coreflood experiments were performed using limestone reservoir cores under different injection strategies. To minimize laboratory artifacts, long cores were used in the experiments, and to observe the effect of gravity, both 2 in. diameter and 4 in. diameter (whole core) were used. The experiments were performed under reservoir conditions using live crude oil. The core wettability was restored by aging the core in crude oil for several weeks under reservoir temperature. Hydrocarbon gas (methane) was used as the immiscible injectant, and both CO2 and a mixture of 50% C1 and 50% CO2 were used as miscible injectant. All gas injection experiments were performed using vertically oriented cores, and the gas was injected from the top unless it is stated otherwise. The main parameters investigated in this study are as follows: The effect of miscibility on oil recovery for both continuous gas injection and water alternating gas (WAG). The effect of gravity on gas sweep efficiency compared to waterflooding. The effect of gas-oil interfacial tension (IFT) on oil recovery when using the same oil. The effect of oil type on oil recovery using the same injected gas at miscible and immiscible conditions. The effect of immiscible gas injection on subsequent miscible gas injection performance. Impact of CO2 cycle length on ultimate oil recovery. The impact of the order of fluid injection where multiple WAG injection cycles were performed in separate experiments after water or gas injection. The main conclusions of this study are as follows: As expected, miscibility has a significant impact on displacement efficiency and oil recovery where miscible gas recovered more than 20% extra oil compared to immiscible gas. A significant variation in oil recovery is observed for miscible gas injection (i.e., more than 10 saturation units difference) depending on the minimum miscibility pressure (MMP) between the injected gas and crude oil, even when both experiments are performed at miscible conditions using the same injected gas. The performance of tertiary CO2 flood was adversely affected by the slug of immiscible gas injected. Therefore, it is not recommended to have immiscible gas injection before miscible gas injection. Regardless of injected gas type, gas injection with similar IFTs achieved similar oil recovery. During WAG experiments, starting the injection cycles with water or gas did not have any impact on the ultimate oil recovery for both miscible and immiscible cases for one of the reservoirs, while WAG_G (WAG starting with gas injection) recovered more oil for another reservoir. Gravity has a significant impact on oil recovery for both miscible and immiscible gas injections. A significant difference is observed in oil recovery when comparing CO2 injection on 2-in.- and 4-in.-diameter core samples or when comparing horizontal vs. vertical immiscible gas injection and WAG experiment. The longer the CO2 slug size, the higher the oil recovery observed in gas injection experiments. The results of this study provide a rich and rarely available set of experimental data that can help improve and optimize gas and WAG injection in oil-wet carbonates.
期刊介绍:
Covers the application of a wide range of topics, including reservoir characterization, geology and geophysics, core analysis, well logging, well testing, reservoir management, enhanced oil recovery, fluid mechanics, performance prediction, reservoir simulation, digital energy, uncertainty/risk assessment, information management, resource and reserve evaluation, portfolio/asset management, project valuation, and petroleum economics.