从南非的角度对外国子投资组合进行基准配置

Q4 Economics, Econometrics and Finance
J. Rudolph, D. J. Bradfield
{"title":"从南非的角度对外国子投资组合进行基准配置","authors":"J. Rudolph, D. J. Bradfield","doi":"10.1080/03796205.2023.2252184","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This paper responds to the recent (2022) change to Regulation 28 of the South African Pension Funds Act which now permits an increased allocation (raised from 30% to 45%) in foreign investments. Our primary aim is to establish a strategic (long-term) benchmark weight for the allocation to foreign assets. Our secondary aim is to assist in building intuition on potential tactical (shorter-term) foreign allocation decisions. To ensure rigour in our study, we use a novel dataset dating back to the 1930s and we utilise methodologies in recent academic literature in the mean-variance framework. Our optimisation evidence supports a strategic foreign benchmark allocation of 39% (with 61% allocated to local asset classes). We highlight that this strategic foreign benchmark of 39% (probably for the first time) enables managers to potentially take on meaningful tactical overweight foreign positions. We establish that this strategic foreign benchmark would have reduced the risk (standard deviation of returns) of the local-only optimal portfolio significantly from 10% p.a. down to 8.7% p.a. over the 92 year period analysed, whilst increasing the return by an additional 1.1% p.a. over the local-only portfolio. Lastly, we provide guidance on tactical foreign allocation decisions based on four potential local economic regimes.","PeriodicalId":55873,"journal":{"name":"Journal for Studies in Economics and Econometrics","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Benchmarking an allocation to the foreign Sub-portfolio from a South African perspective\",\"authors\":\"J. Rudolph, D. J. Bradfield\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/03796205.2023.2252184\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract This paper responds to the recent (2022) change to Regulation 28 of the South African Pension Funds Act which now permits an increased allocation (raised from 30% to 45%) in foreign investments. Our primary aim is to establish a strategic (long-term) benchmark weight for the allocation to foreign assets. Our secondary aim is to assist in building intuition on potential tactical (shorter-term) foreign allocation decisions. To ensure rigour in our study, we use a novel dataset dating back to the 1930s and we utilise methodologies in recent academic literature in the mean-variance framework. Our optimisation evidence supports a strategic foreign benchmark allocation of 39% (with 61% allocated to local asset classes). We highlight that this strategic foreign benchmark of 39% (probably for the first time) enables managers to potentially take on meaningful tactical overweight foreign positions. We establish that this strategic foreign benchmark would have reduced the risk (standard deviation of returns) of the local-only optimal portfolio significantly from 10% p.a. down to 8.7% p.a. over the 92 year period analysed, whilst increasing the return by an additional 1.1% p.a. over the local-only portfolio. Lastly, we provide guidance on tactical foreign allocation decisions based on four potential local economic regimes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":55873,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal for Studies in Economics and Econometrics\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal for Studies in Economics and Econometrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/03796205.2023.2252184\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Economics, Econometrics and Finance\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal for Studies in Economics and Econometrics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03796205.2023.2252184","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Benchmarking an allocation to the foreign Sub-portfolio from a South African perspective
Abstract This paper responds to the recent (2022) change to Regulation 28 of the South African Pension Funds Act which now permits an increased allocation (raised from 30% to 45%) in foreign investments. Our primary aim is to establish a strategic (long-term) benchmark weight for the allocation to foreign assets. Our secondary aim is to assist in building intuition on potential tactical (shorter-term) foreign allocation decisions. To ensure rigour in our study, we use a novel dataset dating back to the 1930s and we utilise methodologies in recent academic literature in the mean-variance framework. Our optimisation evidence supports a strategic foreign benchmark allocation of 39% (with 61% allocated to local asset classes). We highlight that this strategic foreign benchmark of 39% (probably for the first time) enables managers to potentially take on meaningful tactical overweight foreign positions. We establish that this strategic foreign benchmark would have reduced the risk (standard deviation of returns) of the local-only optimal portfolio significantly from 10% p.a. down to 8.7% p.a. over the 92 year period analysed, whilst increasing the return by an additional 1.1% p.a. over the local-only portfolio. Lastly, we provide guidance on tactical foreign allocation decisions based on four potential local economic regimes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal for Studies in Economics and Econometrics
Journal for Studies in Economics and Econometrics Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics and Econometrics
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
期刊介绍: Published by the Bureau for Economic Research and the Graduate School of Business, University of Stellenbosch. Articles in the field of study of Economics (in the widest sense of the word).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信