动物、植物或事物有脸吗?列维纳斯、迪耶姆与生态现象学

Q3 Arts and Humanities
Reflexe Pub Date : 2023-10-02 DOI:10.14712/25337637.2023.23
Petr Prášek
{"title":"动物、植物或事物有脸吗?列维纳斯、迪耶姆与生态现象学","authors":"Petr Prášek","doi":"10.14712/25337637.2023.23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Eco-phenomenology is a young branch of contemporary phenomenology and environmental ethics that attempts to put aside all preconceptions burdening the relationship between humans and nature, to describe it purely on the basis of how it appears phenomenologically, and to draw ethical implications that could contribute to solving the ecological crisis. Authors inspired by Levinas’ ethics play an important role in this project, asking whether it could be extended to non-human beings. The article addresses two of them in particular: it shows how Ch. Diehm – who sees the core of Levinas’ ethics in sensitivity to the suffering of the vulnerable body – succeeded in comparison to his predecessor S. Benso and her ethics of things, but also marks the limits of his attempt, thus indicating what remains a challenge for Levinas-inspired eco-phenomenology in the future.","PeriodicalId":53484,"journal":{"name":"Reflexe","volume":"59 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mají zvířata, rostliny či věci svou tvář? Lévinas, Diehm a eko-fenomenologie\",\"authors\":\"Petr Prášek\",\"doi\":\"10.14712/25337637.2023.23\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Eco-phenomenology is a young branch of contemporary phenomenology and environmental ethics that attempts to put aside all preconceptions burdening the relationship between humans and nature, to describe it purely on the basis of how it appears phenomenologically, and to draw ethical implications that could contribute to solving the ecological crisis. Authors inspired by Levinas’ ethics play an important role in this project, asking whether it could be extended to non-human beings. The article addresses two of them in particular: it shows how Ch. Diehm – who sees the core of Levinas’ ethics in sensitivity to the suffering of the vulnerable body – succeeded in comparison to his predecessor S. Benso and her ethics of things, but also marks the limits of his attempt, thus indicating what remains a challenge for Levinas-inspired eco-phenomenology in the future.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53484,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Reflexe\",\"volume\":\"59 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Reflexe\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14712/25337637.2023.23\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reflexe","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14712/25337637.2023.23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

生态现象学是当代现象学和环境伦理学的一个年轻分支,它试图抛开所有影响人与自然关系的先入为主的观念,纯粹基于它的现象学表现来描述它,并得出可能有助于解决生态危机的伦理含义。受列维纳斯伦理学启发的作家在这个项目中发挥了重要作用,他们询问是否可以将其扩展到非人类。这篇文章特别讨论了其中的两个问题:它展示了迪厄姆——他认为列维纳斯伦理学的核心在于对脆弱身体的痛苦的敏感——与他的前任s·本索及其物的伦理学相比是如何成功的,但也标志着他的尝试的局限性,从而表明了列维纳斯启发的生态现象学在未来仍然面临的挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Mají zvířata, rostliny či věci svou tvář? Lévinas, Diehm a eko-fenomenologie
Eco-phenomenology is a young branch of contemporary phenomenology and environmental ethics that attempts to put aside all preconceptions burdening the relationship between humans and nature, to describe it purely on the basis of how it appears phenomenologically, and to draw ethical implications that could contribute to solving the ecological crisis. Authors inspired by Levinas’ ethics play an important role in this project, asking whether it could be extended to non-human beings. The article addresses two of them in particular: it shows how Ch. Diehm – who sees the core of Levinas’ ethics in sensitivity to the suffering of the vulnerable body – succeeded in comparison to his predecessor S. Benso and her ethics of things, but also marks the limits of his attempt, thus indicating what remains a challenge for Levinas-inspired eco-phenomenology in the future.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Reflexe
Reflexe Arts and Humanities-Philosophy
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
30
审稿时长
25 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信