一个行会,两个商人,公共财产。18世纪纺织制造业的社会资本危机

IF 0.4 4区 历史学 Q4 BUSINESS
José M. Lana Berasain
{"title":"一个行会,两个商人,公共财产。18世纪纺织制造业的社会资本危机","authors":"José M. Lana Berasain","doi":"10.1344/rhiihr.41898","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A case study of the wool carders’ guild in Estella-Lizarra (Navarre) from the sixteenth to nineteenth centuries questions prevalent opinions among historians, which have tended to define these collective action institutions as monopolies. This study complements the traditional ‘outside in’ approach that considers the guild to be a monolithic agent, adopting an inside perspective that reveals the tensions between collective and individual interests. The research focuses on the collective management of common properties (fulling-mill and dyeing house) until their disappearance in 1758, and guild relations with commercial capital in the form of a major financial sponsor and a new factory. Difficulties associated with the guild’s financial management and the loss of its social capital lay at the heart of its troubles.","PeriodicalId":44226,"journal":{"name":"Revista De Historia Industrial","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"One guild, two merchants, and common property. A social capital crisis in textile manufacturing during the eighteenth century\",\"authors\":\"José M. Lana Berasain\",\"doi\":\"10.1344/rhiihr.41898\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A case study of the wool carders’ guild in Estella-Lizarra (Navarre) from the sixteenth to nineteenth centuries questions prevalent opinions among historians, which have tended to define these collective action institutions as monopolies. This study complements the traditional ‘outside in’ approach that considers the guild to be a monolithic agent, adopting an inside perspective that reveals the tensions between collective and individual interests. The research focuses on the collective management of common properties (fulling-mill and dyeing house) until their disappearance in 1758, and guild relations with commercial capital in the form of a major financial sponsor and a new factory. Difficulties associated with the guild’s financial management and the loss of its social capital lay at the heart of its troubles.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44226,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista De Historia Industrial\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista De Historia Industrial\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1344/rhiihr.41898\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista De Historia Industrial","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1344/rhiihr.41898","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对16世纪至19世纪埃斯特拉-利萨拉(纳瓦拉)羊毛工匠公会的案例研究质疑了历史学家的普遍观点,这些观点倾向于将这些集体行动机构定义为垄断。这项研究补充了传统的“由外而内”的方法,将公会视为一个整体代理,采用了内部视角,揭示了集体和个人利益之间的紧张关系。研究的重点是共同财产的集体管理(纺织厂和印染厂),直到它们在1758年消失,以及行会与商业资本的关系,以主要的金融赞助商和新工厂的形式。公会财务管理的困难和社会资本的损失是其问题的核心。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
One guild, two merchants, and common property. A social capital crisis in textile manufacturing during the eighteenth century
A case study of the wool carders’ guild in Estella-Lizarra (Navarre) from the sixteenth to nineteenth centuries questions prevalent opinions among historians, which have tended to define these collective action institutions as monopolies. This study complements the traditional ‘outside in’ approach that considers the guild to be a monolithic agent, adopting an inside perspective that reveals the tensions between collective and individual interests. The research focuses on the collective management of common properties (fulling-mill and dyeing house) until their disappearance in 1758, and guild relations with commercial capital in the form of a major financial sponsor and a new factory. Difficulties associated with the guild’s financial management and the loss of its social capital lay at the heart of its troubles.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信