{"title":"更好,更快,更强:语言样本转录和编码训练研究的结果","authors":"Diane A Ogiela, Sarah A Aldrich","doi":"10.61403/2689-6443.1289","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although language sample analysis (LSA) is considered an important tool for high-quality child language assessment, surveys have found that its use is quite limited by school-based speech-language pathologists (SLPs). Two of the reasons often cited are limited time and limited expertise (Kemp & Klee, 1997; Pavelko et al., 2016). This study aims to evaluate the outcomes of a language sample training program on SLP students’ accuracy, efficiency, and confidence with language sample transcription and coding. Upper-division SLP undergraduates and graduate students participated in a self-paced language sample training and practice program. Participants completed online language transcription and coding training and practiced transcribing 7-10 narrative child language samples. After each one, they entered information into the quiz tool in the university’s online learning management system and received automated, individualized, and specific feedback. The accuracy and time needed for the language transcriptions were recorded and analyzed. The results indicated that the participants significantly increased their accuracy and reduced the time needed for transcription and coding. They also reported a significant increase in their confidence level with language sample transcription. The results suggest that increased training and practice opportunities that involve specific feedback will better prepare new clinicians to use language sample analysis in clinical practice.","PeriodicalId":490595,"journal":{"name":"Teaching and learning in communication sciences and disorders","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Better, Faster, Stronger: Outcomes of a Language Sample Transcription and Coding Training Study\",\"authors\":\"Diane A Ogiela, Sarah A Aldrich\",\"doi\":\"10.61403/2689-6443.1289\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Although language sample analysis (LSA) is considered an important tool for high-quality child language assessment, surveys have found that its use is quite limited by school-based speech-language pathologists (SLPs). Two of the reasons often cited are limited time and limited expertise (Kemp & Klee, 1997; Pavelko et al., 2016). This study aims to evaluate the outcomes of a language sample training program on SLP students’ accuracy, efficiency, and confidence with language sample transcription and coding. Upper-division SLP undergraduates and graduate students participated in a self-paced language sample training and practice program. Participants completed online language transcription and coding training and practiced transcribing 7-10 narrative child language samples. After each one, they entered information into the quiz tool in the university’s online learning management system and received automated, individualized, and specific feedback. The accuracy and time needed for the language transcriptions were recorded and analyzed. The results indicated that the participants significantly increased their accuracy and reduced the time needed for transcription and coding. They also reported a significant increase in their confidence level with language sample transcription. The results suggest that increased training and practice opportunities that involve specific feedback will better prepare new clinicians to use language sample analysis in clinical practice.\",\"PeriodicalId\":490595,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Teaching and learning in communication sciences and disorders\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Teaching and learning in communication sciences and disorders\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.61403/2689-6443.1289\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Teaching and learning in communication sciences and disorders","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.61403/2689-6443.1289","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
虽然语言样本分析(LSA)被认为是高质量儿童语言评估的重要工具,但调查发现,以学校为基础的语言病理学家(slp)对其使用相当有限。经常被引用的两个原因是有限的时间和有限的专业知识(Kemp & Klee, 1997;Pavelko et al., 2016)。本研究旨在评估语言样本训练计划对SLP学生在语言样本转录和编码方面的准确性、效率和信心的影响。高年级语言语言专业本科生和研究生参加了一个自定进度的语言样本训练和实践项目。参与者完成了在线语言转录和编码培训,并练习转录7-10个叙事儿童语言样本。每次考试结束后,他们将信息输入到大学在线学习管理系统的测验工具中,并收到自动的、个性化的、特定的反馈。记录和分析语言转录的准确性和所需的时间。结果表明,参与者显著提高了他们的准确性,减少了转录和编码所需的时间。他们还报告说,他们对语言样本转录的信心水平显著提高。结果表明,增加涉及具体反馈的培训和实践机会将更好地为新临床医生在临床实践中使用语言样本分析做好准备。
Better, Faster, Stronger: Outcomes of a Language Sample Transcription and Coding Training Study
Although language sample analysis (LSA) is considered an important tool for high-quality child language assessment, surveys have found that its use is quite limited by school-based speech-language pathologists (SLPs). Two of the reasons often cited are limited time and limited expertise (Kemp & Klee, 1997; Pavelko et al., 2016). This study aims to evaluate the outcomes of a language sample training program on SLP students’ accuracy, efficiency, and confidence with language sample transcription and coding. Upper-division SLP undergraduates and graduate students participated in a self-paced language sample training and practice program. Participants completed online language transcription and coding training and practiced transcribing 7-10 narrative child language samples. After each one, they entered information into the quiz tool in the university’s online learning management system and received automated, individualized, and specific feedback. The accuracy and time needed for the language transcriptions were recorded and analyzed. The results indicated that the participants significantly increased their accuracy and reduced the time needed for transcription and coding. They also reported a significant increase in their confidence level with language sample transcription. The results suggest that increased training and practice opportunities that involve specific feedback will better prepare new clinicians to use language sample analysis in clinical practice.