岩土稳定性分析中的集合机器学习综合评估及可解释性

IF 2.7 3区 材料科学 Q2 ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL
Shan Lin, Zenglong Liang, Shuaixing Zhao, Miao Dong, Hongwei Guo, Hong Zheng
{"title":"岩土稳定性分析中的集合机器学习综合评估及可解释性","authors":"Shan Lin,&nbsp;Zenglong Liang,&nbsp;Shuaixing Zhao,&nbsp;Miao Dong,&nbsp;Hongwei Guo,&nbsp;Hong Zheng","doi":"10.1007/s10999-023-09679-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>We investigated the application of ensemble learning approaches in geotechnical stability analysis and proposed a compound explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) fitted to ensemble learning. 742 sets of data from real-world geotechnical engineering records are collected and six critical features that contribute to the stability analysis are selected. First, we visualized the data structure and examined the relationships between various features from both a statistical and an engineering standpoint. Seven state-of-the-art ensemble models and several classical machine learning models were compared and evaluated on slope stability prediction using real-world data. Further, we studied model fusion using the stacking strategy and the performance of model fusion that contributes to slope stability prediction. The results manifested that the ensemble learning model outperformed the classical single predictive models, with the CatBoost model yielding the most favourable results. To dive deeper into the credibility and explainability of CatBoost composed of multiple learners, the compound XAI fitted to CatBoost was formulated using feature importance, sensitivity analysis, and Shapley additive explanation (SHAP), which further strengthened the credibility of ensemble learning in geotechnical stability analysis.</p><h3>Graphical abstract</h3>\n<div><figure><div><div><picture><source><img></source></picture></div></div></figure></div></div>","PeriodicalId":593,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Mechanics and Materials in Design","volume":"20 2","pages":"331 - 352"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comprehensive evaluation of ensemble machine learning in geotechnical stability analysis and explainability\",\"authors\":\"Shan Lin,&nbsp;Zenglong Liang,&nbsp;Shuaixing Zhao,&nbsp;Miao Dong,&nbsp;Hongwei Guo,&nbsp;Hong Zheng\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10999-023-09679-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>We investigated the application of ensemble learning approaches in geotechnical stability analysis and proposed a compound explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) fitted to ensemble learning. 742 sets of data from real-world geotechnical engineering records are collected and six critical features that contribute to the stability analysis are selected. First, we visualized the data structure and examined the relationships between various features from both a statistical and an engineering standpoint. Seven state-of-the-art ensemble models and several classical machine learning models were compared and evaluated on slope stability prediction using real-world data. Further, we studied model fusion using the stacking strategy and the performance of model fusion that contributes to slope stability prediction. The results manifested that the ensemble learning model outperformed the classical single predictive models, with the CatBoost model yielding the most favourable results. To dive deeper into the credibility and explainability of CatBoost composed of multiple learners, the compound XAI fitted to CatBoost was formulated using feature importance, sensitivity analysis, and Shapley additive explanation (SHAP), which further strengthened the credibility of ensemble learning in geotechnical stability analysis.</p><h3>Graphical abstract</h3>\\n<div><figure><div><div><picture><source><img></source></picture></div></div></figure></div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":593,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Mechanics and Materials in Design\",\"volume\":\"20 2\",\"pages\":\"331 - 352\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Mechanics and Materials in Design\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"88\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10999-023-09679-0\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"材料科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Mechanics and Materials in Design","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10999-023-09679-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们研究了集合学习方法在岩土稳定性分析中的应用,并提出了适合集合学习的复合可解释人工智能(XAI)。我们从现实世界的岩土工程记录中收集了 742 组数据,并选择了有助于稳定性分析的六个关键特征。首先,我们将数据结构可视化,并从统计学和工程学的角度研究了各种特征之间的关系。我们使用真实世界的数据,对七个最先进的集合模型和几个经典的机器学习模型进行了边坡稳定性预测方面的比较和评估。此外,我们还研究了使用堆叠策略的模型融合以及有助于边坡稳定性预测的模型融合性能。结果表明,集合学习模型优于经典的单一预测模型,其中 CatBoost 模型的结果最为理想。为了深入探讨由多个学习者组成的 CatBoost 的可信度和可解释性,利用特征重要性、灵敏度分析和 Shapley 加法解释(SHAP)制定了与 CatBoost 匹配的复合 XAI,进一步加强了集合学习在岩土稳定性分析中的可信度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

A comprehensive evaluation of ensemble machine learning in geotechnical stability analysis and explainability

A comprehensive evaluation of ensemble machine learning in geotechnical stability analysis and explainability

We investigated the application of ensemble learning approaches in geotechnical stability analysis and proposed a compound explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) fitted to ensemble learning. 742 sets of data from real-world geotechnical engineering records are collected and six critical features that contribute to the stability analysis are selected. First, we visualized the data structure and examined the relationships between various features from both a statistical and an engineering standpoint. Seven state-of-the-art ensemble models and several classical machine learning models were compared and evaluated on slope stability prediction using real-world data. Further, we studied model fusion using the stacking strategy and the performance of model fusion that contributes to slope stability prediction. The results manifested that the ensemble learning model outperformed the classical single predictive models, with the CatBoost model yielding the most favourable results. To dive deeper into the credibility and explainability of CatBoost composed of multiple learners, the compound XAI fitted to CatBoost was formulated using feature importance, sensitivity analysis, and Shapley additive explanation (SHAP), which further strengthened the credibility of ensemble learning in geotechnical stability analysis.

Graphical abstract

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Mechanics and Materials in Design
International Journal of Mechanics and Materials in Design ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL-MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
5.40%
发文量
41
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: It is the objective of this journal to provide an effective medium for the dissemination of recent advances and original works in mechanics and materials'' engineering and their impact on the design process in an integrated, highly focused and coherent format. The goal is to enable mechanical, aeronautical, civil, automotive, biomedical, chemical and nuclear engineers, researchers and scientists to keep abreast of recent developments and exchange ideas on a number of topics relating to the use of mechanics and materials in design. Analytical synopsis of contents: The following non-exhaustive list is considered to be within the scope of the International Journal of Mechanics and Materials in Design: Intelligent Design: Nano-engineering and Nano-science in Design; Smart Materials and Adaptive Structures in Design; Mechanism(s) Design; Design against Failure; Design for Manufacturing; Design of Ultralight Structures; Design for a Clean Environment; Impact and Crashworthiness; Microelectronic Packaging Systems. Advanced Materials in Design: Newly Engineered Materials; Smart Materials and Adaptive Structures; Micromechanical Modelling of Composites; Damage Characterisation of Advanced/Traditional Materials; Alternative Use of Traditional Materials in Design; Functionally Graded Materials; Failure Analysis: Fatigue and Fracture; Multiscale Modelling Concepts and Methodology; Interfaces, interfacial properties and characterisation. Design Analysis and Optimisation: Shape and Topology Optimisation; Structural Optimisation; Optimisation Algorithms in Design; Nonlinear Mechanics in Design; Novel Numerical Tools in Design; Geometric Modelling and CAD Tools in Design; FEM, BEM and Hybrid Methods; Integrated Computer Aided Design; Computational Failure Analysis; Coupled Thermo-Electro-Mechanical Designs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信