自古以来的尊严交流:从普塔霍特普到当代伦理与国际法

Q1 Social Sciences
Anthony Löwstedt, Altijana Kapidžić
{"title":"自古以来的尊严交流:从普塔霍特普到当代伦理与国际法","authors":"Anthony Löwstedt, Altijana Kapidžić","doi":"10.1080/17475759.2023.2264851","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AbstractRoots of current conceptions of dignity are identified in Egypt, before the ancient Greek, Roman, Jewish, and Christian sources usually treated as the earliest notions. They refer to dignity in interactionist terms as freedom of speech and in gender as well as socio-economic class relations. They also treat as duties, virtues, and ideals the opposites of humiliation, defamation, censorship, deception, incitement, hate speech, injustice, greed, lack of connectivity, and invasion of privacy. Transcultural continuity is then demonstrated mainly before or outside of Western culture, which has so far been investigated the most for providing origins of moral and legal dignity.KEYWORDS: Communication ethicsdignitymedia regulationnon-western culturesancient EgyptPtahhotep Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.","PeriodicalId":39189,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intercultural Communication Research","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Communication in Dignity Since Early Antiquity: From Ptahhotep to Current Ethics and International Law\",\"authors\":\"Anthony Löwstedt, Altijana Kapidžić\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17475759.2023.2264851\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"AbstractRoots of current conceptions of dignity are identified in Egypt, before the ancient Greek, Roman, Jewish, and Christian sources usually treated as the earliest notions. They refer to dignity in interactionist terms as freedom of speech and in gender as well as socio-economic class relations. They also treat as duties, virtues, and ideals the opposites of humiliation, defamation, censorship, deception, incitement, hate speech, injustice, greed, lack of connectivity, and invasion of privacy. Transcultural continuity is then demonstrated mainly before or outside of Western culture, which has so far been investigated the most for providing origins of moral and legal dignity.KEYWORDS: Communication ethicsdignitymedia regulationnon-western culturesancient EgyptPtahhotep Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39189,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Intercultural Communication Research\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Intercultural Communication Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17475759.2023.2264851\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Intercultural Communication Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17475759.2023.2264851","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

现代尊严概念的根源可以追溯到埃及,在古希腊、罗马、犹太和基督教的来源之前,这些来源通常被视为最早的概念。他们用互动主义的术语来指尊严,如言论自由、性别以及社会经济阶级关系。他们还把羞辱、诽谤、审查、欺骗、煽动、仇恨言论、不公正、贪婪、缺乏联系和侵犯隐私的对立面视为责任、美德和理想。然后,跨文化连续性主要在西方文化之前或之外得到证明,迄今为止,西方文化在提供道德和法律尊严的起源方面被研究得最多。关键词:传播伦理、人格尊严、媒体监管、非西方文化、古埃及、塔霍特普披露声明作者未发现潜在利益冲突。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Communication in Dignity Since Early Antiquity: From Ptahhotep to Current Ethics and International Law
AbstractRoots of current conceptions of dignity are identified in Egypt, before the ancient Greek, Roman, Jewish, and Christian sources usually treated as the earliest notions. They refer to dignity in interactionist terms as freedom of speech and in gender as well as socio-economic class relations. They also treat as duties, virtues, and ideals the opposites of humiliation, defamation, censorship, deception, incitement, hate speech, injustice, greed, lack of connectivity, and invasion of privacy. Transcultural continuity is then demonstrated mainly before or outside of Western culture, which has so far been investigated the most for providing origins of moral and legal dignity.KEYWORDS: Communication ethicsdignitymedia regulationnon-western culturesancient EgyptPtahhotep Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Intercultural Communication Research
Journal of Intercultural Communication Research Social Sciences-Cultural Studies
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信