国家重新参与公立高等教育的概念

IF 1.6 3区教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH

Educational Policy Pub Date : 2023-09-12 DOI:10.1177/08959048231198815

Barrett J. Taylor, Brendan Cantwell

{"title":"国家重新参与公立高等教育的概念","authors":"Barrett J. Taylor, Brendan Cantwell","doi":"10.1177/08959048231198815","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Three trends have characterized state policymaking for higher education in the 21st century: divestment, accountability, and race neutrality. These policy agendas are often justified as an attempt to optimize system efficiency and performance by making institutional actors (agents) responsive to the demands of state officials (principals). In this manuscript, we present quantitative evidence that these three policy initiatives have not achieved their stated purpose. We use contemporary social theory to explain why this is the case. Finally, we call for deeper re-engagement of states and their higher education systems in place of transactional and technocratic models.","PeriodicalId":47728,"journal":{"name":"Educational Policy","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Conceptualizing State Re-Engagement With Public Higher Education\",\"authors\":\"Barrett J. Taylor, Brendan Cantwell\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/08959048231198815\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Three trends have characterized state policymaking for higher education in the 21st century: divestment, accountability, and race neutrality. These policy agendas are often justified as an attempt to optimize system efficiency and performance by making institutional actors (agents) responsive to the demands of state officials (principals). In this manuscript, we present quantitative evidence that these three policy initiatives have not achieved their stated purpose. We use contemporary social theory to explain why this is the case. Finally, we call for deeper re-engagement of states and their higher education systems in place of transactional and technocratic models.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47728,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Educational Policy\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Educational Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/08959048231198815\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educational Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08959048231198815","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

21世纪各州高等教育政策制定的三大趋势是:撤资、问责制和种族中立。这些政策议程通常被认为是通过使机构参与者(代理人)响应国家官员(负责人)的要求来优化系统效率和性能的一种尝试。在本文中，我们提出了量化证据，表明这三项政策举措没有达到其既定目的。我们用当代社会理论来解释为什么会出现这种情况。最后，我们呼吁各国及其高等教育体系更深入地重新参与，以取代交易和技术官僚模式。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Conceptualizing State Re-Engagement With Public Higher Education

Three trends have characterized state policymaking for higher education in the 21st century: divestment, accountability, and race neutrality. These policy agendas are often justified as an attempt to optimize system efficiency and performance by making institutional actors (agents) responsive to the demands of state officials (principals). In this manuscript, we present quantitative evidence that these three policy initiatives have not achieved their stated purpose. We use contemporary social theory to explain why this is the case. Finally, we call for deeper re-engagement of states and their higher education systems in place of transactional and technocratic models.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Educational Policy EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-

CiteScore

4.50

自引率

11.10%

发文量

期刊介绍： Educational Policy provides an interdisciplinary forum for improving education in primary and secondary schools, as well as in high education and non school settings. Educational Policy blends the best of educational research with the world of practice, making it valuable resource for educators, policy makers, administrators, researchers, teachers, and graduate students. Educational Policy is concerned with the practical consequences of policy decisions and alternatives. It examines the relationship between educational policy and educational practice, and sheds new light on important debates and controversies within the field. You"ll find that Educational Policy is an insightful compilation of ideas, strategies, and analyses for improving our educational systems.