单个外科医生保留retzius机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术的学习曲线分析

IF 0.2 Q4 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Hany Hussein, Neil Maitra, Li June Tay, Ioannis Saxionis, Robert Makin, Sailantra Sivathasan, Sonny Smart, Anne Warren, Nimish Shah, Benjamin Wilfrid Lamb
{"title":"单个外科医生保留retzius机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术的学习曲线分析","authors":"Hany Hussein, Neil Maitra, Li June Tay, Ioannis Saxionis, Robert Makin, Sailantra Sivathasan, Sonny Smart, Anne Warren, Nimish Shah, Benjamin Wilfrid Lamb","doi":"10.1177/20514158231203766","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The learning curve for Retzius-sparing robotic radical prostatectomy is not fully understood. Objective: This study attempts to identify the learning curve across the first 130 cases of a single surgeon. Design, Setting and Participants: All Retzius-sparing robotic radical prostatectomy cases performed by a single surgeon at a high-volume tertiary hospital between April 2019 and July 2022 were included. Outcome Measurements and Statistical Analysis: Outcome measures included positive surgical margin rate, complication rates and unplanned readmission to hospital, postoperative urinary continence, erectile function and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) measurement. Cases were divided chronologically into three groups and differences between groups assessed. Results and Limitation: A total of 130 Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RS-RARP) cases were identified. Differences were found between groups in several areas. Positive surgical margin rate fell between Group 1 (30.2%) and Group 3 (9.1%). Safety, postoperative continence, erectile function and PSA remained stable. Median patient age increased between Group 1 (59 years) and Group 3 (66.5 years) ( p = 0.04). Proportion of patients with stage >T2 increased between Group 1 (27.9%) and Group 2 (41.9%) ( p = 0.036). Median console time increased between Group 1 (120 minutes) and Group 2 (150 minutes) ( p = 0.01). Median gland weight increased between Group 1 (28 g) and Group 3 (35.5 g) ( p < 0.001). Conclusions: The positive surgical margin rate improved over the learning curve, despite the complexity of cases increasing, reflected in older patients, larger prostates and higher stage disease. Safety and functional outcomes are excellent throughout. The learning curve might be facilitated by careful case selection favouring smaller prostates with less advanced disease. Patient Summary: We analysed the learning curve for Retzius-sparing robotic radical prostatectomy. Across the first 130 cases, positive surgical margin rate fell; safety and continence remained excellent. Selection of smaller and less advanced cases may facilitate learning. Level of evidence: III","PeriodicalId":15471,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Urology","volume":"68 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis of the learning curve for Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy for a single surgeon\",\"authors\":\"Hany Hussein, Neil Maitra, Li June Tay, Ioannis Saxionis, Robert Makin, Sailantra Sivathasan, Sonny Smart, Anne Warren, Nimish Shah, Benjamin Wilfrid Lamb\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/20514158231203766\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: The learning curve for Retzius-sparing robotic radical prostatectomy is not fully understood. Objective: This study attempts to identify the learning curve across the first 130 cases of a single surgeon. Design, Setting and Participants: All Retzius-sparing robotic radical prostatectomy cases performed by a single surgeon at a high-volume tertiary hospital between April 2019 and July 2022 were included. Outcome Measurements and Statistical Analysis: Outcome measures included positive surgical margin rate, complication rates and unplanned readmission to hospital, postoperative urinary continence, erectile function and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) measurement. Cases were divided chronologically into three groups and differences between groups assessed. Results and Limitation: A total of 130 Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RS-RARP) cases were identified. Differences were found between groups in several areas. Positive surgical margin rate fell between Group 1 (30.2%) and Group 3 (9.1%). Safety, postoperative continence, erectile function and PSA remained stable. Median patient age increased between Group 1 (59 years) and Group 3 (66.5 years) ( p = 0.04). Proportion of patients with stage >T2 increased between Group 1 (27.9%) and Group 2 (41.9%) ( p = 0.036). Median console time increased between Group 1 (120 minutes) and Group 2 (150 minutes) ( p = 0.01). Median gland weight increased between Group 1 (28 g) and Group 3 (35.5 g) ( p < 0.001). Conclusions: The positive surgical margin rate improved over the learning curve, despite the complexity of cases increasing, reflected in older patients, larger prostates and higher stage disease. Safety and functional outcomes are excellent throughout. The learning curve might be facilitated by careful case selection favouring smaller prostates with less advanced disease. Patient Summary: We analysed the learning curve for Retzius-sparing robotic radical prostatectomy. Across the first 130 cases, positive surgical margin rate fell; safety and continence remained excellent. Selection of smaller and less advanced cases may facilitate learning. Level of evidence: III\",\"PeriodicalId\":15471,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Urology\",\"volume\":\"68 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Urology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/20514158231203766\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Urology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20514158231203766","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:保留retzius的机器人根治性前列腺切除术的学习曲线尚不完全清楚。目的:本研究试图确定前130例外科医生的学习曲线。设计、环境和参与者:纳入2019年4月至2022年7月在一家大容量三级医院由一名外科医生实施的所有保留retzius的机器人根治性前列腺切除术病例。结果测量和统计分析:结果测量包括手术切缘阳性率、并发症发生率和意外再入院率、术后尿失禁、勃起功能和前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)测量。病例按时间顺序分为三组,并评估各组之间的差异。结果与局限性:共发现130例保留retzius的机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术(RS-RARP)病例。在几个方面发现了不同群体之间的差异。手术切缘阳性率在1组(30.2%)和3组(9.1%)之间下降。安全性、术后尿失禁、勃起功能和PSA保持稳定。组1(59岁)和组3(66.5岁)患者中位年龄增加(p = 0.04)。与对照组相比,组1(27.9%)和组2(41.9%)患者的T2期患者比例明显增加(p = 0.036)。组1(120分钟)和组2(150分钟)的中位控制台时间增加(p = 0.01)。第1组(28 g)和第3组(35.5 g)中间腺重量增加(p <0.001)。结论:尽管病例复杂性增加,但随着学习曲线的推移,手术切缘阳性率有所提高,这反映在年龄较大、前列腺较大和疾病分期较高的患者中。安全性和功能性结果非常好。仔细的病例选择有利于较小的前列腺和较不严重的疾病,可能会促进学习曲线。患者总结:我们分析了保留retzius的机器人根治性前列腺切除术的学习曲线。在前130例中,手术切缘阳性率下降;安全性和控制性仍然很好。选择较小和较不先进的病例可以促进学习。证据水平:III
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Analysis of the learning curve for Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy for a single surgeon
Background: The learning curve for Retzius-sparing robotic radical prostatectomy is not fully understood. Objective: This study attempts to identify the learning curve across the first 130 cases of a single surgeon. Design, Setting and Participants: All Retzius-sparing robotic radical prostatectomy cases performed by a single surgeon at a high-volume tertiary hospital between April 2019 and July 2022 were included. Outcome Measurements and Statistical Analysis: Outcome measures included positive surgical margin rate, complication rates and unplanned readmission to hospital, postoperative urinary continence, erectile function and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) measurement. Cases were divided chronologically into three groups and differences between groups assessed. Results and Limitation: A total of 130 Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RS-RARP) cases were identified. Differences were found between groups in several areas. Positive surgical margin rate fell between Group 1 (30.2%) and Group 3 (9.1%). Safety, postoperative continence, erectile function and PSA remained stable. Median patient age increased between Group 1 (59 years) and Group 3 (66.5 years) ( p = 0.04). Proportion of patients with stage >T2 increased between Group 1 (27.9%) and Group 2 (41.9%) ( p = 0.036). Median console time increased between Group 1 (120 minutes) and Group 2 (150 minutes) ( p = 0.01). Median gland weight increased between Group 1 (28 g) and Group 3 (35.5 g) ( p < 0.001). Conclusions: The positive surgical margin rate improved over the learning curve, despite the complexity of cases increasing, reflected in older patients, larger prostates and higher stage disease. Safety and functional outcomes are excellent throughout. The learning curve might be facilitated by careful case selection favouring smaller prostates with less advanced disease. Patient Summary: We analysed the learning curve for Retzius-sparing robotic radical prostatectomy. Across the first 130 cases, positive surgical margin rate fell; safety and continence remained excellent. Selection of smaller and less advanced cases may facilitate learning. Level of evidence: III
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Urology
Journal of Clinical Urology UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信