粘结剂、配合比和制备方法对粉煤灰骨料性能的影响

IF 0.8 Q4 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
Subhakanta Dash, Piyush Gupta, Syed Mohammed Mustakim, Itishree Mohanty
{"title":"粘结剂、配合比和制备方法对粉煤灰骨料性能的影响","authors":"Subhakanta Dash, Piyush Gupta, Syed Mohammed Mustakim, Itishree Mohanty","doi":"10.13167/2023.27.5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, two types of lightweight fly ash (FA) aggregates: cold bonded fly ash (CFA) and sintered fly ash (SFA) aggregates were prepared through the cold bonding and sintering method. During the pelletization process, different ratios of binders to fly ash were used, i.e., 10:90, 15:85, 17:83, and 20:80 with a set amount of water. Cement, metakaolin, sodium silicate, urea-formaldehyde resin, bentonite powder, and phenol-formaldehyde resin were employed as binders. A comparative study on physicochemical, mechanical, phase identification, microstructure, and optical analysis of CFA and SFA was performed. The results showed that CFA (an alkali binder) had a higher water absorption (WA) value of 9,50 % with a crushing strength (CS) value of 6,30 MPa than SFA (sodium silicate binder) with a CS value of 5,80 MPa and a WA value of 10,28 %. Experimental observations also demonstrated that the leaching ability of SFA was considerably lower than that of CFA. Most notably, SFA can be used as a substitute for construction material and structural applications along with solving FA waste disposal and related problems to a considerable extent.","PeriodicalId":29665,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Civil and Architectural Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"INFLUENCE OF BINDERS, MIX PROPORTIONS, AND FABRICATION METHOD ON THE CHARACTERISTICS OF FLY ASH AGGREGATE\",\"authors\":\"Subhakanta Dash, Piyush Gupta, Syed Mohammed Mustakim, Itishree Mohanty\",\"doi\":\"10.13167/2023.27.5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper, two types of lightweight fly ash (FA) aggregates: cold bonded fly ash (CFA) and sintered fly ash (SFA) aggregates were prepared through the cold bonding and sintering method. During the pelletization process, different ratios of binders to fly ash were used, i.e., 10:90, 15:85, 17:83, and 20:80 with a set amount of water. Cement, metakaolin, sodium silicate, urea-formaldehyde resin, bentonite powder, and phenol-formaldehyde resin were employed as binders. A comparative study on physicochemical, mechanical, phase identification, microstructure, and optical analysis of CFA and SFA was performed. The results showed that CFA (an alkali binder) had a higher water absorption (WA) value of 9,50 % with a crushing strength (CS) value of 6,30 MPa than SFA (sodium silicate binder) with a CS value of 5,80 MPa and a WA value of 10,28 %. Experimental observations also demonstrated that the leaching ability of SFA was considerably lower than that of CFA. Most notably, SFA can be used as a substitute for construction material and structural applications along with solving FA waste disposal and related problems to a considerable extent.\",\"PeriodicalId\":29665,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in Civil and Architectural Engineering\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in Civil and Architectural Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.13167/2023.27.5\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CIVIL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Civil and Architectural Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13167/2023.27.5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文采用冷粘接烧结法制备了两种轻质粉煤灰(FA)骨料:冷粘接粉煤灰(CFA)和烧结粉煤灰(SFA)骨料。在成球过程中,采用不同的粘结剂与粉煤灰的比例,即10:90、15:85、17:83和20:80,并添加一定量的水。以水泥、偏高岭土、水玻璃、脲醛树脂、膨润土粉、酚醛树脂为粘结剂。对CFA和SFA的理化、力学、物相鉴定、微观结构和光学分析进行了比较研究。结果表明,碱粘结剂CFA的吸水率为9.50%,破碎强度为6.30 MPa,而水玻璃粘结剂SFA的吸水率为5.80 MPa,破碎强度为10.28%。实验观察还表明,SFA的浸出能力明显低于CFA。最值得注意的是,SFA可以作为建筑材料和结构应用的替代品,并在很大程度上解决FA废物处理和相关问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
INFLUENCE OF BINDERS, MIX PROPORTIONS, AND FABRICATION METHOD ON THE CHARACTERISTICS OF FLY ASH AGGREGATE
In this paper, two types of lightweight fly ash (FA) aggregates: cold bonded fly ash (CFA) and sintered fly ash (SFA) aggregates were prepared through the cold bonding and sintering method. During the pelletization process, different ratios of binders to fly ash were used, i.e., 10:90, 15:85, 17:83, and 20:80 with a set amount of water. Cement, metakaolin, sodium silicate, urea-formaldehyde resin, bentonite powder, and phenol-formaldehyde resin were employed as binders. A comparative study on physicochemical, mechanical, phase identification, microstructure, and optical analysis of CFA and SFA was performed. The results showed that CFA (an alkali binder) had a higher water absorption (WA) value of 9,50 % with a crushing strength (CS) value of 6,30 MPa than SFA (sodium silicate binder) with a CS value of 5,80 MPa and a WA value of 10,28 %. Experimental observations also demonstrated that the leaching ability of SFA was considerably lower than that of CFA. Most notably, SFA can be used as a substitute for construction material and structural applications along with solving FA waste disposal and related problems to a considerable extent.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信