基于新场地响应参数TVH的地震动预测方程垂直分量场地响应模型

IF 2.6 3区 地球科学 Q2 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS
Shihong Bai, John X. Zhao
{"title":"基于新场地响应参数TVH的地震动预测方程垂直分量场地响应模型","authors":"Shihong Bai, John X. Zhao","doi":"10.1785/0120220103","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This study presents an alternate site-response model to the existing ground-motion prediction equation (GMPE) from our previous study with some calibration to the magnitude term. We used a new site-response proxy TVH=4×max(30,HB)/VS30 that combines VS30 (the travel-time-averaged shear-wave velocity to 30 m depth) with the engineering bedrock depth HB. VS30 is available for many strong-motion recording stations. However, GMPEs using VS30 do not directly account for the response of the soil layers between 30 m and bedrock depth. Site period TS (four times the shear-wave travel time to the engineering bedrock depth) has also been used in recent GMPEs, with TS being considered a theoretically better parameter than a pseudosite period TVS30 (four times the shear-wave travel time to a depth of 30 m). Obtaining the shear-wave velocity profiles between 30 m and HB for a deep soil site can be expensive, whereas obtaining bedrock depth based on the geotechnical description of borehole data may be relatively easy. We used velocity profiles from the Kyoshin net and Kiban–Kyoshin net strong-motion networks and found that a pseudosite period TVH and TS have an excellent correlation with a small standard deviation at all spectral periods, suggesting that TVH is a suitable site-effect parameter. The poor correlations between TVS30 and TS and between TVS30 and TVH for sites with TS>0.4 s led to poor model performance at long spectral periods. We modified a GMPE by replacing TVS30 with TVH, and we made a minor modification to the moment magnitude term of the GMPE that was necessary for the new site term. The response spectra predicted by models using TVH, TS, and TVS30 at short spectral periods up to 0.6 s are generally similar. At long spectral periods, the spectra predicted by the TVS30 are much smaller than those from the other two GMPEs. For all spectral periods, TVH is an excellent substitute for TVS30.","PeriodicalId":9444,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America","volume":"39 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Site-Response Model for the Vertical Component of Ground-Motion Prediction Equation Using a New Site-Response Parameter TVH\",\"authors\":\"Shihong Bai, John X. Zhao\",\"doi\":\"10.1785/0120220103\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This study presents an alternate site-response model to the existing ground-motion prediction equation (GMPE) from our previous study with some calibration to the magnitude term. We used a new site-response proxy TVH=4×max(30,HB)/VS30 that combines VS30 (the travel-time-averaged shear-wave velocity to 30 m depth) with the engineering bedrock depth HB. VS30 is available for many strong-motion recording stations. However, GMPEs using VS30 do not directly account for the response of the soil layers between 30 m and bedrock depth. Site period TS (four times the shear-wave travel time to the engineering bedrock depth) has also been used in recent GMPEs, with TS being considered a theoretically better parameter than a pseudosite period TVS30 (four times the shear-wave travel time to a depth of 30 m). Obtaining the shear-wave velocity profiles between 30 m and HB for a deep soil site can be expensive, whereas obtaining bedrock depth based on the geotechnical description of borehole data may be relatively easy. We used velocity profiles from the Kyoshin net and Kiban–Kyoshin net strong-motion networks and found that a pseudosite period TVH and TS have an excellent correlation with a small standard deviation at all spectral periods, suggesting that TVH is a suitable site-effect parameter. The poor correlations between TVS30 and TS and between TVS30 and TVH for sites with TS>0.4 s led to poor model performance at long spectral periods. We modified a GMPE by replacing TVS30 with TVH, and we made a minor modification to the moment magnitude term of the GMPE that was necessary for the new site term. The response spectra predicted by models using TVH, TS, and TVS30 at short spectral periods up to 0.6 s are generally similar. At long spectral periods, the spectra predicted by the TVS30 are much smaller than those from the other two GMPEs. For all spectral periods, TVH is an excellent substitute for TVS30.\",\"PeriodicalId\":9444,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America\",\"volume\":\"39 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1785/0120220103\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1785/0120220103","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究提出了一种替代现有地震动预测方程(GMPE)的场地响应模型,并对震级项进行了一些校准。我们使用了一个新的现场响应代理TVH=4×max(30,HB)/VS30,该代理将VS30 (30 m深度的走时平均横波速度)与工程基岩深度HB结合起来。VS30可用于许多强震记录站。然而,使用VS30的GMPEs不能直接解释30 m至基岩深度之间土层的响应。在最近的GMPEs中也使用了现场周期TS(4倍于工程基岩深度的剪切波传播时间),从理论上讲,TS被认为是比伪现场周期TVS30(4倍于30米深度的剪切波传播时间)更好的参数。对于深层土壤场地,获得30米至HB之间的剪切波速度剖面可能是昂贵的,而基于钻孔数据的岩土技术描述获得基岩深度可能相对容易。我们利用京心网和kiban -京心网强震网的速度剖面,发现伪场点周期TVH和TS在所有谱周期都有很好的相关性,标准差很小,表明TVH是一个合适的场点效应参数。对于TS>0.4 s的站点,TVS30与TS之间以及TVS30与TVH之间的相关性较差,导致模型在长光谱周期下的性能较差。我们通过将TVS30替换为TVH来修改GMPE,并对GMPE的矩量项进行了微小的修改,这是新站点项所必需的。利用TVH、TS和TVS30模型预测的短谱周期(0.6 s)响应谱大致相似。在较长的光谱周期内,TVS30预测的光谱比其他两个GMPEs预测的要小得多。在所有频谱周期内,TVH都是TVS30的极好替代品。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Site-Response Model for the Vertical Component of Ground-Motion Prediction Equation Using a New Site-Response Parameter TVH
ABSTRACT This study presents an alternate site-response model to the existing ground-motion prediction equation (GMPE) from our previous study with some calibration to the magnitude term. We used a new site-response proxy TVH=4×max(30,HB)/VS30 that combines VS30 (the travel-time-averaged shear-wave velocity to 30 m depth) with the engineering bedrock depth HB. VS30 is available for many strong-motion recording stations. However, GMPEs using VS30 do not directly account for the response of the soil layers between 30 m and bedrock depth. Site period TS (four times the shear-wave travel time to the engineering bedrock depth) has also been used in recent GMPEs, with TS being considered a theoretically better parameter than a pseudosite period TVS30 (four times the shear-wave travel time to a depth of 30 m). Obtaining the shear-wave velocity profiles between 30 m and HB for a deep soil site can be expensive, whereas obtaining bedrock depth based on the geotechnical description of borehole data may be relatively easy. We used velocity profiles from the Kyoshin net and Kiban–Kyoshin net strong-motion networks and found that a pseudosite period TVH and TS have an excellent correlation with a small standard deviation at all spectral periods, suggesting that TVH is a suitable site-effect parameter. The poor correlations between TVS30 and TS and between TVS30 and TVH for sites with TS>0.4 s led to poor model performance at long spectral periods. We modified a GMPE by replacing TVS30 with TVH, and we made a minor modification to the moment magnitude term of the GMPE that was necessary for the new site term. The response spectra predicted by models using TVH, TS, and TVS30 at short spectral periods up to 0.6 s are generally similar. At long spectral periods, the spectra predicted by the TVS30 are much smaller than those from the other two GMPEs. For all spectral periods, TVH is an excellent substitute for TVS30.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 地学-地球化学与地球物理
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
13.30%
发文量
140
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, commonly referred to as BSSA, (ISSN 0037-1106) is the premier journal of advanced research in earthquake seismology and related disciplines. It first appeared in 1911 and became a bimonthly in 1963. Each issue is composed of scientific papers on the various aspects of seismology, including investigation of specific earthquakes, theoretical and observational studies of seismic waves, inverse methods for determining the structure of the Earth or the dynamics of the earthquake source, seismometry, earthquake hazard and risk estimation, seismotectonics, and earthquake engineering. Special issues focus on important earthquakes or rapidly changing topics in seismology. BSSA is published by the Seismological Society of America.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信