{"title":"旁遮普省2019冠状病毒病公众病耻感的探索性横断面研究","authors":"Neha Gill, Jasmin Garg, Rohit Garg","doi":"10.4103/ijsp.ijsp_274_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Background: Stigma perceived by persons affected with Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and their family members has been reported in the literature. This study aimed to evaluate COVID-19-related public stigma in detail in a regional area of Punjab, North India. Materials and Methods: It was a cross-sectional, hospital-based, descriptive study. Four hundred and eighty-eight participants were recruited and administered Explanatory Model Interview Catalogue-Stigma Scale to measure public stigma against COVID-19. The data were analyzed using Mann–Whitney test and Spearman correlation coefficient. Results: >78.68% participants believed that people in their community avoided a person affected by COVID-19, 76.6% believed that COVID-19 caused problems for family. More than 70% participants responded that people refused to visit the home of an affected person and it created difficulties for an affected person to find work. Nearly 70% responded that people dislike buying food from an affected person. 60% participants responded that sufferers would have concerns related to disclosure of illness. On the positive side, majority participants responded that COVID-19 would not lead to difficulties in finding match for the sufferer’s marriage (57.8%) or relative’s marriage (80.3%) or would not lead to problems in ongoing marriage (61.7%). Nearly 60% also responded that people would not think less of themselves if a family member had COVID-19 and it would not cause shame and embarrassment in community (58.8%). Conclusion: Public stigma for COVID-19 was high in some forms (avoidance, disclosure concerns, difficulty in finding work, etc.) and low in some other forms (like marriage-related issues, shame, and embarrassment in community).","PeriodicalId":55693,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Social Psychiatry","volume":"21 2","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Exploratory Cross-sectional Study on Public Stigma against Coronavirus Disease 2019 from Punjab\",\"authors\":\"Neha Gill, Jasmin Garg, Rohit Garg\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/ijsp.ijsp_274_22\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Background: Stigma perceived by persons affected with Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and their family members has been reported in the literature. This study aimed to evaluate COVID-19-related public stigma in detail in a regional area of Punjab, North India. Materials and Methods: It was a cross-sectional, hospital-based, descriptive study. Four hundred and eighty-eight participants were recruited and administered Explanatory Model Interview Catalogue-Stigma Scale to measure public stigma against COVID-19. The data were analyzed using Mann–Whitney test and Spearman correlation coefficient. Results: >78.68% participants believed that people in their community avoided a person affected by COVID-19, 76.6% believed that COVID-19 caused problems for family. More than 70% participants responded that people refused to visit the home of an affected person and it created difficulties for an affected person to find work. Nearly 70% responded that people dislike buying food from an affected person. 60% participants responded that sufferers would have concerns related to disclosure of illness. On the positive side, majority participants responded that COVID-19 would not lead to difficulties in finding match for the sufferer’s marriage (57.8%) or relative’s marriage (80.3%) or would not lead to problems in ongoing marriage (61.7%). Nearly 60% also responded that people would not think less of themselves if a family member had COVID-19 and it would not cause shame and embarrassment in community (58.8%). Conclusion: Public stigma for COVID-19 was high in some forms (avoidance, disclosure concerns, difficulty in finding work, etc.) and low in some other forms (like marriage-related issues, shame, and embarrassment in community).\",\"PeriodicalId\":55693,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indian Journal of Social Psychiatry\",\"volume\":\"21 2\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indian Journal of Social Psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijsp.ijsp_274_22\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Social Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijsp.ijsp_274_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
An Exploratory Cross-sectional Study on Public Stigma against Coronavirus Disease 2019 from Punjab
Abstract Background: Stigma perceived by persons affected with Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and their family members has been reported in the literature. This study aimed to evaluate COVID-19-related public stigma in detail in a regional area of Punjab, North India. Materials and Methods: It was a cross-sectional, hospital-based, descriptive study. Four hundred and eighty-eight participants were recruited and administered Explanatory Model Interview Catalogue-Stigma Scale to measure public stigma against COVID-19. The data were analyzed using Mann–Whitney test and Spearman correlation coefficient. Results: >78.68% participants believed that people in their community avoided a person affected by COVID-19, 76.6% believed that COVID-19 caused problems for family. More than 70% participants responded that people refused to visit the home of an affected person and it created difficulties for an affected person to find work. Nearly 70% responded that people dislike buying food from an affected person. 60% participants responded that sufferers would have concerns related to disclosure of illness. On the positive side, majority participants responded that COVID-19 would not lead to difficulties in finding match for the sufferer’s marriage (57.8%) or relative’s marriage (80.3%) or would not lead to problems in ongoing marriage (61.7%). Nearly 60% also responded that people would not think less of themselves if a family member had COVID-19 and it would not cause shame and embarrassment in community (58.8%). Conclusion: Public stigma for COVID-19 was high in some forms (avoidance, disclosure concerns, difficulty in finding work, etc.) and low in some other forms (like marriage-related issues, shame, and embarrassment in community).