{"title":"慰安妇的幽灵:生物政治殖民战争,人性问题,和闹鬼的未来","authors":"Jungah Kim-Kiteishvili","doi":"10.1177/26330024231213102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The memories of “comfort women” have been discursively represented primarily within the dynamic discussions that define narratives regarding the universal human rights of women. In this article, I attempt to re-read the history of the comfort women system against the paradigmatic human rights narratives of gender-based violence while contextualizing its history within the legacy of colonial racism. The understanding of the comfort women system as colonial violence that I put forward thus challenges the basic assumptions of current debates on contested memories in East Asia. For this, I draw on haunting aspects of Zainichi Korean documentary filmmaker Soonam Park’s archivization of human suffering during the colonial period and on Michel Foucault’s notion of biopolitics. I further discuss the contrasting implications of W. E. B. Du Bois’s visits to Japan and to the ruins of the Warsaw Ghetto in light of Michael Rothberg’s reading of Du Bois and of his conceptual reflections on “marking caesuras.” In this regard, I characterize Imperial Japan as the absent empire of postcolonial grammatology, underscoring thereby the manner in which Eurocentrism, binary thinking, and habitual orientation around the color line inhabit and determine much of the work carried out under the banner of postcolonial studies. “Enter the ghost, exit the ghost, re-enter the ghost.” – Hamlet.","PeriodicalId":192856,"journal":{"name":"Violence: An International Journal","volume":"8 6","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Specters of comfort women: Biopolitical colonial warfare, questions of humanity, and the haunted future\",\"authors\":\"Jungah Kim-Kiteishvili\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/26330024231213102\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The memories of “comfort women” have been discursively represented primarily within the dynamic discussions that define narratives regarding the universal human rights of women. In this article, I attempt to re-read the history of the comfort women system against the paradigmatic human rights narratives of gender-based violence while contextualizing its history within the legacy of colonial racism. The understanding of the comfort women system as colonial violence that I put forward thus challenges the basic assumptions of current debates on contested memories in East Asia. For this, I draw on haunting aspects of Zainichi Korean documentary filmmaker Soonam Park’s archivization of human suffering during the colonial period and on Michel Foucault’s notion of biopolitics. I further discuss the contrasting implications of W. E. B. Du Bois’s visits to Japan and to the ruins of the Warsaw Ghetto in light of Michael Rothberg’s reading of Du Bois and of his conceptual reflections on “marking caesuras.” In this regard, I characterize Imperial Japan as the absent empire of postcolonial grammatology, underscoring thereby the manner in which Eurocentrism, binary thinking, and habitual orientation around the color line inhabit and determine much of the work carried out under the banner of postcolonial studies. “Enter the ghost, exit the ghost, re-enter the ghost.” – Hamlet.\",\"PeriodicalId\":192856,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Violence: An International Journal\",\"volume\":\"8 6\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Violence: An International Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/26330024231213102\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Violence: An International Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/26330024231213102","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
“慰安妇”的记忆主要是在动态讨论中被论述出来的,这些讨论定义了关于妇女普遍人权的叙述。在这篇文章中,我试图重新阅读慰安妇制度的历史,反对基于性别的暴力的范式人权叙事,同时将其历史置于殖民种族主义的遗产中。因此,我提出的将慰安妇制度理解为殖民暴力的观点,挑战了目前关于东亚有争议记忆的辩论的基本假设。为此,我借鉴了在日韩国纪录片导演朴顺南(Soonam Park)对殖民时期人类苦难的存档,以及米歇尔·福柯(Michel Foucault)的生命政治概念。根据迈克尔·罗斯伯格(Michael Rothberg)对杜波依斯(w.e.b. Du Bois)的阅读,以及他对“标记停顿”(marking caesuras)的概念性反思,我进一步讨论杜波依斯(w.e.b. Du Bois)访问日本和华沙犹太人区废墟的对比含义。在这方面,我将日本帝国描述为后殖民语法学缺失的帝国,从而强调了欧洲中心主义、二元思维和围绕肤色线的习惯性取向的方式,并决定了在后殖民研究旗帜下开展的大部分工作。"进入鬼魂,离开鬼魂,再进入鬼魂。——哈姆雷特。
Specters of comfort women: Biopolitical colonial warfare, questions of humanity, and the haunted future
The memories of “comfort women” have been discursively represented primarily within the dynamic discussions that define narratives regarding the universal human rights of women. In this article, I attempt to re-read the history of the comfort women system against the paradigmatic human rights narratives of gender-based violence while contextualizing its history within the legacy of colonial racism. The understanding of the comfort women system as colonial violence that I put forward thus challenges the basic assumptions of current debates on contested memories in East Asia. For this, I draw on haunting aspects of Zainichi Korean documentary filmmaker Soonam Park’s archivization of human suffering during the colonial period and on Michel Foucault’s notion of biopolitics. I further discuss the contrasting implications of W. E. B. Du Bois’s visits to Japan and to the ruins of the Warsaw Ghetto in light of Michael Rothberg’s reading of Du Bois and of his conceptual reflections on “marking caesuras.” In this regard, I characterize Imperial Japan as the absent empire of postcolonial grammatology, underscoring thereby the manner in which Eurocentrism, binary thinking, and habitual orientation around the color line inhabit and determine much of the work carried out under the banner of postcolonial studies. “Enter the ghost, exit the ghost, re-enter the ghost.” – Hamlet.