A36支持临床和非临床工作人员与患者、亲属和同事进行具有挑战性的对话:与真人演员进行在线模拟

Anna Thame, Carrie Hamilton
{"title":"A36支持临床和非临床工作人员与患者、亲属和同事进行具有挑战性的对话:与真人演员进行在线模拟","authors":"Anna Thame, Carrie Hamilton","doi":"10.54531/veea2969","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Whether clinical or non-clinical, patient facing or not, staff working in a healthcare environment will need to initiate or manage challenging conversations in the workplace, with colleagues, patients or relatives/carers. How well and how compassionately these more difficult interactions are handled is critical to whether the conversation is effective, and leaves all parties feel respected and heard, even if the issue itself cannot be resolved. If there is negative escalation of the situation, trust is undermined, leading to further complications, distress and potential error. This can have a significant impact on team working, and ultimately on the patient or their relative’s experience [1]. Evidence was gathered from a large NHS Trust during the two-month long design of the workshop. The aim was to enable participants to learn communication strategies and techniques helping them to effectively manage challenging conversations with kindness and compassion. In 2020, five standalone sessions were delivered online (a result of the geographical size of the Trust rather than a result of the pandemic); there has been a further six online deliveries per year to date, with constant review and revision. Content includes: Active listening, empathy, communication strategies, appreciative enquiry, an exploration of values, and opportunities for reflection. The scenarios cover colleague to colleague interactions (Teams meeting), frustrated relatives (phone call), isolated patient (video consultation) and unsafe colleague (face to face). All are effective in an online environment, and are authentic and relatable. Over 300 NHS staff have participated over three years. Evaluation shows they agree or strongly agree that their skills and knowledge has improved, the scenarios were relevant and authentic, and the mode of participation provided a valuable opportunity to practice new skills in a safe environment. All felt more confident to hold challenging conversations that would be more mutually positive and avoid escalation. Consistently, participants have commented on the positivity of receiving feedback from each other and the involvement of actors was found to be highly beneficial, with feedback from them, from their perspective, uniquely insightful. For the last three years, staff from a large NHS Trust have been able to learn and practice challenging conversations, through online, live simulation, with ‘real’ patients, relatives/carers and colleagues. They have explored why conflict occurs and practised strategies, stopping and restarting, rehearsing and debriefing. Participants have requested further sessions and stated they would highly recommend all colleagues to undertake this training. Authors confirm that all relevant ethical standards for research conduct and dissemination have been met. The submitting author confirms that relevant ethical approval was granted, if applicable.","PeriodicalId":93766,"journal":{"name":"International journal of healthcare simulation : advances in theory and practice","volume":"187 ","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A36 Supporting clinical and non-clinical staff to have challenging conversations with patients, relatives and colleagues: online simulation with live actors\",\"authors\":\"Anna Thame, Carrie Hamilton\",\"doi\":\"10.54531/veea2969\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Whether clinical or non-clinical, patient facing or not, staff working in a healthcare environment will need to initiate or manage challenging conversations in the workplace, with colleagues, patients or relatives/carers. How well and how compassionately these more difficult interactions are handled is critical to whether the conversation is effective, and leaves all parties feel respected and heard, even if the issue itself cannot be resolved. If there is negative escalation of the situation, trust is undermined, leading to further complications, distress and potential error. This can have a significant impact on team working, and ultimately on the patient or their relative’s experience [1]. Evidence was gathered from a large NHS Trust during the two-month long design of the workshop. The aim was to enable participants to learn communication strategies and techniques helping them to effectively manage challenging conversations with kindness and compassion. In 2020, five standalone sessions were delivered online (a result of the geographical size of the Trust rather than a result of the pandemic); there has been a further six online deliveries per year to date, with constant review and revision. Content includes: Active listening, empathy, communication strategies, appreciative enquiry, an exploration of values, and opportunities for reflection. The scenarios cover colleague to colleague interactions (Teams meeting), frustrated relatives (phone call), isolated patient (video consultation) and unsafe colleague (face to face). All are effective in an online environment, and are authentic and relatable. Over 300 NHS staff have participated over three years. Evaluation shows they agree or strongly agree that their skills and knowledge has improved, the scenarios were relevant and authentic, and the mode of participation provided a valuable opportunity to practice new skills in a safe environment. All felt more confident to hold challenging conversations that would be more mutually positive and avoid escalation. Consistently, participants have commented on the positivity of receiving feedback from each other and the involvement of actors was found to be highly beneficial, with feedback from them, from their perspective, uniquely insightful. For the last three years, staff from a large NHS Trust have been able to learn and practice challenging conversations, through online, live simulation, with ‘real’ patients, relatives/carers and colleagues. They have explored why conflict occurs and practised strategies, stopping and restarting, rehearsing and debriefing. Participants have requested further sessions and stated they would highly recommend all colleagues to undertake this training. Authors confirm that all relevant ethical standards for research conduct and dissemination have been met. The submitting author confirms that relevant ethical approval was granted, if applicable.\",\"PeriodicalId\":93766,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of healthcare simulation : advances in theory and practice\",\"volume\":\"187 \",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of healthcare simulation : advances in theory and practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.54531/veea2969\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of healthcare simulation : advances in theory and practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54531/veea2969","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

无论是临床还是非临床、是否面对患者,在医疗保健环境中工作的员工都需要在工作场所与同事、患者或亲属/护理人员发起或管理具有挑战性的对话。处理这些更困难的互动的好坏和同情程度,对于对话是否有效至关重要,即使问题本身无法解决,也要让各方都感到受到尊重和倾听。如果局势出现负面升级,信任就会受到破坏,导致进一步的复杂情况、痛苦和潜在的错误。这可能会对团队合作产生重大影响,并最终影响患者或其亲属的体验[1]。在为期两个月的研讨会设计期间,从一家大型NHS信托机构收集了证据。目的是让参与者学习沟通策略和技巧,帮助他们以善意和同情心有效地管理具有挑战性的对话。2020年,在线举办了五次独立会议(这是信托基金地理规模大的结果,而不是大流行的结果);到目前为止,每年还有6次在线交付,并不断进行审查和修订。内容包括:积极倾听、共情、沟通策略、欣赏式询问、价值观探索和反思的机会。这些场景包括同事之间的互动(团队会议)、沮丧的亲属(电话)、孤立的病人(视频咨询)和不安全的同事(面对面)。这些都是有效的在线环境,是真实的和相关的。三年来,300多名NHS工作人员参与了这项活动。评估表明,他们同意或强烈同意他们的技能和知识得到了提高,场景是相关的和真实的,参与模式提供了一个在安全环境中练习新技能的宝贵机会。所有人都感到更有信心进行具有挑战性的对话,这将使双方更加积极,避免升级。参与者一致认为,从彼此那里得到反馈是积极的,参与者的参与被发现是非常有益的,从他们的角度来看,他们的反馈是独特的洞察力。在过去的三年里,一家大型NHS信托基金的员工已经能够通过在线实时模拟,与“真实”的病人、亲属/护理人员和同事学习和练习具有挑战性的对话。他们探讨了冲突发生的原因,并练习了策略,停止和重新开始,排练和汇报。与会者要求举行进一步的培训,并表示他们强烈建议所有同事参加这一培训。作者确认已符合研究行为和传播的所有相关伦理标准。提交作者确认已获得相关的伦理批准(如适用)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A36 Supporting clinical and non-clinical staff to have challenging conversations with patients, relatives and colleagues: online simulation with live actors
Whether clinical or non-clinical, patient facing or not, staff working in a healthcare environment will need to initiate or manage challenging conversations in the workplace, with colleagues, patients or relatives/carers. How well and how compassionately these more difficult interactions are handled is critical to whether the conversation is effective, and leaves all parties feel respected and heard, even if the issue itself cannot be resolved. If there is negative escalation of the situation, trust is undermined, leading to further complications, distress and potential error. This can have a significant impact on team working, and ultimately on the patient or their relative’s experience [1]. Evidence was gathered from a large NHS Trust during the two-month long design of the workshop. The aim was to enable participants to learn communication strategies and techniques helping them to effectively manage challenging conversations with kindness and compassion. In 2020, five standalone sessions were delivered online (a result of the geographical size of the Trust rather than a result of the pandemic); there has been a further six online deliveries per year to date, with constant review and revision. Content includes: Active listening, empathy, communication strategies, appreciative enquiry, an exploration of values, and opportunities for reflection. The scenarios cover colleague to colleague interactions (Teams meeting), frustrated relatives (phone call), isolated patient (video consultation) and unsafe colleague (face to face). All are effective in an online environment, and are authentic and relatable. Over 300 NHS staff have participated over three years. Evaluation shows they agree or strongly agree that their skills and knowledge has improved, the scenarios were relevant and authentic, and the mode of participation provided a valuable opportunity to practice new skills in a safe environment. All felt more confident to hold challenging conversations that would be more mutually positive and avoid escalation. Consistently, participants have commented on the positivity of receiving feedback from each other and the involvement of actors was found to be highly beneficial, with feedback from them, from their perspective, uniquely insightful. For the last three years, staff from a large NHS Trust have been able to learn and practice challenging conversations, through online, live simulation, with ‘real’ patients, relatives/carers and colleagues. They have explored why conflict occurs and practised strategies, stopping and restarting, rehearsing and debriefing. Participants have requested further sessions and stated they would highly recommend all colleagues to undertake this training. Authors confirm that all relevant ethical standards for research conduct and dissemination have been met. The submitting author confirms that relevant ethical approval was granted, if applicable.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信