A110模拟物理治疗实习:一年级物理治疗本科学生临床实习的替代方案

Karen Stevens, Helen Batty, Ross Mallett
{"title":"A110模拟物理治疗实习:一年级物理治疗本科学生临床实习的替代方案","authors":"Karen Stevens, Helen Batty, Ross Mallett","doi":"10.54531/rwgo6841","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To address the existing workforce deficit within Physiotherapy an extra 500 Physiotherapists need to be trained every year - an additional 15% of current student numbers. The biggest barrier to expansion of student numbers is placement capacity. Novel and innovative models of placement are being trialled, with a strong emphasis on the four pillars of clinical practice. Simulation, and virtual based placements offer alternative models of placement provision [1]. Current literature has detailed successful simulated clinical placement within Physiotherapy using full or partial substitution of clinical placement. It has been shown that switching up to 25% of practice learning to a simulated model does not compromise student attainment or competency [2]. However, these studies tend to involve small student numbers. For simulated placements to be a practical alternative they need to be delivered at scale. The aim of this pilot project was to develop, deliver and evaluate an on campus simulated placement experience for 140 first year Physiotherapy students at a large UK university. A four-week program of activities was designed to simulate the core learning that occurs on a typical physiotherapy clinical placement. Including case scenarios with standardized patients, virtual case discussions with clinicians, expert patient panel, day in the life of videos, note writing workshops and live streaming of patient sessions. Students attended two observational days in practice with structured debriefing on campus. Themes for the placement included communication, risk assessment, patient journeys, wellness and effective learning on placement. The development of the learning activities was research and stakeholder informed. Clinical scenarios were co-designed with level 5 Physiotherapy students. Placement evaluation was collected via a questionnaire including open ended questions and Likert scales (0-5). Students agreed that that placement was engaging and interesting (mean score of 3.45), with the greatest agreement that the placement had improved note writing, communication and understanding of professionalism. Students ranked simulated clinical scenarios and observation as their preference for activity, with peer learning to support these activities to be ranked the lowest. A review of placement attainment data noted a correlation with previous clinical placement data. There was an increase in a student’s perception of their preparedness to go on a clinical placement pre and post simulated placement. Large scale, simulated on campus placements are workable and a useful learning experience for first year Physiotherapy students. Authors confirm that all relevant ethical standards for research conduct and dissemination have been met. The submitting author confirms that relevant ethical approval was granted, if applicable.","PeriodicalId":93766,"journal":{"name":"International journal of healthcare simulation : advances in theory and practice","volume":"59 16","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A110 Simulated Physiotherapy Placement: An alternative to clinical placement for first year undergraduate Physiotherapy students\",\"authors\":\"Karen Stevens, Helen Batty, Ross Mallett\",\"doi\":\"10.54531/rwgo6841\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"To address the existing workforce deficit within Physiotherapy an extra 500 Physiotherapists need to be trained every year - an additional 15% of current student numbers. The biggest barrier to expansion of student numbers is placement capacity. Novel and innovative models of placement are being trialled, with a strong emphasis on the four pillars of clinical practice. Simulation, and virtual based placements offer alternative models of placement provision [1]. Current literature has detailed successful simulated clinical placement within Physiotherapy using full or partial substitution of clinical placement. It has been shown that switching up to 25% of practice learning to a simulated model does not compromise student attainment or competency [2]. However, these studies tend to involve small student numbers. For simulated placements to be a practical alternative they need to be delivered at scale. The aim of this pilot project was to develop, deliver and evaluate an on campus simulated placement experience for 140 first year Physiotherapy students at a large UK university. A four-week program of activities was designed to simulate the core learning that occurs on a typical physiotherapy clinical placement. Including case scenarios with standardized patients, virtual case discussions with clinicians, expert patient panel, day in the life of videos, note writing workshops and live streaming of patient sessions. Students attended two observational days in practice with structured debriefing on campus. Themes for the placement included communication, risk assessment, patient journeys, wellness and effective learning on placement. The development of the learning activities was research and stakeholder informed. Clinical scenarios were co-designed with level 5 Physiotherapy students. Placement evaluation was collected via a questionnaire including open ended questions and Likert scales (0-5). Students agreed that that placement was engaging and interesting (mean score of 3.45), with the greatest agreement that the placement had improved note writing, communication and understanding of professionalism. Students ranked simulated clinical scenarios and observation as their preference for activity, with peer learning to support these activities to be ranked the lowest. A review of placement attainment data noted a correlation with previous clinical placement data. There was an increase in a student’s perception of their preparedness to go on a clinical placement pre and post simulated placement. Large scale, simulated on campus placements are workable and a useful learning experience for first year Physiotherapy students. Authors confirm that all relevant ethical standards for research conduct and dissemination have been met. The submitting author confirms that relevant ethical approval was granted, if applicable.\",\"PeriodicalId\":93766,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of healthcare simulation : advances in theory and practice\",\"volume\":\"59 16\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of healthcare simulation : advances in theory and practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.54531/rwgo6841\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of healthcare simulation : advances in theory and practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54531/rwgo6841","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为了解决物理治疗专业现有的劳动力短缺问题,每年需要额外培训500名物理治疗师——相当于目前学生人数的15%。扩大学生人数的最大障碍是安置能力。正在试验新颖和创新的安置模式,重点强调临床实践的四大支柱。模拟和基于虚拟的安置提供了安置提供的替代模型[1]。目前的文献详细描述了物理治疗中成功的模拟临床安置,使用完全或部分替代临床安置。研究表明,将高达25%的实践学习转换为模拟模型并不会影响学生的成绩或能力[2]。然而,这些研究往往涉及的学生人数较少。为了使模拟安置成为一种实际的替代方案,它们需要大规模交付。该试点项目的目的是为英国一所大型大学的140名一年级物理治疗专业的学生开发、交付和评估校园模拟实习体验。一个为期四周的活动项目旨在模拟典型物理治疗临床实习的核心学习。包括标准化患者的病例场景、与临床医生的虚拟病例讨论、专家患者小组、日常视频、笔记写作研讨会和患者会议的直播。学生们在校园里参加了为期两天的有组织的汇报实践。实习的主题包括沟通、风险评估、病人旅程、健康和实习期间的有效学习。学习活动的发展是研究和利益相关者知情的。临床场景与5级物理治疗学生共同设计。安置评估通过问卷收集,包括开放式问题和李克特量表(0-5)。学生们一致认为这个实习很吸引人,也很有趣(平均得分3.45),最一致的观点是实习提高了笔记写作、沟通和对专业的理解。学生们将模拟临床情景和观察列为他们最喜欢的活动,而支持这些活动的同伴学习排名最低。对安置成就数据的回顾注意到与先前临床安置数据的相关性。在模拟实习前后,学生对临床实习的准备程度有所提高。大规模的模拟校园实习是可行的,对物理治疗专业的一年级学生来说是一个有用的学习经验。作者确认已符合研究行为和传播的所有相关伦理标准。提交作者确认已获得相关的伦理批准(如适用)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A110 Simulated Physiotherapy Placement: An alternative to clinical placement for first year undergraduate Physiotherapy students
To address the existing workforce deficit within Physiotherapy an extra 500 Physiotherapists need to be trained every year - an additional 15% of current student numbers. The biggest barrier to expansion of student numbers is placement capacity. Novel and innovative models of placement are being trialled, with a strong emphasis on the four pillars of clinical practice. Simulation, and virtual based placements offer alternative models of placement provision [1]. Current literature has detailed successful simulated clinical placement within Physiotherapy using full or partial substitution of clinical placement. It has been shown that switching up to 25% of practice learning to a simulated model does not compromise student attainment or competency [2]. However, these studies tend to involve small student numbers. For simulated placements to be a practical alternative they need to be delivered at scale. The aim of this pilot project was to develop, deliver and evaluate an on campus simulated placement experience for 140 first year Physiotherapy students at a large UK university. A four-week program of activities was designed to simulate the core learning that occurs on a typical physiotherapy clinical placement. Including case scenarios with standardized patients, virtual case discussions with clinicians, expert patient panel, day in the life of videos, note writing workshops and live streaming of patient sessions. Students attended two observational days in practice with structured debriefing on campus. Themes for the placement included communication, risk assessment, patient journeys, wellness and effective learning on placement. The development of the learning activities was research and stakeholder informed. Clinical scenarios were co-designed with level 5 Physiotherapy students. Placement evaluation was collected via a questionnaire including open ended questions and Likert scales (0-5). Students agreed that that placement was engaging and interesting (mean score of 3.45), with the greatest agreement that the placement had improved note writing, communication and understanding of professionalism. Students ranked simulated clinical scenarios and observation as their preference for activity, with peer learning to support these activities to be ranked the lowest. A review of placement attainment data noted a correlation with previous clinical placement data. There was an increase in a student’s perception of their preparedness to go on a clinical placement pre and post simulated placement. Large scale, simulated on campus placements are workable and a useful learning experience for first year Physiotherapy students. Authors confirm that all relevant ethical standards for research conduct and dissemination have been met. The submitting author confirms that relevant ethical approval was granted, if applicable.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信