扩展学生就业援助的未来:它是模拟的吗?它是可持续的吗?

Shona Hill, Ben Hester, Ashley Duzy, Lenny Kistler, Racheal Bolton
{"title":"扩展学生就业援助的未来:它是模拟的吗?它是可持续的吗?","authors":"Shona Hill, Ben Hester, Ashley Duzy, Lenny Kistler, Racheal Bolton","doi":"10.54531/zzal2905","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In recent years many Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) have recognized the benefits of Simulation Based Education (SBE) and incorporated it into their teaching programs, in some cases utilizing it to replace traditional ‘clinical placement’ hours [1]. This has been catalysed by the COVID-19 pandemic whereby there has been unprecedented demands on NHS services, forcing the industry to offer alternative placement models [2]. To contribute to placement expansion by offering a simulation-based student placement. We created a six week non-clinical, simulation placement designed to host two Physiotherapy students. The overarching objective of this placement was to enable students to create and run their own simulation training session by their final week. They were based in the simulation team and networked with other students and clinicians to guide their research and planning. We collated feedback from the students at the end of their six-week placement via anonymous, online Microsoft feedback forms. Throughout 2022 we ran this placement twice and collated data from the 4 Physiotherapy students, all who were in their second year of study. Thematic analysis suggested the most common skills students felt they gained were soft skills (i.e. organization and prioritization) and development of varied communication styles. Additional themes that were mentioned included simulation specific skills. There were two areas where students felt they were unable to develop due to the placement communicating with ‘real’ patients and clinical note writing. Students were asked to score their clinical knowledge relating to their chosen simulation topic area at the beginning and end of the placement. Scores increased from ‘Good’ (2 students) and ‘Average’ (2 students) at the beginning of the placement to ‘Good’ (1 student) and ‘Very Good’ (3 Students) at the end of the placement. Qualitative themes suggested the students felt the overall variety of activities and exposure to clinical scenarios/teams they may not have seen before was unique to this placement and both enjoyable and valuable. Previous studies have identified misconceptions relating to the purpose of simulation and its aims [1]. Our data reflected this concept as students rated their knowledge of simulation at the beginning of the placement as ‘Very Minimal’. However, our placement offering has proven to successfully increase this awareness and offer the opportunity to develop transferable skills and clinical knowledge in a way that is both exciting and aids placement expansion whilst incurring minimal cost. Authors confirm that all relevant ethical standards for research conduct and dissemination have been met. The submitting author confirms that relevant ethical approval was granted, if applicable.","PeriodicalId":93766,"journal":{"name":"International journal of healthcare simulation : advances in theory and practice","volume":"1 4","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A103 The Future of Aiding Student Placement Expansion: is it simulation, is it sustainable?\",\"authors\":\"Shona Hill, Ben Hester, Ashley Duzy, Lenny Kistler, Racheal Bolton\",\"doi\":\"10.54531/zzal2905\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In recent years many Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) have recognized the benefits of Simulation Based Education (SBE) and incorporated it into their teaching programs, in some cases utilizing it to replace traditional ‘clinical placement’ hours [1]. This has been catalysed by the COVID-19 pandemic whereby there has been unprecedented demands on NHS services, forcing the industry to offer alternative placement models [2]. To contribute to placement expansion by offering a simulation-based student placement. We created a six week non-clinical, simulation placement designed to host two Physiotherapy students. The overarching objective of this placement was to enable students to create and run their own simulation training session by their final week. They were based in the simulation team and networked with other students and clinicians to guide their research and planning. We collated feedback from the students at the end of their six-week placement via anonymous, online Microsoft feedback forms. Throughout 2022 we ran this placement twice and collated data from the 4 Physiotherapy students, all who were in their second year of study. Thematic analysis suggested the most common skills students felt they gained were soft skills (i.e. organization and prioritization) and development of varied communication styles. Additional themes that were mentioned included simulation specific skills. There were two areas where students felt they were unable to develop due to the placement communicating with ‘real’ patients and clinical note writing. Students were asked to score their clinical knowledge relating to their chosen simulation topic area at the beginning and end of the placement. Scores increased from ‘Good’ (2 students) and ‘Average’ (2 students) at the beginning of the placement to ‘Good’ (1 student) and ‘Very Good’ (3 Students) at the end of the placement. Qualitative themes suggested the students felt the overall variety of activities and exposure to clinical scenarios/teams they may not have seen before was unique to this placement and both enjoyable and valuable. Previous studies have identified misconceptions relating to the purpose of simulation and its aims [1]. Our data reflected this concept as students rated their knowledge of simulation at the beginning of the placement as ‘Very Minimal’. However, our placement offering has proven to successfully increase this awareness and offer the opportunity to develop transferable skills and clinical knowledge in a way that is both exciting and aids placement expansion whilst incurring minimal cost. Authors confirm that all relevant ethical standards for research conduct and dissemination have been met. The submitting author confirms that relevant ethical approval was granted, if applicable.\",\"PeriodicalId\":93766,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of healthcare simulation : advances in theory and practice\",\"volume\":\"1 4\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of healthcare simulation : advances in theory and practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.54531/zzal2905\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of healthcare simulation : advances in theory and practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54531/zzal2905","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

近年来,许多高等教育机构(HEIs)已经认识到基于模拟的教育(SBE)的好处,并将其纳入他们的教学计划,在某些情况下利用它来取代传统的“临床实习”时间[1]。COVID-19大流行对NHS服务产生了前所未有的需求,迫使该行业提供替代的安置模式[2]。通过提供基于模拟的学生安置来促进安置扩展。我们创建了一个为期六周的非临床模拟实习,专门为两名物理治疗专业的学生设计。这次实习的首要目标是让学生在最后一周创建和运行自己的模拟训练课程。他们以模拟团队为基础,与其他学生和临床医生联网,指导他们的研究和计划。在学生们为期六周的实习结束后,我们通过匿名的微软在线反馈表格整理了他们的反馈。在整个2022年,我们进行了两次安置,并整理了4名物理治疗学生的数据,他们都是二年级的学生。专题分析显示,学生们认为他们获得的最常见技能是软技能(即组织和优先排序)和各种沟通风格的发展。提到的其他主题包括模拟特定技能。由于实习与“真实”病人的交流和临床记录的书写,学生们觉得他们在两个方面无法发展。在实习开始和结束时,学生们被要求对他们所选择的模拟主题领域的临床知识进行评分。分数从课程开始时的“好”(2名学生)和“一般”(2名学生)提高到课程结束时的“好”(1名学生)和“非常好”(3名学生)。定性主题表明,学生们觉得各种各样的活动,以及接触到他们以前可能从未见过的临床场景/团队,对这个实习来说是独一无二的,既愉快又有价值。先前的研究已经发现了与模拟的目的及其目标有关的误解[1]。我们的数据反映了这一概念,因为学生在安置开始时将他们的模拟知识评为“非常少”。然而,事实证明,我们提供的实习机会成功地提高了这种意识,并提供了发展可转移技能和临床知识的机会,这种方式既令人兴奋,又有助于扩大实习,同时成本最低。作者确认已符合研究行为和传播的所有相关伦理标准。提交作者确认已获得相关的伦理批准(如适用)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A103 The Future of Aiding Student Placement Expansion: is it simulation, is it sustainable?
In recent years many Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) have recognized the benefits of Simulation Based Education (SBE) and incorporated it into their teaching programs, in some cases utilizing it to replace traditional ‘clinical placement’ hours [1]. This has been catalysed by the COVID-19 pandemic whereby there has been unprecedented demands on NHS services, forcing the industry to offer alternative placement models [2]. To contribute to placement expansion by offering a simulation-based student placement. We created a six week non-clinical, simulation placement designed to host two Physiotherapy students. The overarching objective of this placement was to enable students to create and run their own simulation training session by their final week. They were based in the simulation team and networked with other students and clinicians to guide their research and planning. We collated feedback from the students at the end of their six-week placement via anonymous, online Microsoft feedback forms. Throughout 2022 we ran this placement twice and collated data from the 4 Physiotherapy students, all who were in their second year of study. Thematic analysis suggested the most common skills students felt they gained were soft skills (i.e. organization and prioritization) and development of varied communication styles. Additional themes that were mentioned included simulation specific skills. There were two areas where students felt they were unable to develop due to the placement communicating with ‘real’ patients and clinical note writing. Students were asked to score their clinical knowledge relating to their chosen simulation topic area at the beginning and end of the placement. Scores increased from ‘Good’ (2 students) and ‘Average’ (2 students) at the beginning of the placement to ‘Good’ (1 student) and ‘Very Good’ (3 Students) at the end of the placement. Qualitative themes suggested the students felt the overall variety of activities and exposure to clinical scenarios/teams they may not have seen before was unique to this placement and both enjoyable and valuable. Previous studies have identified misconceptions relating to the purpose of simulation and its aims [1]. Our data reflected this concept as students rated their knowledge of simulation at the beginning of the placement as ‘Very Minimal’. However, our placement offering has proven to successfully increase this awareness and offer the opportunity to develop transferable skills and clinical knowledge in a way that is both exciting and aids placement expansion whilst incurring minimal cost. Authors confirm that all relevant ethical standards for research conduct and dissemination have been met. The submitting author confirms that relevant ethical approval was granted, if applicable.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信