政府医学院本科医学生学习风格偏好及其对学业成绩的影响

Shilu Mariam Zachariah, S Karthikeyan, K S Deepak
{"title":"政府医学院本科医学生学习风格偏好及其对学业成绩的影响","authors":"Shilu Mariam Zachariah, S Karthikeyan, K S Deepak","doi":"10.46347/jmsh.v9i2.22.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Learners have their own preferences in receiving and processing information. Finding out different learning styles of students is important to provide students with a better learning experience. Aims: To find out the different learning styles of students and association of gender and academic performance with learning styles. Methods and Material: A cross-sectional study was conducted among 100 medical students using convenience sampling method. The questionnaire used in the study was Honey and Mumford Learning Style Questionnaire. Learning styles were accordingly described as Activist, Theorist, Pragmatist and Reflector. Socio-demographic variables like age and gender as well as previous university examination score of the students were also collected. The data was analysed in terms of proportions, chi-square test and one-way ANOVA. Results: Out of 100 students, 74% were females and the remaining 16% were males. The highest mean value of the scores was found for reflector style of learning (15.59±2.4) followed by pragmatist (13.4±2.6). The lowest mean score was found for activist style of learning (12.26±3.0). 51.1% of students showed very strong inclination for activist learning style, 40% of students showed a strong inclination for reflector learning style, 45.6% had a moderate preference for theorist learning style and 55.6% of students had a moderate preference for pragmatist learning style. Conclusions: The students had more preference for activist and reflector learning styles. Gender and previous academic performance did not show any significant association with the learning styles. Keywords: Learning styles, Honey and Mumford questionnaire, Activist, Theorist, Pragmatist Reflector, academic performance","PeriodicalId":33653,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Sciences and Health","volume":"6 2","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Learning Style Preferences and Its Effect on Academic Performance Among Undergraduate Medical Students at Government Medical College, Palakkad\",\"authors\":\"Shilu Mariam Zachariah, S Karthikeyan, K S Deepak\",\"doi\":\"10.46347/jmsh.v9i2.22.4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Learners have their own preferences in receiving and processing information. Finding out different learning styles of students is important to provide students with a better learning experience. Aims: To find out the different learning styles of students and association of gender and academic performance with learning styles. Methods and Material: A cross-sectional study was conducted among 100 medical students using convenience sampling method. The questionnaire used in the study was Honey and Mumford Learning Style Questionnaire. Learning styles were accordingly described as Activist, Theorist, Pragmatist and Reflector. Socio-demographic variables like age and gender as well as previous university examination score of the students were also collected. The data was analysed in terms of proportions, chi-square test and one-way ANOVA. Results: Out of 100 students, 74% were females and the remaining 16% were males. The highest mean value of the scores was found for reflector style of learning (15.59±2.4) followed by pragmatist (13.4±2.6). The lowest mean score was found for activist style of learning (12.26±3.0). 51.1% of students showed very strong inclination for activist learning style, 40% of students showed a strong inclination for reflector learning style, 45.6% had a moderate preference for theorist learning style and 55.6% of students had a moderate preference for pragmatist learning style. Conclusions: The students had more preference for activist and reflector learning styles. Gender and previous academic performance did not show any significant association with the learning styles. Keywords: Learning styles, Honey and Mumford questionnaire, Activist, Theorist, Pragmatist Reflector, academic performance\",\"PeriodicalId\":33653,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Medical Sciences and Health\",\"volume\":\"6 2\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Medical Sciences and Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.46347/jmsh.v9i2.22.4\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Sciences and Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46347/jmsh.v9i2.22.4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

学习者在接收和处理信息时有自己的偏好。找出学生不同的学习风格对于为学生提供更好的学习体验很重要。目的:了解大学生不同的学习风格,以及性别、学业成绩与学习风格的关系。方法与材料:采用方便抽样法对100名医学生进行横断面调查。本研究使用的调查问卷为Honey and Mumford Learning Style questionnaire。相应地,学习风格被描述为积极主义者、理论家、实用主义者和反思者。还收集了学生的年龄、性别等社会人口变量以及以前的大学考试成绩。数据分析采用比例、卡方检验和单因素方差分析。结果:100名学生中,女生占74%,男生占16%。平均得分最高的是反射式学习(15.59±2.4),其次是实用主义学习(13.4±2.6)。积极型学习方式的平均得分最低(12.26±3.0)。51.1%的学生对积极主义学习风格有很强的倾向,40%的学生对反思式学习风格有很强的倾向,45.6%的学生对理论主义学习风格有中等偏好,55.6%的学生对实用主义学习风格有中等偏好。结论:学生更倾向于积极型和反思型学习方式。性别和以前的学习成绩与学习风格没有任何显著的联系。关键词:学习风格,霍尼和芒福德问卷,积极分子,理论家,实用主义者,反思者,学习成绩
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Learning Style Preferences and Its Effect on Academic Performance Among Undergraduate Medical Students at Government Medical College, Palakkad
Introduction: Learners have their own preferences in receiving and processing information. Finding out different learning styles of students is important to provide students with a better learning experience. Aims: To find out the different learning styles of students and association of gender and academic performance with learning styles. Methods and Material: A cross-sectional study was conducted among 100 medical students using convenience sampling method. The questionnaire used in the study was Honey and Mumford Learning Style Questionnaire. Learning styles were accordingly described as Activist, Theorist, Pragmatist and Reflector. Socio-demographic variables like age and gender as well as previous university examination score of the students were also collected. The data was analysed in terms of proportions, chi-square test and one-way ANOVA. Results: Out of 100 students, 74% were females and the remaining 16% were males. The highest mean value of the scores was found for reflector style of learning (15.59±2.4) followed by pragmatist (13.4±2.6). The lowest mean score was found for activist style of learning (12.26±3.0). 51.1% of students showed very strong inclination for activist learning style, 40% of students showed a strong inclination for reflector learning style, 45.6% had a moderate preference for theorist learning style and 55.6% of students had a moderate preference for pragmatist learning style. Conclusions: The students had more preference for activist and reflector learning styles. Gender and previous academic performance did not show any significant association with the learning styles. Keywords: Learning styles, Honey and Mumford questionnaire, Activist, Theorist, Pragmatist Reflector, academic performance
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书