不同方程对女性格斗运动员静息代谢率预测的评价

IF 1.3 Q3 SPORT SCIENCES
Erkan Tortu, Abdulkadir Birol, Meryem Aksarı
{"title":"不同方程对女性格斗运动员静息代谢率预测的评价","authors":"Erkan Tortu, Abdulkadir Birol, Meryem Aksarı","doi":"10.26773/mjssm.230906","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Only a few studies have produced equations that can estimate resting metabolic rate (RMR) in female athletes, but the accuracy of these equations for combat athletes has not yet been tested. The aim of this study was to evaluate the 12 different equations which are commonly using to determine resting metabolite rate (RMR) in the literature. Twenty-three female combat sport athletes (24.23± 3.39 years; 166.8 ± 5.3 cm; 63.13±6.53 kg; 8.78±3.19 experience years.; 56.40±3.43 VO2 mL/kg/min) were participated this study in voluntarily basis. A cross-validation approach used to compare the accuracy of 12 commonly prediction equations with measured RMR by indirect calorimetry to determine RMR in female combat sports athletes. All the predictive equation was underestimated RMR when compared with the measured RMR (p < 0.05) and the smallest mean difference (92.46 ± 210.38 kcal·d-1) was observed for Altman &amp; Dittmer equation amongst the 12 predictive equations. The Altman &amp; Dittmer equation was accurately predicted 16 out of 30 subjects’ RMR value within the range ±10%. However, based on the Bland–Altman plots, the prediction equations were not accurately nor precisely predicted RMR in the current sample of female combat sport athletes. The results in the present study showed that the Altman &amp; Dittmer equation is most suitable equation to predict RMR amongst 12 equations. Although the Altman &amp; Dittmer equation was resulted with smallest mean difference, it seems that there is need to further research with longitudinal approach to understand the effects of training intensity and body mass changes on RMR in order to develop the formulas already exist used commonly.","PeriodicalId":18942,"journal":{"name":"Montenegrin Journal of Sports Science and Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of Different Equations for Resting Metabolic Rate Prediction in Female Combat Sports Athletes\",\"authors\":\"Erkan Tortu, Abdulkadir Birol, Meryem Aksarı\",\"doi\":\"10.26773/mjssm.230906\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Only a few studies have produced equations that can estimate resting metabolic rate (RMR) in female athletes, but the accuracy of these equations for combat athletes has not yet been tested. The aim of this study was to evaluate the 12 different equations which are commonly using to determine resting metabolite rate (RMR) in the literature. Twenty-three female combat sport athletes (24.23± 3.39 years; 166.8 ± 5.3 cm; 63.13±6.53 kg; 8.78±3.19 experience years.; 56.40±3.43 VO2 mL/kg/min) were participated this study in voluntarily basis. A cross-validation approach used to compare the accuracy of 12 commonly prediction equations with measured RMR by indirect calorimetry to determine RMR in female combat sports athletes. All the predictive equation was underestimated RMR when compared with the measured RMR (p < 0.05) and the smallest mean difference (92.46 ± 210.38 kcal·d-1) was observed for Altman &amp; Dittmer equation amongst the 12 predictive equations. The Altman &amp; Dittmer equation was accurately predicted 16 out of 30 subjects’ RMR value within the range ±10%. However, based on the Bland–Altman plots, the prediction equations were not accurately nor precisely predicted RMR in the current sample of female combat sport athletes. The results in the present study showed that the Altman &amp; Dittmer equation is most suitable equation to predict RMR amongst 12 equations. Although the Altman &amp; Dittmer equation was resulted with smallest mean difference, it seems that there is need to further research with longitudinal approach to understand the effects of training intensity and body mass changes on RMR in order to develop the formulas already exist used commonly.\",\"PeriodicalId\":18942,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Montenegrin Journal of Sports Science and Medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Montenegrin Journal of Sports Science and Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26773/mjssm.230906\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SPORT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Montenegrin Journal of Sports Science and Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26773/mjssm.230906","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

只有少数研究得出了可以估计女运动员静息代谢率(RMR)的方程,但这些方程对格斗运动员的准确性尚未得到测试。本研究的目的是评估文献中通常用于确定静息代谢率(RMR)的12种不同方程。女搏击运动员23名(24.23±3.39岁);166.8±5.3 cm;63.13±6.53公斤;8.78±3.19工作年限;(56.40±3.43)VO2 mL/kg/min,自愿参加本研究。交叉验证方法用于比较12种常用预测方程与间接量热法测量的RMR的准确性,以确定女性格斗运动运动员的RMR。与实测RMR相比,所有预测方程均低估了RMR (p <0.05),平均差异最小(92.46±210.38 kcal·d-1)。12个预测方程中的迪特默方程。奥特曼&;Dittmer方程准确预测了30名受试者中16名的RMR值在±10%范围内。然而,基于Bland-Altman图,预测方程不能准确或精确地预测当前女性格斗运动运动员样本中的RMR。本研究结果表明,Altman &在12个方程中,Dittmer方程是最适合预测RMR的方程。尽管奥特曼&Dittmer方程的平均差最小,似乎还需要进一步的纵向研究来了解训练强度和体重变化对RMR的影响,以发展现有的常用公式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of Different Equations for Resting Metabolic Rate Prediction in Female Combat Sports Athletes
Only a few studies have produced equations that can estimate resting metabolic rate (RMR) in female athletes, but the accuracy of these equations for combat athletes has not yet been tested. The aim of this study was to evaluate the 12 different equations which are commonly using to determine resting metabolite rate (RMR) in the literature. Twenty-three female combat sport athletes (24.23± 3.39 years; 166.8 ± 5.3 cm; 63.13±6.53 kg; 8.78±3.19 experience years.; 56.40±3.43 VO2 mL/kg/min) were participated this study in voluntarily basis. A cross-validation approach used to compare the accuracy of 12 commonly prediction equations with measured RMR by indirect calorimetry to determine RMR in female combat sports athletes. All the predictive equation was underestimated RMR when compared with the measured RMR (p < 0.05) and the smallest mean difference (92.46 ± 210.38 kcal·d-1) was observed for Altman & Dittmer equation amongst the 12 predictive equations. The Altman & Dittmer equation was accurately predicted 16 out of 30 subjects’ RMR value within the range ±10%. However, based on the Bland–Altman plots, the prediction equations were not accurately nor precisely predicted RMR in the current sample of female combat sport athletes. The results in the present study showed that the Altman & Dittmer equation is most suitable equation to predict RMR amongst 12 equations. Although the Altman & Dittmer equation was resulted with smallest mean difference, it seems that there is need to further research with longitudinal approach to understand the effects of training intensity and body mass changes on RMR in order to develop the formulas already exist used commonly.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊介绍: MJSSM covers all aspects of sports science and medicine; all clinical aspects of exercise, health, and sport; exercise physiology and biophysical investigation of sports performance; sport biomechanics; sports nutrition; rehabilitation, physiotherapy; sports psychology; sport pedagogy, sport history, sport philosophy, sport sociology, sport management; and all aspects of scientific support of the sports coaches from the natural, social and humanistic side.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信