对“关于使用纳米钙分散体作为脱酸剂的注意事项”的答复

IF 0.8 4区 化学 0 ARCHAEOLOGY
Piero Baglioni, David Chelazzi, Rodorico Giorgi, Giovanna Poggi
{"title":"对“关于使用纳米钙分散体作为脱酸剂的注意事项”的答复","authors":"Piero Baglioni, David Chelazzi, Rodorico Giorgi, Giovanna Poggi","doi":"10.1080/00393630.2023.2260631","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTThe application of Ca(OH)2 nanoparticles dispersed in short chain alcohols to adjust the pH of acidic cellulosic substrates (paper, canvas, and wood) has been introduced and largely assessed in conservation practice, and commercial products are available on the market. Recently, some concerns about this methodology were expressed in a technical note (‘A Note of Caution on the Use of Calcium Nanoparticle Dispersions as Deacidifying Agents’ by Cremonesi (2023)). The main criticism is that carbonation of the hydroxide particles into calcium carbonate could be too slow, and the Ca(OH)2 remaining on the fibers might cause structural damage to cellulose by producing high alkalinity in situ, when water absorbed by the alcohol dispersion or by the cellulose-based support causes dissociation in the nanoparticles. However, in Cremonesi’s note, no accurate description of the application method was given, and some fundamental information already present in the literature was overlooked. Here, we give a rebuttal of Cremonesi’s conclusions, providing: (1) further evidence that the correct application of the particles’ dispersions results in carbonation and in neutral pH values in a few days; and (2) an up-to-date literature survey, in which the Ca(OH)2 nanoparticles’ carbonation kinetics is studied in detail, and potential structural damage to cellulosic materials in an alkaline environment is evaluated and ruled out.KEYWORDS: DeacidificationpH adjustmentpaper restorationcalcium hydroxide nanoparticles AcknowledgementsThe Consorzio Interuniversitario per lo Sviluppo dei Sistemi a Grande Interfase, CSGI (Center for Colloid and Surface Science) is gratefully acknowledged for financial support.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Additional informationFundingThis work was supported by CSGI.","PeriodicalId":21990,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Conservation","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Reply to ‘A Note of Caution on the Use of Calcium Nanoparticle Dispersions as Deacidifying Agents’\",\"authors\":\"Piero Baglioni, David Chelazzi, Rodorico Giorgi, Giovanna Poggi\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00393630.2023.2260631\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACTThe application of Ca(OH)2 nanoparticles dispersed in short chain alcohols to adjust the pH of acidic cellulosic substrates (paper, canvas, and wood) has been introduced and largely assessed in conservation practice, and commercial products are available on the market. Recently, some concerns about this methodology were expressed in a technical note (‘A Note of Caution on the Use of Calcium Nanoparticle Dispersions as Deacidifying Agents’ by Cremonesi (2023)). The main criticism is that carbonation of the hydroxide particles into calcium carbonate could be too slow, and the Ca(OH)2 remaining on the fibers might cause structural damage to cellulose by producing high alkalinity in situ, when water absorbed by the alcohol dispersion or by the cellulose-based support causes dissociation in the nanoparticles. However, in Cremonesi’s note, no accurate description of the application method was given, and some fundamental information already present in the literature was overlooked. Here, we give a rebuttal of Cremonesi’s conclusions, providing: (1) further evidence that the correct application of the particles’ dispersions results in carbonation and in neutral pH values in a few days; and (2) an up-to-date literature survey, in which the Ca(OH)2 nanoparticles’ carbonation kinetics is studied in detail, and potential structural damage to cellulosic materials in an alkaline environment is evaluated and ruled out.KEYWORDS: DeacidificationpH adjustmentpaper restorationcalcium hydroxide nanoparticles AcknowledgementsThe Consorzio Interuniversitario per lo Sviluppo dei Sistemi a Grande Interfase, CSGI (Center for Colloid and Surface Science) is gratefully acknowledged for financial support.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Additional informationFundingThis work was supported by CSGI.\",\"PeriodicalId\":21990,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Studies in Conservation\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Studies in Conservation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00393630.2023.2260631\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ARCHAEOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in Conservation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00393630.2023.2260631","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHAEOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要本文介绍了分散在短链醇中的Ca(OH)2纳米粒子在酸性纤维素基质(纸、帆布和木材)pH调节中的应用,并在保护实践中进行了大量的评估,并有商业化产品上市。最近,在一份技术说明中表达了对这种方法的一些担忧(Cremonesi(2023)的“关于使用钙纳米颗粒分散体作为脱酸剂的注意事项”)。主要的批评是氢氧化物颗粒碳酸化成碳酸钙的速度太慢,当水被醇分散体或纤维素基载体吸收时,可能会在原位产生高碱度,从而对纤维素造成结构破坏。然而,在Cremonesi的笔记中,没有给出应用方法的准确描述,并且忽略了文献中已经存在的一些基本信息。在这里,我们对Cremonesi的结论进行了反驳,提供了:(1)进一步的证据表明,正确应用颗粒分散剂会导致碳化,并在几天内达到中性pH值;(2)最新文献综述,详细研究了Ca(OH)2纳米颗粒的碳化动力学,并评估和排除了碱性环境下对纤维素材料的潜在结构损伤。关键词:脱酸;ph值调整;纸张修复;氢氧化钙纳米颗粒;披露声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。本研究由CSGI支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Reply to ‘A Note of Caution on the Use of Calcium Nanoparticle Dispersions as Deacidifying Agents’
ABSTRACTThe application of Ca(OH)2 nanoparticles dispersed in short chain alcohols to adjust the pH of acidic cellulosic substrates (paper, canvas, and wood) has been introduced and largely assessed in conservation practice, and commercial products are available on the market. Recently, some concerns about this methodology were expressed in a technical note (‘A Note of Caution on the Use of Calcium Nanoparticle Dispersions as Deacidifying Agents’ by Cremonesi (2023)). The main criticism is that carbonation of the hydroxide particles into calcium carbonate could be too slow, and the Ca(OH)2 remaining on the fibers might cause structural damage to cellulose by producing high alkalinity in situ, when water absorbed by the alcohol dispersion or by the cellulose-based support causes dissociation in the nanoparticles. However, in Cremonesi’s note, no accurate description of the application method was given, and some fundamental information already present in the literature was overlooked. Here, we give a rebuttal of Cremonesi’s conclusions, providing: (1) further evidence that the correct application of the particles’ dispersions results in carbonation and in neutral pH values in a few days; and (2) an up-to-date literature survey, in which the Ca(OH)2 nanoparticles’ carbonation kinetics is studied in detail, and potential structural damage to cellulosic materials in an alkaline environment is evaluated and ruled out.KEYWORDS: DeacidificationpH adjustmentpaper restorationcalcium hydroxide nanoparticles AcknowledgementsThe Consorzio Interuniversitario per lo Sviluppo dei Sistemi a Grande Interfase, CSGI (Center for Colloid and Surface Science) is gratefully acknowledged for financial support.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Additional informationFundingThis work was supported by CSGI.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Studies in Conservation
Studies in Conservation 化学-分析化学
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
12.50%
发文量
73
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Studies in Conservation is the premier international peer-reviewed journal for the conservation of historic and artistic works. The intended readership includes the conservation professional in the broadest sense of the term: practising conservators of all types of object, conservation, heritage and museum scientists, collection or conservation managers, teachers and students of conservation, and academic researchers in the subject areas of arts, archaeology, the built heritage, materials history, art technological research and material culture. Studies in Conservation publishes original work on a range of subjects including, but not limited to, examination methods for works of art, new research in the analysis of artistic materials, mechanisms of deterioration, advances in conservation practice, novel methods of treatment, conservation issues in display and storage, preventive conservation, issues of collection care, conservation history and ethics, and the history of materials and technological processes. Scientific content is not necessary, and the editors encourage the submission of practical articles, review papers, position papers on best practice and the philosophy and ethics of collecting and preservation, to help maintain the traditional balance of the journal. Whatever the subject matter, accounts of routine procedures are not accepted, except where these lead to results that are sufficiently novel and/or significant to be of general interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信