系统回顾小学班主任的数学教与学观

Q3 Social Sciences
LUMAT Pub Date : 2023-10-31 DOI:10.31129/lumat.11.2.2055
Eunji Kim, Eetu Mallat, Jorma Joutsenlahti
{"title":"系统回顾小学班主任的数学教与学观","authors":"Eunji Kim, Eetu Mallat, Jorma Joutsenlahti","doi":"10.31129/lumat.11.2.2055","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The current study aimed (1) to analyse teachers’ view profiles from positive to negative based on the analysis of influencing factors and (2) to investigate the most studied concepts and methods in this context. According to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses 2020 guidelines, we conducted a comprehensive review of 25 peer-reviewed articles published between January 2010 and December 2022. Our findings show a landscape in which concepts related to mathematics teaching and learning often intersect with other domains. Nevertheless, a distinction exists in the definition of the fundamental concept, with limited attention given to mathematics learning and the role of students in contrast to the focus on mathematics teaching and the role of teachers. Our research highlights the necessity of thorough exploration of the dynamic factors that influence these views and their associated outcomes, categorised as (A) mutual consistency, (B) weak consistency, and (C) inconsistency, each providing distinct implications for support needs. Additionally, from an ontological perspective on affect, many studies overlook the notion of 'view' as a state or trait characteristic, potentially leading to inappropriate method selection. Therefore, we propose recommendations for future research, advocating for methodological precision, expanded object exploration, dynamic profiling, and the inclusion of diverse teacher categories.","PeriodicalId":36856,"journal":{"name":"LUMAT","volume":"832 ","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"systematic review of primary school class teachers views of mathematics teaching and learning\",\"authors\":\"Eunji Kim, Eetu Mallat, Jorma Joutsenlahti\",\"doi\":\"10.31129/lumat.11.2.2055\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The current study aimed (1) to analyse teachers’ view profiles from positive to negative based on the analysis of influencing factors and (2) to investigate the most studied concepts and methods in this context. According to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses 2020 guidelines, we conducted a comprehensive review of 25 peer-reviewed articles published between January 2010 and December 2022. Our findings show a landscape in which concepts related to mathematics teaching and learning often intersect with other domains. Nevertheless, a distinction exists in the definition of the fundamental concept, with limited attention given to mathematics learning and the role of students in contrast to the focus on mathematics teaching and the role of teachers. Our research highlights the necessity of thorough exploration of the dynamic factors that influence these views and their associated outcomes, categorised as (A) mutual consistency, (B) weak consistency, and (C) inconsistency, each providing distinct implications for support needs. Additionally, from an ontological perspective on affect, many studies overlook the notion of 'view' as a state or trait characteristic, potentially leading to inappropriate method selection. Therefore, we propose recommendations for future research, advocating for methodological precision, expanded object exploration, dynamic profiling, and the inclusion of diverse teacher categories.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36856,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"LUMAT\",\"volume\":\"832 \",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"LUMAT\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31129/lumat.11.2.2055\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LUMAT","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31129/lumat.11.2.2055","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在(1)在分析影响因素的基础上,从正面到负面分析教师的观点概况;(2)对这一背景下研究最多的概念和方法进行调查。根据系统评价和荟萃分析2020指南的首选报告项目,我们对2010年1月至2022年12月期间发表的25篇同行评议文章进行了全面审查。我们的研究结果显示,与数学教学和学习相关的概念经常与其他领域交叉。然而,在基本概念的定义上存在差异,与对数学教学和教师作用的关注相比,对数学学习和学生作用的关注有限。我们的研究强调了深入探索影响这些观点及其相关结果的动态因素的必要性,这些因素被分类为(A)相互一致性,(B)弱一致性和(C)不一致性,每一个都对支持需求提供了不同的影响。此外,从情感的本体论角度来看,许多研究忽视了“观点”作为一种状态或特质特征的概念,这可能导致不适当的方法选择。因此,我们对未来的研究提出了建议,主张方法的精确性,扩大对象探索,动态分析,并包括不同的教师类别。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
systematic review of primary school class teachers views of mathematics teaching and learning
The current study aimed (1) to analyse teachers’ view profiles from positive to negative based on the analysis of influencing factors and (2) to investigate the most studied concepts and methods in this context. According to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses 2020 guidelines, we conducted a comprehensive review of 25 peer-reviewed articles published between January 2010 and December 2022. Our findings show a landscape in which concepts related to mathematics teaching and learning often intersect with other domains. Nevertheless, a distinction exists in the definition of the fundamental concept, with limited attention given to mathematics learning and the role of students in contrast to the focus on mathematics teaching and the role of teachers. Our research highlights the necessity of thorough exploration of the dynamic factors that influence these views and their associated outcomes, categorised as (A) mutual consistency, (B) weak consistency, and (C) inconsistency, each providing distinct implications for support needs. Additionally, from an ontological perspective on affect, many studies overlook the notion of 'view' as a state or trait characteristic, potentially leading to inappropriate method selection. Therefore, we propose recommendations for future research, advocating for methodological precision, expanded object exploration, dynamic profiling, and the inclusion of diverse teacher categories.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
LUMAT
LUMAT Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信