亚太地区相互竞争的地区主义?自由贸易协定中的各种可持续发展问题

IF 0.4 Q4 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS
Erja Kettunen
{"title":"亚太地区相互竞争的地区主义?自由贸易协定中的各种可持续发展问题","authors":"Erja Kettunen","doi":"10.1080/10402659.2023.2268020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The essay explores the inclusion of sustainability commitments in free trade agreements (FTAs) in the Asia-Pacific and the potential differences in their emphases that may reflect “competing regionalisms” in the region. Discussing the geo-economics of cross-border regionalism, the diverse trade agreements are compared as to provisions on sustainable development, and reflected with European Union FTAs. Findings indicate a lack of sustainable development issues in the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership and in China’s FTAs with regional neighbors, whereas the Trans-Pacific Partnership, and its successor, the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership, have substantial commitments on environmental and labor protection. The results suggest that the role of advanced economies as norm setters in sustainability policies may be challenged by a shift toward other emphases in Asia-Pacific FTAs. This contributes to our understanding of the cross-currents in global trade regime leading to competing regionalisms, and therefore, the limits to multilateralizing sustainability issues.","PeriodicalId":51831,"journal":{"name":"Peace Review-A Journal of Social Justice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Competing Regionalisms in the Asia-Pacific? Versatile Sustainable Development Issues in FTAs\",\"authors\":\"Erja Kettunen\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10402659.2023.2268020\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The essay explores the inclusion of sustainability commitments in free trade agreements (FTAs) in the Asia-Pacific and the potential differences in their emphases that may reflect “competing regionalisms” in the region. Discussing the geo-economics of cross-border regionalism, the diverse trade agreements are compared as to provisions on sustainable development, and reflected with European Union FTAs. Findings indicate a lack of sustainable development issues in the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership and in China’s FTAs with regional neighbors, whereas the Trans-Pacific Partnership, and its successor, the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership, have substantial commitments on environmental and labor protection. The results suggest that the role of advanced economies as norm setters in sustainability policies may be challenged by a shift toward other emphases in Asia-Pacific FTAs. This contributes to our understanding of the cross-currents in global trade regime leading to competing regionalisms, and therefore, the limits to multilateralizing sustainability issues.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51831,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Peace Review-A Journal of Social Justice\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Peace Review-A Journal of Social Justice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10402659.2023.2268020\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Peace Review-A Journal of Social Justice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10402659.2023.2268020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文探讨了亚太地区自由贸易协定(FTAs)中可持续性承诺的内容,以及它们在强调重点方面的潜在差异,这些差异可能反映了该地区的“竞争性区域主义”。讨论跨境区域主义的地缘经济学,比较了不同贸易协定对可持续发展的规定,并以欧盟自由贸易协定为例进行了反映。研究结果表明,在区域全面经济伙伴关系协定和中国与区域邻国的自贸协定中,缺乏可持续发展问题,而跨太平洋伙伴关系协定及其继任者《全面与进步跨太平洋伙伴关系协定》在环境和劳工保护方面做出了实质性承诺。研究结果表明,发达经济体在可持续性政策中作为规范制定者的角色可能会受到亚太自贸协定转向其他重点的挑战。这有助于我们理解全球贸易体制中导致相互竞争的区域主义的交叉趋势,从而了解可持续性问题多边化的局限性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Competing Regionalisms in the Asia-Pacific? Versatile Sustainable Development Issues in FTAs
The essay explores the inclusion of sustainability commitments in free trade agreements (FTAs) in the Asia-Pacific and the potential differences in their emphases that may reflect “competing regionalisms” in the region. Discussing the geo-economics of cross-border regionalism, the diverse trade agreements are compared as to provisions on sustainable development, and reflected with European Union FTAs. Findings indicate a lack of sustainable development issues in the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership and in China’s FTAs with regional neighbors, whereas the Trans-Pacific Partnership, and its successor, the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership, have substantial commitments on environmental and labor protection. The results suggest that the role of advanced economies as norm setters in sustainability policies may be challenged by a shift toward other emphases in Asia-Pacific FTAs. This contributes to our understanding of the cross-currents in global trade regime leading to competing regionalisms, and therefore, the limits to multilateralizing sustainability issues.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Peace Review-A Journal of Social Justice
Peace Review-A Journal of Social Justice INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
57
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信