利益公司整合竞争的制度逻辑:挑战与实践

IF 1.2 Q4 MANAGEMENT
Rifat Sharmelly, David Tomczyk
{"title":"利益公司整合竞争的制度逻辑:挑战与实践","authors":"Rifat Sharmelly, David Tomczyk","doi":"10.1177/03063070231206533","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Drawing on institutional logics, this study empirically examines challenges faced by benefit corporations that are at the crossroads of competing logics—need-based social logic to do right by society and demand-based market logic to generate adequate profit for sustaining operations—and the practices that such organizations adopt to manage these challenges to maintain their hybrid nature. Examining 30 benefit corporations from the United States, this study finds multiple sets of primary challenges and empirically specifies that benefit corporations should integrate competing institutional logics by actively managing both internal dynamics in the organizations and external relations to be successful. The article further identifies benefit corporations that were unsuccessful in combining both logics, and thus, has implications for both the literature and management practice.","PeriodicalId":46142,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF GENERAL MANAGEMENT","volume":"46 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Integrating competing institutional logics by benefit corporations: Challenges and practices\",\"authors\":\"Rifat Sharmelly, David Tomczyk\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/03063070231206533\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Drawing on institutional logics, this study empirically examines challenges faced by benefit corporations that are at the crossroads of competing logics—need-based social logic to do right by society and demand-based market logic to generate adequate profit for sustaining operations—and the practices that such organizations adopt to manage these challenges to maintain their hybrid nature. Examining 30 benefit corporations from the United States, this study finds multiple sets of primary challenges and empirically specifies that benefit corporations should integrate competing institutional logics by actively managing both internal dynamics in the organizations and external relations to be successful. The article further identifies benefit corporations that were unsuccessful in combining both logics, and thus, has implications for both the literature and management practice.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46142,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JOURNAL OF GENERAL MANAGEMENT\",\"volume\":\"46 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JOURNAL OF GENERAL MANAGEMENT\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/03063070231206533\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF GENERAL MANAGEMENT","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03063070231206533","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

利用制度逻辑,本研究从经验上考察了处于竞争逻辑十字路口的福利公司所面临的挑战——以需求为基础的社会逻辑为社会做正确的事情,以需求为基础的市场逻辑为持续运营产生足够的利润——以及这些组织采取的应对这些挑战以保持其混合性质的实践。通过对美国30家利益公司的考察,本文发现了多组主要挑战,并实证地指出,利益公司应该通过积极管理组织内部动态和外部关系来整合竞争的制度逻辑,以取得成功。本文进一步确定了未能成功结合这两种逻辑的利益公司,因此,对文献和管理实践都有启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Integrating competing institutional logics by benefit corporations: Challenges and practices
Drawing on institutional logics, this study empirically examines challenges faced by benefit corporations that are at the crossroads of competing logics—need-based social logic to do right by society and demand-based market logic to generate adequate profit for sustaining operations—and the practices that such organizations adopt to manage these challenges to maintain their hybrid nature. Examining 30 benefit corporations from the United States, this study finds multiple sets of primary challenges and empirically specifies that benefit corporations should integrate competing institutional logics by actively managing both internal dynamics in the organizations and external relations to be successful. The article further identifies benefit corporations that were unsuccessful in combining both logics, and thus, has implications for both the literature and management practice.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
33.30%
发文量
18
期刊介绍: Journal of General Management is quarterly peer reviewed journal, with a mission to provide thought leadership by publishing articles on managerial practices with organisation-wide or cross-functional implications. We seek original theoretical and practical insights into general management in all types of organisations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信