无框架民间心理学

IF 0.7 4区 管理学 Q3 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE
Giacomo Figà Talamanca
{"title":"无框架民间心理学","authors":"Giacomo Figà Talamanca","doi":"10.22503/inftars.xxiii.2023.2.8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, I will argue that the rise in hostility and polarization on social media is explainable by taking into account a radical difference between online and face-toface interaction. In everyday offline environments, socially shared and context-dependent norms frame the understanding of other people’s minds based on their behavior. I will argue that, on social media platforms, social cognition is distorted thanks to two deliberate design choices that are a means for financial gain for the platform’s designers: namely, the lack of socially shared norms on these platforms (entailed by what is known as context collapse) and their interfaces’ extreme user- centeredness. I will argue that such design features not only cause frustration in the understanding of others but encourage testimonial injustice in interaction.","PeriodicalId":41114,"journal":{"name":"Informacios Tarsadalom","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Frameless Folk Psychology\",\"authors\":\"Giacomo Figà Talamanca\",\"doi\":\"10.22503/inftars.xxiii.2023.2.8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper, I will argue that the rise in hostility and polarization on social media is explainable by taking into account a radical difference between online and face-toface interaction. In everyday offline environments, socially shared and context-dependent norms frame the understanding of other people’s minds based on their behavior. I will argue that, on social media platforms, social cognition is distorted thanks to two deliberate design choices that are a means for financial gain for the platform’s designers: namely, the lack of socially shared norms on these platforms (entailed by what is known as context collapse) and their interfaces’ extreme user- centeredness. I will argue that such design features not only cause frustration in the understanding of others but encourage testimonial injustice in interaction.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41114,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Informacios Tarsadalom\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Informacios Tarsadalom\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22503/inftars.xxiii.2023.2.8\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Informacios Tarsadalom","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22503/inftars.xxiii.2023.2.8","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在本文中,我将认为,考虑到在线和面对面互动之间的根本差异,社交媒体上敌意和两极分化的上升是可以解释的。在日常的离线环境中,社会共享和情境依赖的规范根据他人的行为来构建对他人思想的理解。我认为,在社交媒体平台上,社会认知是扭曲的,这要归功于两种故意的设计选择,这是平台设计师获得经济利益的一种手段:即,这些平台上缺乏社会共享规范(由所谓的上下文崩溃所导致),以及它们的界面极端以用户为中心。我认为,这样的设计特征不仅会导致理解他人的挫败感,还会在互动中鼓励不公正的证词。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Frameless Folk Psychology
In this paper, I will argue that the rise in hostility and polarization on social media is explainable by taking into account a radical difference between online and face-toface interaction. In everyday offline environments, socially shared and context-dependent norms frame the understanding of other people’s minds based on their behavior. I will argue that, on social media platforms, social cognition is distorted thanks to two deliberate design choices that are a means for financial gain for the platform’s designers: namely, the lack of socially shared norms on these platforms (entailed by what is known as context collapse) and their interfaces’ extreme user- centeredness. I will argue that such design features not only cause frustration in the understanding of others but encourage testimonial injustice in interaction.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Informacios Tarsadalom
Informacios Tarsadalom INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
33.30%
发文量
15
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信