心压容积导尿管能改善尿动力学评估吗?离体概念验证

Silje Ekroll Jahren, Dominik Obrist, Matthias Haenggi, Fiona Burkhard, Francesco Clavica
{"title":"心压容积导尿管能改善尿动力学评估吗?离体概念验证","authors":"Silje Ekroll Jahren, Dominik Obrist, Matthias Haenggi, Fiona Burkhard, Francesco Clavica","doi":"10.3389/fruro.2023.1258649","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aims To explore the feasibility of using pressure-volume (PV) catheters for cystometry. These catheters are well-established in cardiovascular research for simultaneous pressure and volume measurements in the left ventricle. Methods Urinary bladders with urethras were collected from domestic pigs for ex-vivo testing. Using a pump, bladders were filled up to 500ml at five different filling rates (15, 20, 25, 30, 35ml/min), and the resulting pressures and volumes were measured using a PV catheter. The bladder were compressed externally in three different areas (central, apex and outlet) to assess the PV catheter’s ability to detect local changes in bladder volume. Results Bladder pressure remained below 10cmH2O for all bladder filling rates. Volume measurements were compared with the volumes instilled by the pump (ground truth), proving high reproducibility and accuracy of the PV catheter measurements up to 400ml. Using the different sensing units of the PV catheter, local changes in bladder volumes could be identified and quantified. Conclusion The main advantage of PV catheters, compared to existing technology used in urology (e.g. conventional urodynamic testing), is the possibility to i) simultaneously measure bladder pressure and volumes and ii) identify local changes in bladder volume (e.g. caused by non-voiding contractions). Both could be useful in the clinical setting to improve the diagnosis and treatment of the Lower Urinary Tract Dysfunction (e.g. overactive/underactive bladder).","PeriodicalId":73113,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in urology","volume":"84 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Can cardiac pressure-volume catheters improve urodynamic assessment? an ex-vivo proof-of-concept\",\"authors\":\"Silje Ekroll Jahren, Dominik Obrist, Matthias Haenggi, Fiona Burkhard, Francesco Clavica\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fruro.2023.1258649\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Aims To explore the feasibility of using pressure-volume (PV) catheters for cystometry. These catheters are well-established in cardiovascular research for simultaneous pressure and volume measurements in the left ventricle. Methods Urinary bladders with urethras were collected from domestic pigs for ex-vivo testing. Using a pump, bladders were filled up to 500ml at five different filling rates (15, 20, 25, 30, 35ml/min), and the resulting pressures and volumes were measured using a PV catheter. The bladder were compressed externally in three different areas (central, apex and outlet) to assess the PV catheter’s ability to detect local changes in bladder volume. Results Bladder pressure remained below 10cmH2O for all bladder filling rates. Volume measurements were compared with the volumes instilled by the pump (ground truth), proving high reproducibility and accuracy of the PV catheter measurements up to 400ml. Using the different sensing units of the PV catheter, local changes in bladder volumes could be identified and quantified. Conclusion The main advantage of PV catheters, compared to existing technology used in urology (e.g. conventional urodynamic testing), is the possibility to i) simultaneously measure bladder pressure and volumes and ii) identify local changes in bladder volume (e.g. caused by non-voiding contractions). Both could be useful in the clinical setting to improve the diagnosis and treatment of the Lower Urinary Tract Dysfunction (e.g. overactive/underactive bladder).\",\"PeriodicalId\":73113,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in urology\",\"volume\":\"84 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in urology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fruro.2023.1258649\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in urology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fruro.2023.1258649","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的探讨压力容积(PV)导管用于膀胱造口术的可行性。这些导管在心血管研究中被证实可以同时测量左心室的压力和容积。方法取家猪膀胱标本进行离体检测。使用泵,以五种不同的填充速度(15、20、25、30、35ml/min)填充膀胱至500ml,并使用PV导管测量产生的压力和体积。膀胱在三个不同的区域(中央、尖端和出口)进行外部压缩,以评估PV导管检测膀胱局部体积变化的能力。结果所有膀胱充盈率膀胱压力均低于10cmH2O。将体积测量值与泵注入的体积(地面真实值)进行比较,证明PV导管测量高达400ml的高重复性和准确性。使用PV导管的不同传感单元,可以识别和量化膀胱体积的局部变化。结论与泌尿外科现有技术(如常规尿动力学检测)相比,PV导尿管的主要优点是可以同时测量膀胱压力和膀胱容量,可以识别膀胱体积的局部变化(如由非排尿性收缩引起)。这两种方法都可以用于临床诊断和治疗下尿路功能障碍(如膀胱过度活跃/活动不足)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Can cardiac pressure-volume catheters improve urodynamic assessment? an ex-vivo proof-of-concept
Aims To explore the feasibility of using pressure-volume (PV) catheters for cystometry. These catheters are well-established in cardiovascular research for simultaneous pressure and volume measurements in the left ventricle. Methods Urinary bladders with urethras were collected from domestic pigs for ex-vivo testing. Using a pump, bladders were filled up to 500ml at five different filling rates (15, 20, 25, 30, 35ml/min), and the resulting pressures and volumes were measured using a PV catheter. The bladder were compressed externally in three different areas (central, apex and outlet) to assess the PV catheter’s ability to detect local changes in bladder volume. Results Bladder pressure remained below 10cmH2O for all bladder filling rates. Volume measurements were compared with the volumes instilled by the pump (ground truth), proving high reproducibility and accuracy of the PV catheter measurements up to 400ml. Using the different sensing units of the PV catheter, local changes in bladder volumes could be identified and quantified. Conclusion The main advantage of PV catheters, compared to existing technology used in urology (e.g. conventional urodynamic testing), is the possibility to i) simultaneously measure bladder pressure and volumes and ii) identify local changes in bladder volume (e.g. caused by non-voiding contractions). Both could be useful in the clinical setting to improve the diagnosis and treatment of the Lower Urinary Tract Dysfunction (e.g. overactive/underactive bladder).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信