神经网络与模型平均方法在核β衰变半衰期预测中的比较研究

Weifeng Li, Xiaoyan Zhang, Y Niu, Zhongming Niu
{"title":"神经网络与模型平均方法在核β衰变半衰期预测中的比较研究","authors":"Weifeng Li, Xiaoyan Zhang, Y Niu, Zhongming Niu","doi":"10.1088/1361-6471/ad0314","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Nuclear $\\beta$-decay half-lives are investigated using the two-hidden-layer neural network and compared with the model averaging method. By carefully designing the input and hidden layers of the neural network, the neural network achieves better accuracy of nuclear $\\beta$-decay half-life predictions and well eliminates the too strong odd-even staggering predicted by the previous neural networks. For nuclei with half-lives less than $1$ second, the neural network can describe experimental half-lives within $1.6$ times. The half-life predictions of the neural network are further tested with the newly measured half-lives, demonstrating its reliable extrapolation ability not far from the training region. Compared to the model averaging method, the neural network has higher accuracy and smaller uncertainties of half-life predictions in the known region. When extrapolated to the unknown region, the half-life uncertainties of the neural network are still smaller than those of the model averaging method within about $5 - 10$ steps for nuclei with $35 \\lesssim Z \\lesssim 90$, while the model averaging method has smaller half-life uncertainties for nuclei near the drip line.","PeriodicalId":16770,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Physics G","volume":"87 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative study of neural network and model averaging methods in nuclear β-decay half-life predictions\",\"authors\":\"Weifeng Li, Xiaoyan Zhang, Y Niu, Zhongming Niu\",\"doi\":\"10.1088/1361-6471/ad0314\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Nuclear $\\\\beta$-decay half-lives are investigated using the two-hidden-layer neural network and compared with the model averaging method. By carefully designing the input and hidden layers of the neural network, the neural network achieves better accuracy of nuclear $\\\\beta$-decay half-life predictions and well eliminates the too strong odd-even staggering predicted by the previous neural networks. For nuclei with half-lives less than $1$ second, the neural network can describe experimental half-lives within $1.6$ times. The half-life predictions of the neural network are further tested with the newly measured half-lives, demonstrating its reliable extrapolation ability not far from the training region. Compared to the model averaging method, the neural network has higher accuracy and smaller uncertainties of half-life predictions in the known region. When extrapolated to the unknown region, the half-life uncertainties of the neural network are still smaller than those of the model averaging method within about $5 - 10$ steps for nuclei with $35 \\\\lesssim Z \\\\lesssim 90$, while the model averaging method has smaller half-life uncertainties for nuclei near the drip line.\",\"PeriodicalId\":16770,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Physics G\",\"volume\":\"87 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Physics G\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6471/ad0314\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Physics G","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6471/ad0314","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要利用两隐层神经网络研究了原子核$\beta$衰变半衰期,并与模型平均法进行了比较。通过对神经网络输入层和隐藏层的精心设计,神经网络对核$\beta$ -衰变半衰期的预测精度较高,并很好地消除了以往神经网络预测的强奇偶错开现象。对于半衰期小于$1$秒的原子核,神经网络可以在$1.6$秒内描述实验半衰期。用新测量的半衰期进一步验证了神经网络的半衰期预测,证明了其在离训练区域不远的地方有可靠的外推能力。与模型平均法相比,神经网络在已知区域的半衰期预测精度更高,不确定性更小。当外推到未知区域时,对于含有$35 \lesssim Z \lesssim 90$的核,神经网络的半衰期不确定度仍比模型平均方法的半衰期不确定度小$5 - 10$步,而对于滴线附近的核,模型平均方法的半衰期不确定度更小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative study of neural network and model averaging methods in nuclear β-decay half-life predictions
Abstract Nuclear $\beta$-decay half-lives are investigated using the two-hidden-layer neural network and compared with the model averaging method. By carefully designing the input and hidden layers of the neural network, the neural network achieves better accuracy of nuclear $\beta$-decay half-life predictions and well eliminates the too strong odd-even staggering predicted by the previous neural networks. For nuclei with half-lives less than $1$ second, the neural network can describe experimental half-lives within $1.6$ times. The half-life predictions of the neural network are further tested with the newly measured half-lives, demonstrating its reliable extrapolation ability not far from the training region. Compared to the model averaging method, the neural network has higher accuracy and smaller uncertainties of half-life predictions in the known region. When extrapolated to the unknown region, the half-life uncertainties of the neural network are still smaller than those of the model averaging method within about $5 - 10$ steps for nuclei with $35 \lesssim Z \lesssim 90$, while the model averaging method has smaller half-life uncertainties for nuclei near the drip line.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信