{"title":"激光共聚焦扫描显微镜观察XP-endo Finisher与被动超声激活对牙本质小管灌洗液渗透效果的比较","authors":"Ajay Singh Rao, Shreya Bhor, Unnati Shah","doi":"10.4103/endo.endo_160_21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Aim: The aim of this in vitro study was to comparatively evaluate the effectiveness of XP-endo Finisher and passive ultrasonic (PU) activation on dentinal tubule penetration of irrigation solution: A confocal laser scanning microscopy study. Materials and Methods: Forty extracted single-rooted human mandibular canines and premolars were instrumented up to size 40/06 taper and randomly divided into 2 groups (n = 20) based on the activation technique of final irrigation solution into Group A: PU activation and Group B: XP-endo Finisher activation. In each group, 5 ml of 5% NaOCl labeled with fluorescent dye was used during activation as the final irrigation solution. Specimens were sectioned at 2, 5, and 8 mm from the apex and examined under confocal microscope to calculate the dentinal tubule penetration area. Data were analyzed using Tukey’s post hoc tests ( P = 0.05). Results: PU activation exhibited a significantly higher penetration area than XP-endo Finisher activation ( P < 0.05). In addition, at coronal, middle, and apical thirds, all regions of PU activation had significantly higher penetration than XP-endo Finisher activation. Statistically significant differences were found between each root canal third (coronal > middle > apical) ( P < 0.001). Conclusion: The PU activation is more effective than XP-endo Finisher in terms of irrigant penetration into the dentinal tubules.","PeriodicalId":11607,"journal":{"name":"Endodontology","volume":"36 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative evaluation of the effectiveness of XP-endo Finisher and passive ultrasonic activation on dentinal tubule penetration of irrigation solution: A confocal laser scanning microscopy study\",\"authors\":\"Ajay Singh Rao, Shreya Bhor, Unnati Shah\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/endo.endo_160_21\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Aim: The aim of this in vitro study was to comparatively evaluate the effectiveness of XP-endo Finisher and passive ultrasonic (PU) activation on dentinal tubule penetration of irrigation solution: A confocal laser scanning microscopy study. Materials and Methods: Forty extracted single-rooted human mandibular canines and premolars were instrumented up to size 40/06 taper and randomly divided into 2 groups (n = 20) based on the activation technique of final irrigation solution into Group A: PU activation and Group B: XP-endo Finisher activation. In each group, 5 ml of 5% NaOCl labeled with fluorescent dye was used during activation as the final irrigation solution. Specimens were sectioned at 2, 5, and 8 mm from the apex and examined under confocal microscope to calculate the dentinal tubule penetration area. Data were analyzed using Tukey’s post hoc tests ( P = 0.05). Results: PU activation exhibited a significantly higher penetration area than XP-endo Finisher activation ( P < 0.05). In addition, at coronal, middle, and apical thirds, all regions of PU activation had significantly higher penetration than XP-endo Finisher activation. Statistically significant differences were found between each root canal third (coronal > middle > apical) ( P < 0.001). Conclusion: The PU activation is more effective than XP-endo Finisher in terms of irrigant penetration into the dentinal tubules.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11607,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Endodontology\",\"volume\":\"36 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Endodontology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/endo.endo_160_21\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Dentistry\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Endodontology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/endo.endo_160_21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparative evaluation of the effectiveness of XP-endo Finisher and passive ultrasonic activation on dentinal tubule penetration of irrigation solution: A confocal laser scanning microscopy study
ABSTRACT Aim: The aim of this in vitro study was to comparatively evaluate the effectiveness of XP-endo Finisher and passive ultrasonic (PU) activation on dentinal tubule penetration of irrigation solution: A confocal laser scanning microscopy study. Materials and Methods: Forty extracted single-rooted human mandibular canines and premolars were instrumented up to size 40/06 taper and randomly divided into 2 groups (n = 20) based on the activation technique of final irrigation solution into Group A: PU activation and Group B: XP-endo Finisher activation. In each group, 5 ml of 5% NaOCl labeled with fluorescent dye was used during activation as the final irrigation solution. Specimens were sectioned at 2, 5, and 8 mm from the apex and examined under confocal microscope to calculate the dentinal tubule penetration area. Data were analyzed using Tukey’s post hoc tests ( P = 0.05). Results: PU activation exhibited a significantly higher penetration area than XP-endo Finisher activation ( P < 0.05). In addition, at coronal, middle, and apical thirds, all regions of PU activation had significantly higher penetration than XP-endo Finisher activation. Statistically significant differences were found between each root canal third (coronal > middle > apical) ( P < 0.001). Conclusion: The PU activation is more effective than XP-endo Finisher in terms of irrigant penetration into the dentinal tubules.