同心圆荷载作用下玻璃钢筋玻璃纤维混凝土桩与土工格栅的试验研究

EL Sayed A. El-kasaby, Mahmoud Awwad, Amir M. Mansour
{"title":"同心圆荷载作用下玻璃钢筋玻璃纤维混凝土桩与土工格栅的试验研究","authors":"EL Sayed A. El-kasaby, Mahmoud Awwad, Amir M. Mansour","doi":"10.22161/ijaems.99.7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In a variety of applications, glass fiber concrete has proven to be a successful substitute for supplying shear and flexural reinforcement for reinforced concrete. The mechanical properties of glass fiber concrete and steel reinforcement are different, hence the compression behavior of concrete piles reinforced with glass fiber concrete may be different from that of those reinforced with steel. However, the axial compression behavior of circular piles has not yet been established. This study assessed the concentric behavior of 12 end bearing piles with 1050 mm length and 150 mm diameter reinforced with varying amounts of glass fiber bristles (GFB), 0.75, 1.00, 1.25, and 1.50% of cement weight. The results are presented in this publication. 4 of them had no extra reinforcement (PG), 4 had glass fibre bars (GFRP) and spiral steel reinforcement (PGGB), and 4 had triaxial geogrid as reinforcement (PGG). All outcomes were contrasted with a pile that had steel reinforcement (PS). The findings demonstrated that theses composite piles increased the capacity of piles. The maximum load absorbed by the PG models under axial load was 3.54–21.43% less than the maximum load absorbed by PS. The PGGB specimen’s maximum load was 0.00–30.03 % higher than the maximum load of PS specimen. The maximum load supported by the PGG specimens under axial load was, in some cases, 5.23–18.20% less than the maximum load supported by PS, while in another case, it was 17.51% more.","PeriodicalId":424230,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Advanced engineering, Management and Science","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Experimental study of glass fiber concrete piles reinforced with GFRP bars and geogrid under concentric loads\",\"authors\":\"EL Sayed A. El-kasaby, Mahmoud Awwad, Amir M. Mansour\",\"doi\":\"10.22161/ijaems.99.7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In a variety of applications, glass fiber concrete has proven to be a successful substitute for supplying shear and flexural reinforcement for reinforced concrete. The mechanical properties of glass fiber concrete and steel reinforcement are different, hence the compression behavior of concrete piles reinforced with glass fiber concrete may be different from that of those reinforced with steel. However, the axial compression behavior of circular piles has not yet been established. This study assessed the concentric behavior of 12 end bearing piles with 1050 mm length and 150 mm diameter reinforced with varying amounts of glass fiber bristles (GFB), 0.75, 1.00, 1.25, and 1.50% of cement weight. The results are presented in this publication. 4 of them had no extra reinforcement (PG), 4 had glass fibre bars (GFRP) and spiral steel reinforcement (PGGB), and 4 had triaxial geogrid as reinforcement (PGG). All outcomes were contrasted with a pile that had steel reinforcement (PS). The findings demonstrated that theses composite piles increased the capacity of piles. The maximum load absorbed by the PG models under axial load was 3.54–21.43% less than the maximum load absorbed by PS. The PGGB specimen’s maximum load was 0.00–30.03 % higher than the maximum load of PS specimen. The maximum load supported by the PGG specimens under axial load was, in some cases, 5.23–18.20% less than the maximum load supported by PS, while in another case, it was 17.51% more.\",\"PeriodicalId\":424230,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Advanced engineering, Management and Science\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Advanced engineering, Management and Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22161/ijaems.99.7\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Advanced engineering, Management and Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22161/ijaems.99.7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在各种应用中,玻璃纤维混凝土已被证明是为钢筋混凝土提供抗剪和抗弯钢筋的成功替代品。由于玻璃纤维混凝土和钢筋的力学性能不同,因此玻璃纤维混凝土加固的混凝土桩的抗压性能可能与钢筋加固的混凝土桩不同。然而,圆桩的轴压特性尚未建立。本研究评估了12根长度为1050 mm、直径为150 mm的端承桩的同心性能,分别用水泥重量的0.75、1.00、1.25和1.50%的不同数量的玻璃纤维刷毛(GFB)加固。研究结果发表在本出版物中。其中4座不加筋(PG), 4座玻璃钢筋(GFRP)加螺旋钢筋(PGGB), 4座三轴土工格栅加筋(PGG)。所有结果都与钢筋桩(PS)进行对比。结果表明,复合桩提高了桩的承载力。在轴向荷载作用下,PG模型的最大吸收荷载比PS模型的最大吸收荷载低3.54 ~ 21.43%,PGGB模型的最大吸收荷载比PS模型的最大吸收荷载高0.00% ~ 30.03%。在轴向荷载作用下,PGG试件所承受的最大载荷有的比PS试件所承受的最大载荷小5.23 ~ 18.20%,有的比PS试件所承受的最大载荷大17.51%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Experimental study of glass fiber concrete piles reinforced with GFRP bars and geogrid under concentric loads
In a variety of applications, glass fiber concrete has proven to be a successful substitute for supplying shear and flexural reinforcement for reinforced concrete. The mechanical properties of glass fiber concrete and steel reinforcement are different, hence the compression behavior of concrete piles reinforced with glass fiber concrete may be different from that of those reinforced with steel. However, the axial compression behavior of circular piles has not yet been established. This study assessed the concentric behavior of 12 end bearing piles with 1050 mm length and 150 mm diameter reinforced with varying amounts of glass fiber bristles (GFB), 0.75, 1.00, 1.25, and 1.50% of cement weight. The results are presented in this publication. 4 of them had no extra reinforcement (PG), 4 had glass fibre bars (GFRP) and spiral steel reinforcement (PGGB), and 4 had triaxial geogrid as reinforcement (PGG). All outcomes were contrasted with a pile that had steel reinforcement (PS). The findings demonstrated that theses composite piles increased the capacity of piles. The maximum load absorbed by the PG models under axial load was 3.54–21.43% less than the maximum load absorbed by PS. The PGGB specimen’s maximum load was 0.00–30.03 % higher than the maximum load of PS specimen. The maximum load supported by the PGG specimens under axial load was, in some cases, 5.23–18.20% less than the maximum load supported by PS, while in another case, it was 17.51% more.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信