菲律宾一家三级医院护士工作相关的生活质量和绩效评估

Q4 Nursing
AlvinDuke R. Sy, MaKrisstella D. Gonzales, RachelCamille C. Rodriguez
{"title":"菲律宾一家三级医院护士工作相关的生活质量和绩效评估","authors":"AlvinDuke R. Sy, MaKrisstella D. Gonzales, RachelCamille C. Rodriguez","doi":"10.4103/jin.jin_7_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: The objective of the study is to describe the work-related quality of life (WRQOL) among nurses and explore its association with performance evaluation ratings. Methods: A cross-sectional design was utilized measuring the WRQOL scale and the previous performance appraisal rating. Multistage sampling approach was utilized with nurses stratified based on their position and then systematically random sampled based on their unit assignment. Results: One hundred and eighty-two nurses were included. About half reported a high quality of work life (101; 55.5%). Low scores were noted on the subscale working conditions (100; 54.9%), low to average responses for home-work interface (109; 59.9%), control at work (100; 54.9%), and stress at work (90; 49.5%). A higher proportion of nurses reported positive responses toward the areas of general well-being (113; 62.1%) and job-career satisfaction (112; 61.5%), than in the other subscales. There were notable differences between WRQOL ratings: (1) Head nurses had the highest perceived quality of work life, followed by nurse supervisors and charge nurses (F = 6.1, P < 0.01) and (2) Nurses in the pay-patient services reported lower quality of working life, while those in office and outpatient services had more positive scores (F = 4.6, P < 0.01). Conclusion: Only more than half of the nurses reported a high quality of work life, some of its dimensions, particularly job and career satisfaction and working conditions, appeared to vary in the perceived degree across years in service, work hours, and position. The assessment of the quality of work life may serve as an important tool to address staff burnout, absenteeism and other issues that affect job performance among health-care professionals.","PeriodicalId":34651,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Integrative Nursing","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Work-related quality of life and performance appraisal among nurses at a tertiary hospital in Philippines\",\"authors\":\"AlvinDuke R. Sy, MaKrisstella D. Gonzales, RachelCamille C. Rodriguez\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/jin.jin_7_23\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: The objective of the study is to describe the work-related quality of life (WRQOL) among nurses and explore its association with performance evaluation ratings. Methods: A cross-sectional design was utilized measuring the WRQOL scale and the previous performance appraisal rating. Multistage sampling approach was utilized with nurses stratified based on their position and then systematically random sampled based on their unit assignment. Results: One hundred and eighty-two nurses were included. About half reported a high quality of work life (101; 55.5%). Low scores were noted on the subscale working conditions (100; 54.9%), low to average responses for home-work interface (109; 59.9%), control at work (100; 54.9%), and stress at work (90; 49.5%). A higher proportion of nurses reported positive responses toward the areas of general well-being (113; 62.1%) and job-career satisfaction (112; 61.5%), than in the other subscales. There were notable differences between WRQOL ratings: (1) Head nurses had the highest perceived quality of work life, followed by nurse supervisors and charge nurses (F = 6.1, P < 0.01) and (2) Nurses in the pay-patient services reported lower quality of working life, while those in office and outpatient services had more positive scores (F = 4.6, P < 0.01). Conclusion: Only more than half of the nurses reported a high quality of work life, some of its dimensions, particularly job and career satisfaction and working conditions, appeared to vary in the perceived degree across years in service, work hours, and position. The assessment of the quality of work life may serve as an important tool to address staff burnout, absenteeism and other issues that affect job performance among health-care professionals.\",\"PeriodicalId\":34651,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Integrative Nursing\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Integrative Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/jin.jin_7_23\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Nursing\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Integrative Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jin.jin_7_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究的目的是描述护士工作相关生活质量(WRQOL),并探讨其与绩效评估评分的关系。方法:采用横断面设计测量WRQOL量表和以往绩效评价评分。采用多阶段抽样方法,按护士岗位分层,按单位分配系统随机抽样。结果:共纳入182名护士。大约一半的人认为自己的工作生活质量很高(101;55.5%)。工作条件分量表得分较低(100分;54.9%),对家庭工作界面的反应低于平均水平(109;59.9%),工作控制(100;54.9%),以及工作压力(90;49.5%)。较高比例的护士报告了对一般福祉领域的积极反应(113;62.1%)和工作-职业满意度(112;61.5%),高于其他量表。WRQOL评分的差异有统计学意义:(1)护士长对工作生活质量的感知最高,其次是护士长和护士长(F = 6.1, P < 0.01);(2)收费门诊护士对工作生活质量的感知得分较低,办公室和门诊护士的感知得分较高(F = 4.6, P < 0.01)。结论:只有一半以上的护士报告了高质量的工作生活,其一些维度,特别是工作和职业满意度和工作条件,在服务年限、工作时间和职位的感知程度上有所不同。对工作生活质量的评估可作为解决工作人员倦怠、缺勤和影响保健专业人员工作绩效的其他问题的重要工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Work-related quality of life and performance appraisal among nurses at a tertiary hospital in Philippines
Objective: The objective of the study is to describe the work-related quality of life (WRQOL) among nurses and explore its association with performance evaluation ratings. Methods: A cross-sectional design was utilized measuring the WRQOL scale and the previous performance appraisal rating. Multistage sampling approach was utilized with nurses stratified based on their position and then systematically random sampled based on their unit assignment. Results: One hundred and eighty-two nurses were included. About half reported a high quality of work life (101; 55.5%). Low scores were noted on the subscale working conditions (100; 54.9%), low to average responses for home-work interface (109; 59.9%), control at work (100; 54.9%), and stress at work (90; 49.5%). A higher proportion of nurses reported positive responses toward the areas of general well-being (113; 62.1%) and job-career satisfaction (112; 61.5%), than in the other subscales. There were notable differences between WRQOL ratings: (1) Head nurses had the highest perceived quality of work life, followed by nurse supervisors and charge nurses (F = 6.1, P < 0.01) and (2) Nurses in the pay-patient services reported lower quality of working life, while those in office and outpatient services had more positive scores (F = 4.6, P < 0.01). Conclusion: Only more than half of the nurses reported a high quality of work life, some of its dimensions, particularly job and career satisfaction and working conditions, appeared to vary in the perceived degree across years in service, work hours, and position. The assessment of the quality of work life may serve as an important tool to address staff burnout, absenteeism and other issues that affect job performance among health-care professionals.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Integrative Nursing
Journal of Integrative Nursing Nursing-General Nursing
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
3
审稿时长
17 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信