“监管灰色地带”:执法部门对无家可归者和空间的管理

IF 2 2区 社会学 Q1 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY
Natasha Martino, C. B. Sanders, E. Dej
{"title":"“监管灰色地带”:执法部门对无家可归者和空间的管理","authors":"Natasha Martino, C. B. Sanders, E. Dej","doi":"10.1080/10439463.2023.2263617","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTOver the past two decades, homelessness has become more visible, and with it are increased demands for law enforcement to minimise the visibility of people experiencing homelessness, and manage, or ultimately remove, local encampments. While scholarship exists on police responses to homelessness, the role that other security actors, such as municipal bylaw officers, play in managing and regulating homelessness is largely unknown. In this paper, we explore municipal bylaw officers’ perceptions of their roles and responsibilities related to homelessness in Ontario, Canada. Our analysis reveals how bylaw officers have become important players in the security governance of homelessness. We demonstrate how bylaw officers’ policies, which focus on the regulation of space, are loosely coupled with, or disconnected from, their frontline activities, which require the regulation of people. This loose coupling situates bylaw officers in a perceived regulatory grey zone, requiring them to use discretionary solutions informed by their subjective experiences to govern people experiencing homelessness. The reliance on subjectivity and discretion expands security networks regulating and governing people experiencing homelessness.KEYWORDS: Homelessnesspolicingdiscretionsecurity networks Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 2SLGBTQQIA+ is an acronym that recognises and honours the experiences of Two-Spirit, lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, questioning, intersex, asexual, and other identities and communities.2 We express our gratitude to the reviewers for this insight.Additional informationFundingThis work was supported by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council.","PeriodicalId":47763,"journal":{"name":"Policing & Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The ‘regulatory grey zone’: bylaw enforcement’s governing of homelessness and space\",\"authors\":\"Natasha Martino, C. B. Sanders, E. Dej\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10439463.2023.2263617\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACTOver the past two decades, homelessness has become more visible, and with it are increased demands for law enforcement to minimise the visibility of people experiencing homelessness, and manage, or ultimately remove, local encampments. While scholarship exists on police responses to homelessness, the role that other security actors, such as municipal bylaw officers, play in managing and regulating homelessness is largely unknown. In this paper, we explore municipal bylaw officers’ perceptions of their roles and responsibilities related to homelessness in Ontario, Canada. Our analysis reveals how bylaw officers have become important players in the security governance of homelessness. We demonstrate how bylaw officers’ policies, which focus on the regulation of space, are loosely coupled with, or disconnected from, their frontline activities, which require the regulation of people. This loose coupling situates bylaw officers in a perceived regulatory grey zone, requiring them to use discretionary solutions informed by their subjective experiences to govern people experiencing homelessness. The reliance on subjectivity and discretion expands security networks regulating and governing people experiencing homelessness.KEYWORDS: Homelessnesspolicingdiscretionsecurity networks Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 2SLGBTQQIA+ is an acronym that recognises and honours the experiences of Two-Spirit, lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, questioning, intersex, asexual, and other identities and communities.2 We express our gratitude to the reviewers for this insight.Additional informationFundingThis work was supported by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47763,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Policing & Society\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Policing & Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10439463.2023.2263617\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Policing & Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10439463.2023.2263617","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在过去的二十年里,无家可归变得越来越明显,随之而来的是对执法部门的要求越来越高,以尽量减少无家可归者的可见性,并管理或最终拆除当地的营地。虽然有关于警察对无家可归者的反应的学术研究,但其他安全行为者,如市政执法人员,在管理和规范无家可归者方面所起的作用在很大程度上是未知的。在本文中,我们探讨了市政官员对加拿大安大略省无家可归者的角色和责任的看法。我们的分析揭示了章程官员如何成为无家可归者安全治理的重要参与者。我们展示了法规官员的政策是如何与他们的一线活动松散地结合在一起的,或者与他们的一线活动脱节的,而一线活动需要对人进行监管。这种松散的耦合将法律官员置于一个被认为是监管的灰色地带,要求他们根据自己的主观经验,使用酌情决定的解决方案来管理无家可归的人。对主观性和自由裁量权的依赖扩大了监管和管理无家可归者的安全网络。关键词:无家可归者、警务、自由裁量权、安全网络披露声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。注1 2SLGBTQQIA+是一个首字母缩略词,承认和尊重双性恋者、女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋、变性人、酷儿、质疑者、双性人、无性恋者和其他身份和社区的经历我们对审稿人的洞察力表示感谢。本研究得到了社会科学与人文研究委员会的支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The ‘regulatory grey zone’: bylaw enforcement’s governing of homelessness and space
ABSTRACTOver the past two decades, homelessness has become more visible, and with it are increased demands for law enforcement to minimise the visibility of people experiencing homelessness, and manage, or ultimately remove, local encampments. While scholarship exists on police responses to homelessness, the role that other security actors, such as municipal bylaw officers, play in managing and regulating homelessness is largely unknown. In this paper, we explore municipal bylaw officers’ perceptions of their roles and responsibilities related to homelessness in Ontario, Canada. Our analysis reveals how bylaw officers have become important players in the security governance of homelessness. We demonstrate how bylaw officers’ policies, which focus on the regulation of space, are loosely coupled with, or disconnected from, their frontline activities, which require the regulation of people. This loose coupling situates bylaw officers in a perceived regulatory grey zone, requiring them to use discretionary solutions informed by their subjective experiences to govern people experiencing homelessness. The reliance on subjectivity and discretion expands security networks regulating and governing people experiencing homelessness.KEYWORDS: Homelessnesspolicingdiscretionsecurity networks Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 2SLGBTQQIA+ is an acronym that recognises and honours the experiences of Two-Spirit, lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, questioning, intersex, asexual, and other identities and communities.2 We express our gratitude to the reviewers for this insight.Additional informationFundingThis work was supported by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Policing & Society
Policing & Society CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
7.40%
发文量
50
期刊介绍: Policing & Society is widely acknowledged as the leading international academic journal specialising in the study of policing institutions and their practices. It is concerned with all aspects of how policing articulates and animates the social contexts in which it is located. This includes: • Social scientific investigations of police policy and activity • Legal and political analyses of police powers and governance • Management oriented research on aspects of police organisation Space is also devoted to the relationship between what the police do and the policing decisions and functions of communities, private sector organisations and other state agencies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信