抗微生物药物的临床药理学:以万古霉素和利奈唑胺的安全性为重点

M. V. Zhuravleva, E. V. Kuznetsova, N. G. Berdnikova, A. B. Prokofiev, T. R. Kameneva, E. Yu. Demchenkova
{"title":"抗微生物药物的临床药理学:以万古霉素和利奈唑胺的安全性为重点","authors":"M. V. Zhuravleva, E. V. Kuznetsova, N. G. Berdnikova, A. B. Prokofiev, T. R. Kameneva, E. Yu. Demchenkova","doi":"10.30895/2312-7821-2023-337","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Scientific relevance. Vancomycin and linezolid are the antibacterial agents of choice for severe infections caused by multidrug-resistant pathogens, including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). However, few studies have been conducted in Russia to analyse the safety of these medicinal products. Aim. The study aimed to compare the safety of vancomycin and linezolid using the Moscow segment of the Russian Federal Service for Surveillance in Healthcare’s database for adverse drug reaction (ADR) reports. Materials and methods. The study used information from the spontaneous reporting database for 2018–2022, which contained 147 ADR reports for vancomycin (122 reports) and linezolid (25 reports). The authors analysed the ADR distribution and assessed the statistical significance of the identified differences by sex, weight, and age of patients, conditions of medical care, route of administration, single dose, daily dose, therapy duration, ICD-10 codes, ADR severity, and ADR outcome. Results. The distribution of adverse reactions to vancomycin and linezolid by patient age was relatively uniform. Outpatient linezolid was associated with a significantly higher rate of ADRs (3 of 5 reports) than outpatient vancomycin (21 of 129 reports; p =0.0408). For ADR severity, 5 of 20 ADRs reported with linezolid required hospitalisation or prolongation of hospitalisation—considerably more than with vancomycin (16 of 94 reports; p =0.528). The average single dose of vancomycin (794 mg) was higher than that of linezolid (467 mg; p =0.007); the same was noted for average daily doses (1273 mg vs 998 mg; p =0.3664). The mean duration of treatment with linezolid before ADR onset was 5.26 days, which was significantly longer than the mean duration of treatment with vancomycin (2.44 days; p =0.0053). Oral linezolid was associated with a significantly higher ADR rate (4 of 19 cases) than oral vancomycin (5 of 96 cases; p =0.0027). Conclusions. The ADRs observed with vancomycin and linezolid were predictable and class-specific. According to the results of the ADR report analysis, adverse reactions to vancomycin and linezolid were associated with different factors. Similar results of the literature analysis confirmed this conclusion. However, according to the results of the linear regression analysis, none of the factors considered in this study had a statistically significant influence on the probability of developing an adverse reaction to vancomycin or linezolid.","PeriodicalId":32736,"journal":{"name":"Bezopasnost'' i risk farmakoterapii","volume":"80 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical Pharmacology of Antimicrobials: Focus on the Safety of Vancomycin and Linezolid\",\"authors\":\"M. V. Zhuravleva, E. V. Kuznetsova, N. G. Berdnikova, A. B. Prokofiev, T. R. Kameneva, E. Yu. Demchenkova\",\"doi\":\"10.30895/2312-7821-2023-337\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Scientific relevance. Vancomycin and linezolid are the antibacterial agents of choice for severe infections caused by multidrug-resistant pathogens, including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). However, few studies have been conducted in Russia to analyse the safety of these medicinal products. Aim. The study aimed to compare the safety of vancomycin and linezolid using the Moscow segment of the Russian Federal Service for Surveillance in Healthcare’s database for adverse drug reaction (ADR) reports. Materials and methods. The study used information from the spontaneous reporting database for 2018–2022, which contained 147 ADR reports for vancomycin (122 reports) and linezolid (25 reports). The authors analysed the ADR distribution and assessed the statistical significance of the identified differences by sex, weight, and age of patients, conditions of medical care, route of administration, single dose, daily dose, therapy duration, ICD-10 codes, ADR severity, and ADR outcome. Results. The distribution of adverse reactions to vancomycin and linezolid by patient age was relatively uniform. Outpatient linezolid was associated with a significantly higher rate of ADRs (3 of 5 reports) than outpatient vancomycin (21 of 129 reports; p =0.0408). For ADR severity, 5 of 20 ADRs reported with linezolid required hospitalisation or prolongation of hospitalisation—considerably more than with vancomycin (16 of 94 reports; p =0.528). The average single dose of vancomycin (794 mg) was higher than that of linezolid (467 mg; p =0.007); the same was noted for average daily doses (1273 mg vs 998 mg; p =0.3664). The mean duration of treatment with linezolid before ADR onset was 5.26 days, which was significantly longer than the mean duration of treatment with vancomycin (2.44 days; p =0.0053). Oral linezolid was associated with a significantly higher ADR rate (4 of 19 cases) than oral vancomycin (5 of 96 cases; p =0.0027). Conclusions. The ADRs observed with vancomycin and linezolid were predictable and class-specific. According to the results of the ADR report analysis, adverse reactions to vancomycin and linezolid were associated with different factors. Similar results of the literature analysis confirmed this conclusion. However, according to the results of the linear regression analysis, none of the factors considered in this study had a statistically significant influence on the probability of developing an adverse reaction to vancomycin or linezolid.\",\"PeriodicalId\":32736,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bezopasnost'' i risk farmakoterapii\",\"volume\":\"80 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bezopasnost'' i risk farmakoterapii\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.30895/2312-7821-2023-337\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bezopasnost'' i risk farmakoterapii","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30895/2312-7821-2023-337","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

科学的相关性。万古霉素和利奈唑胺是多重耐药病原体,包括耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)引起的严重感染的首选抗菌剂。然而,在俄罗斯进行的分析这些药品安全性的研究很少。的目标。该研究的目的是比较万古霉素和利奈唑胺的安全性,使用俄罗斯联邦卫生保健监测服务数据库中的药物不良反应(ADR)报告。材料和方法。该研究使用了2018-2022年自发报告数据库中的信息,其中包含147份万古霉素(122份)和利奈唑胺(25份)的不良反应报告。作者分析了ADR的分布,并根据患者的性别、体重和年龄、医疗条件、给药途径、单次给药、日给药、治疗持续时间、ICD-10编码、ADR严重程度和ADR结局评估了已确定差异的统计学意义。结果。万古霉素和利奈唑胺不良反应按患者年龄分布较为均匀。门诊利奈唑胺的不良反应发生率(5份报告中有3份)明显高于门诊万古霉素(129份报告中有21份;p = 0.0408)。就不良反应严重程度而言,利奈唑胺20例不良反应中有5例需要住院或延长住院时间,远高于万古霉素(94例报告中有16例;p = 0.528)。万古霉素单次平均剂量(794 mg)高于利奈唑胺(467 mg);p = 0.007);平均每日剂量也是如此(1273毫克vs 998毫克;p = 0.3664)。利奈唑胺治疗前发生不良反应的平均持续时间为5.26天,明显长于万古霉素治疗的平均持续时间(2.44天;p = 0.0053)。口服利奈唑胺的不良反应发生率(19例中有4例)明显高于口服万古霉素(96例中有5例;p = 0.0027)。结论。万古霉素和利奈唑胺观察到的不良反应是可预测的和类别特异性的。根据不良反应报告分析结果,万古霉素和利奈唑胺的不良反应与不同因素有关。相似的文献分析结果证实了这一结论。然而,根据线性回归分析的结果,本研究中考虑的因素对万古霉素或利奈唑胺发生不良反应的概率没有统计学意义上的显著影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Clinical Pharmacology of Antimicrobials: Focus on the Safety of Vancomycin and Linezolid
Scientific relevance. Vancomycin and linezolid are the antibacterial agents of choice for severe infections caused by multidrug-resistant pathogens, including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). However, few studies have been conducted in Russia to analyse the safety of these medicinal products. Aim. The study aimed to compare the safety of vancomycin and linezolid using the Moscow segment of the Russian Federal Service for Surveillance in Healthcare’s database for adverse drug reaction (ADR) reports. Materials and methods. The study used information from the spontaneous reporting database for 2018–2022, which contained 147 ADR reports for vancomycin (122 reports) and linezolid (25 reports). The authors analysed the ADR distribution and assessed the statistical significance of the identified differences by sex, weight, and age of patients, conditions of medical care, route of administration, single dose, daily dose, therapy duration, ICD-10 codes, ADR severity, and ADR outcome. Results. The distribution of adverse reactions to vancomycin and linezolid by patient age was relatively uniform. Outpatient linezolid was associated with a significantly higher rate of ADRs (3 of 5 reports) than outpatient vancomycin (21 of 129 reports; p =0.0408). For ADR severity, 5 of 20 ADRs reported with linezolid required hospitalisation or prolongation of hospitalisation—considerably more than with vancomycin (16 of 94 reports; p =0.528). The average single dose of vancomycin (794 mg) was higher than that of linezolid (467 mg; p =0.007); the same was noted for average daily doses (1273 mg vs 998 mg; p =0.3664). The mean duration of treatment with linezolid before ADR onset was 5.26 days, which was significantly longer than the mean duration of treatment with vancomycin (2.44 days; p =0.0053). Oral linezolid was associated with a significantly higher ADR rate (4 of 19 cases) than oral vancomycin (5 of 96 cases; p =0.0027). Conclusions. The ADRs observed with vancomycin and linezolid were predictable and class-specific. According to the results of the ADR report analysis, adverse reactions to vancomycin and linezolid were associated with different factors. Similar results of the literature analysis confirmed this conclusion. However, according to the results of the linear regression analysis, none of the factors considered in this study had a statistically significant influence on the probability of developing an adverse reaction to vancomycin or linezolid.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
30
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信