学科背景和学生身份对远程学习经验的重要性:来自2019冠状病毒病大流行的教训

Sean Haughey
{"title":"学科背景和学生身份对远程学习经验的重要性:来自2019冠状病毒病大流行的教训","authors":"Sean Haughey","doi":"10.3828/dap.2023.14","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Covid-19 precipitated a rapid transition from face-to-face to remote learning in higher education. Although research has considered student experiences of this transition, much of the scholarship is discipline-specific, with less written from a cross-disciplinary perspective. This study compares the remote-learning experiences of students enrolled on different degree programmes at the University of Liverpool, including both traditional and non-traditional (or ‘mature’) students. A survey (n=121) completed by undergraduate students studying ‘hard’ and applied sciences (n=63) and the humanities and social sciences (n=58) reveals important disciplinary differences in student experiences. Mature students are found to be disproportionately affected by barriers to learning. Disciplinary differences also emerge in terms of staff approaches to online teaching. The findings underscore the importance of acknowledging disciplinary context and student status when planning for remote learning and offer empirical support for the University of Liverpool’s Hybrid Active Learning model.This article was published open access under a CC BY licence: https://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0.","PeriodicalId":491202,"journal":{"name":"Developing academic practice","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The significance of disciplinary context and student status to experiences of remote learning: Lessons from the Covid-19 pandemic\",\"authors\":\"Sean Haughey\",\"doi\":\"10.3828/dap.2023.14\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Covid-19 precipitated a rapid transition from face-to-face to remote learning in higher education. Although research has considered student experiences of this transition, much of the scholarship is discipline-specific, with less written from a cross-disciplinary perspective. This study compares the remote-learning experiences of students enrolled on different degree programmes at the University of Liverpool, including both traditional and non-traditional (or ‘mature’) students. A survey (n=121) completed by undergraduate students studying ‘hard’ and applied sciences (n=63) and the humanities and social sciences (n=58) reveals important disciplinary differences in student experiences. Mature students are found to be disproportionately affected by barriers to learning. Disciplinary differences also emerge in terms of staff approaches to online teaching. The findings underscore the importance of acknowledging disciplinary context and student status when planning for remote learning and offer empirical support for the University of Liverpool’s Hybrid Active Learning model.This article was published open access under a CC BY licence: https://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0.\",\"PeriodicalId\":491202,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Developing academic practice\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Developing academic practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3828/dap.2023.14\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Developing academic practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3828/dap.2023.14","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2019冠状病毒病促使高等教育从面对面学习迅速转变为远程学习。尽管研究考虑了学生在这一转变中的经历,但大部分奖学金都是针对学科的,很少有跨学科的观点。这项研究比较了利物浦大学不同学位课程的学生的远程学习经历,包括传统和非传统(或“成熟”)学生。一项由“努力”学习应用科学(63)和人文社会科学(58)的本科生完成的调查(n=121)揭示了学生经历中重要的学科差异。研究发现,成年学生受到学习障碍的影响尤为严重。学科差异也出现在教职员工对在线教学的态度上。研究结果强调了在规划远程学习时承认学科背景和学生身份的重要性,并为利物浦大学的混合主动学习模式提供了实证支持。本文以CC BY许可方式发布:https://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The significance of disciplinary context and student status to experiences of remote learning: Lessons from the Covid-19 pandemic
Covid-19 precipitated a rapid transition from face-to-face to remote learning in higher education. Although research has considered student experiences of this transition, much of the scholarship is discipline-specific, with less written from a cross-disciplinary perspective. This study compares the remote-learning experiences of students enrolled on different degree programmes at the University of Liverpool, including both traditional and non-traditional (or ‘mature’) students. A survey (n=121) completed by undergraduate students studying ‘hard’ and applied sciences (n=63) and the humanities and social sciences (n=58) reveals important disciplinary differences in student experiences. Mature students are found to be disproportionately affected by barriers to learning. Disciplinary differences also emerge in terms of staff approaches to online teaching. The findings underscore the importance of acknowledging disciplinary context and student status when planning for remote learning and offer empirical support for the University of Liverpool’s Hybrid Active Learning model.This article was published open access under a CC BY licence: https://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信