将包容性付诸实践:城市专业人员如何在边缘化社区形成参与式治理方法

IF 1.8 4区 经济学 Q2 URBAN STUDIES
Simone van de Wetering, Martijn Groenleer
{"title":"将包容性付诸实践:城市专业人员如何在边缘化社区形成参与式治理方法","authors":"Simone van de Wetering, Martijn Groenleer","doi":"10.1080/17535069.2023.2260355","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article asks how urban professionals put inclusion into practice as they realize participatory governance in marginalized neighborhoods. Our ethnographic study shows that professionals focused their work practice on the process of inclusion; a prioritization legitimized by the underlying assumption that an ‘inclusive’ process would lead to the envisioned outcomes. This, while citizens were not always included, inclusion appeared to be about including urban professionals as well, and it was not yet clear what outcomes were reached. These insights develop existing knowledge on the work of urban professionals, particularly as they deal with coexisting rationales for inclusion.","PeriodicalId":46604,"journal":{"name":"Urban Research & Practice","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Putting inclusion into practice: how urban professionals give shape to participatory governance approaches in marginalized neighborhoods\",\"authors\":\"Simone van de Wetering, Martijn Groenleer\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17535069.2023.2260355\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article asks how urban professionals put inclusion into practice as they realize participatory governance in marginalized neighborhoods. Our ethnographic study shows that professionals focused their work practice on the process of inclusion; a prioritization legitimized by the underlying assumption that an ‘inclusive’ process would lead to the envisioned outcomes. This, while citizens were not always included, inclusion appeared to be about including urban professionals as well, and it was not yet clear what outcomes were reached. These insights develop existing knowledge on the work of urban professionals, particularly as they deal with coexisting rationales for inclusion.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46604,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Urban Research & Practice\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Urban Research & Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17535069.2023.2260355\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"URBAN STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urban Research & Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17535069.2023.2260355","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"URBAN STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文探讨城市专业人士在边缘化社区实现参与式治理时如何将包容性付诸实践。我们的民族志研究表明,专业人士将他们的工作实践集中在包容的过程上;这种优先顺序是通过一个“包容性”的过程将导致预期结果的基本假设而合法化的。虽然公民并不总是包括在内,但纳入似乎也包括城市专业人员,目前尚不清楚取得了什么结果。这些见解发展了关于城市专业人员工作的现有知识,特别是当他们处理包容性共存的基本原理时。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Putting inclusion into practice: how urban professionals give shape to participatory governance approaches in marginalized neighborhoods
This article asks how urban professionals put inclusion into practice as they realize participatory governance in marginalized neighborhoods. Our ethnographic study shows that professionals focused their work practice on the process of inclusion; a prioritization legitimized by the underlying assumption that an ‘inclusive’ process would lead to the envisioned outcomes. This, while citizens were not always included, inclusion appeared to be about including urban professionals as well, and it was not yet clear what outcomes were reached. These insights develop existing knowledge on the work of urban professionals, particularly as they deal with coexisting rationales for inclusion.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Urban Research & Practice
Urban Research & Practice URBAN STUDIES-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
4.80%
发文量
47
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信