医生参与质量改进:一项横断面研究

Christine Shea, Laure Perrier, Melissa Prokopy, Monique Herbert, Sundeep Sodhi, Alia Karsan, Julie Simard, Tyrone Perreira
{"title":"医生参与质量改进:一项横断面研究","authors":"Christine Shea, Laure Perrier, Melissa Prokopy, Monique Herbert, Sundeep Sodhi, Alia Karsan, Julie Simard, Tyrone Perreira","doi":"10.5430/jha.v12n2p22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: The positive impact of quality improvement (QI) on organizational and system outcomes has the potential to contribute to a high-performing health system. Physician engagement in QI has been linked to the success and sustainability of improvement initiatives. An informed overview of physicians’ interests in QI, opportunities to be involved in QI efforts, and insights into physicians’ experiences of participation, both in hospital and general practice is critical to understanding the challenges and opportunities for physician engagement in QI. The purpose of this study was to gain insight into both the number of physicians currently trained and participating in QI and identify key barriers preventing physicians from being trained and participating in QI.Methods: A cross-sectional online survey was used to evaluate physician engagement in QI. A total of 231 physicians across Ontario, Canada, participated in the study.Results: Results indicate that leadership should continue to make Quality Improvement (QI) training opportunities available to physicians.Conclusions: If more physicians are to be engaged in QI, there is a need to clearly identify and communicate opportunities for QI projects.","PeriodicalId":15872,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hospital Administration","volume":"91 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Physician engagement in quality improvement: A cross-sectional study\",\"authors\":\"Christine Shea, Laure Perrier, Melissa Prokopy, Monique Herbert, Sundeep Sodhi, Alia Karsan, Julie Simard, Tyrone Perreira\",\"doi\":\"10.5430/jha.v12n2p22\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: The positive impact of quality improvement (QI) on organizational and system outcomes has the potential to contribute to a high-performing health system. Physician engagement in QI has been linked to the success and sustainability of improvement initiatives. An informed overview of physicians’ interests in QI, opportunities to be involved in QI efforts, and insights into physicians’ experiences of participation, both in hospital and general practice is critical to understanding the challenges and opportunities for physician engagement in QI. The purpose of this study was to gain insight into both the number of physicians currently trained and participating in QI and identify key barriers preventing physicians from being trained and participating in QI.Methods: A cross-sectional online survey was used to evaluate physician engagement in QI. A total of 231 physicians across Ontario, Canada, participated in the study.Results: Results indicate that leadership should continue to make Quality Improvement (QI) training opportunities available to physicians.Conclusions: If more physicians are to be engaged in QI, there is a need to clearly identify and communicate opportunities for QI projects.\",\"PeriodicalId\":15872,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Hospital Administration\",\"volume\":\"91 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Hospital Administration\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5430/jha.v12n2p22\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hospital Administration","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5430/jha.v12n2p22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:质量改进(QI)对组织和系统结果的积极影响具有促进高绩效卫生系统的潜力。医生对QI的参与与改善计划的成功和可持续性有关。了解医生对QI的兴趣,参与QI工作的机会,以及医生在医院和全科实践中参与QI的经验,对于理解医生参与QI的挑战和机遇至关重要。本研究的目的是深入了解目前接受培训和参与QI的医生数量,并确定阻碍医生接受培训和参与QI的主要障碍。方法:采用横断面在线调查来评估医师对气的参与程度。加拿大安大略省共有231名医生参与了这项研究。结果:结果表明,领导应继续为医生提供质量改进(QI)培训的机会。结论:如果要让更多的医生参与到QI项目中,就需要明确识别和沟通QI项目的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Physician engagement in quality improvement: A cross-sectional study
Objective: The positive impact of quality improvement (QI) on organizational and system outcomes has the potential to contribute to a high-performing health system. Physician engagement in QI has been linked to the success and sustainability of improvement initiatives. An informed overview of physicians’ interests in QI, opportunities to be involved in QI efforts, and insights into physicians’ experiences of participation, both in hospital and general practice is critical to understanding the challenges and opportunities for physician engagement in QI. The purpose of this study was to gain insight into both the number of physicians currently trained and participating in QI and identify key barriers preventing physicians from being trained and participating in QI.Methods: A cross-sectional online survey was used to evaluate physician engagement in QI. A total of 231 physicians across Ontario, Canada, participated in the study.Results: Results indicate that leadership should continue to make Quality Improvement (QI) training opportunities available to physicians.Conclusions: If more physicians are to be engaged in QI, there is a need to clearly identify and communicate opportunities for QI projects.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信