重型外伤性脑损伤患者颅内压监测:一项配对分析的队列研究

IF 0.1 Q4 SURGERY
Gabriel Saboia de Araújo Torres, Wellingson Silva Paiva, Robson Luís Oliveira de Amorim
{"title":"重型外伤性脑损伤患者颅内压监测:一项配对分析的队列研究","authors":"Gabriel Saboia de Araújo Torres, Wellingson Silva Paiva, Robson Luís Oliveira de Amorim","doi":"10.1055/s-0041-1731012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Introduction Intracranial hypertension continues to be the most frequent cause of death in patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI). Thus, invasive monitoring of intracranial pressure (ICP) is a very important tool in neurointensivism. However, there is controversy regarding ICP monitoring and prognosis. Objectives To evaluate whether there is a difference in mortality between patients with severe TBI who underwent invasive ICP monitoring compared with those who did not undergo such procedure. Methodology This is a unicentric study in the prospective cohort mode. A total of 316 patients with severe TBI were evaluated and, out of these 316 individuals, 35 were submitted to ICP monitoring. All clinical data were evaluated by the Tertiary Hospital Neurosurgery team in the city of São Paulo. Results Of the total cohort, 35 (11%) patients underwent ICP monitoring, while 281 did not. Comparing the 2 groups, there was no difference in terms of early mortality between patients who were submitted to monitoring and those who were not (34.3 versus 14.3%; p = 0.09); there was also no difference in terms of hospital mortality (40 versus 28.5%; p = 0.31) or intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay (16.10 days, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 10.6–21.6; versus 20.60 days, 95%CI: 13.50–27.70; p = 0.31). Conclusions In this cohort, we did not identify differences in mortality or in duration of hospitalization between patients with ICP monitoring and those exclusively with clinical-radiological evaluation. However, further national co-operative studies of services using ICP monitoring are needed to achieve results with greater generalization power.","PeriodicalId":42205,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian Neurosurgery-Arquivos Brasileiros de Neurocirurgia","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intracranial Pressure Monitoring in Patients with Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: A Cohort Study with Paired Analysis\",\"authors\":\"Gabriel Saboia de Araújo Torres, Wellingson Silva Paiva, Robson Luís Oliveira de Amorim\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/s-0041-1731012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Introduction Intracranial hypertension continues to be the most frequent cause of death in patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI). Thus, invasive monitoring of intracranial pressure (ICP) is a very important tool in neurointensivism. However, there is controversy regarding ICP monitoring and prognosis. Objectives To evaluate whether there is a difference in mortality between patients with severe TBI who underwent invasive ICP monitoring compared with those who did not undergo such procedure. Methodology This is a unicentric study in the prospective cohort mode. A total of 316 patients with severe TBI were evaluated and, out of these 316 individuals, 35 were submitted to ICP monitoring. All clinical data were evaluated by the Tertiary Hospital Neurosurgery team in the city of São Paulo. Results Of the total cohort, 35 (11%) patients underwent ICP monitoring, while 281 did not. Comparing the 2 groups, there was no difference in terms of early mortality between patients who were submitted to monitoring and those who were not (34.3 versus 14.3%; p = 0.09); there was also no difference in terms of hospital mortality (40 versus 28.5%; p = 0.31) or intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay (16.10 days, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 10.6–21.6; versus 20.60 days, 95%CI: 13.50–27.70; p = 0.31). Conclusions In this cohort, we did not identify differences in mortality or in duration of hospitalization between patients with ICP monitoring and those exclusively with clinical-radiological evaluation. However, further national co-operative studies of services using ICP monitoring are needed to achieve results with greater generalization power.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42205,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Brazilian Neurosurgery-Arquivos Brasileiros de Neurocirurgia\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Brazilian Neurosurgery-Arquivos Brasileiros de Neurocirurgia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1731012\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brazilian Neurosurgery-Arquivos Brasileiros de Neurocirurgia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1731012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

颅内高压仍然是外伤性脑损伤(TBI)患者最常见的死亡原因。因此,有创监测颅内压(ICP)是神经强化治疗中非常重要的工具。然而,关于颅内压监测和预后存在争议。目的评价重度脑外伤患者行有创颅内压监测与未行有创颅内压监测的死亡率是否存在差异。这是一项前瞻性队列模式的单中心研究。对316例重度脑外伤患者进行了评估,其中35例接受了颅内压监测。所有临床数据均由圣保罗市第三医院神经外科团队评估。结果在整个队列中,35例(11%)患者进行了ICP监测,281例未进行ICP监测。比较两组,接受监测的患者和未接受监测的患者的早期死亡率没有差异(34.3 vs 14.3%;P = 0.09);在医院死亡率方面也没有差异(40%对28.5%;p = 0.31)或重症监护病房(ICU)住院时间(16.10天,95%可信区间[CI]: 10.6-21.6;对比20.60天,95%CI: 13.50-27.70;P = 0.31)。结论:在这个队列中,我们没有发现进行ICP监测的患者和仅进行临床放射学评估的患者在死亡率或住院时间上的差异。但是,需要对利用国际比较方案监测的服务进行进一步的国家合作研究,以取得具有更大推广能力的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Intracranial Pressure Monitoring in Patients with Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: A Cohort Study with Paired Analysis
Abstract Introduction Intracranial hypertension continues to be the most frequent cause of death in patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI). Thus, invasive monitoring of intracranial pressure (ICP) is a very important tool in neurointensivism. However, there is controversy regarding ICP monitoring and prognosis. Objectives To evaluate whether there is a difference in mortality between patients with severe TBI who underwent invasive ICP monitoring compared with those who did not undergo such procedure. Methodology This is a unicentric study in the prospective cohort mode. A total of 316 patients with severe TBI were evaluated and, out of these 316 individuals, 35 were submitted to ICP monitoring. All clinical data were evaluated by the Tertiary Hospital Neurosurgery team in the city of São Paulo. Results Of the total cohort, 35 (11%) patients underwent ICP monitoring, while 281 did not. Comparing the 2 groups, there was no difference in terms of early mortality between patients who were submitted to monitoring and those who were not (34.3 versus 14.3%; p = 0.09); there was also no difference in terms of hospital mortality (40 versus 28.5%; p = 0.31) or intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay (16.10 days, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 10.6–21.6; versus 20.60 days, 95%CI: 13.50–27.70; p = 0.31). Conclusions In this cohort, we did not identify differences in mortality or in duration of hospitalization between patients with ICP monitoring and those exclusively with clinical-radiological evaluation. However, further national co-operative studies of services using ICP monitoring are needed to achieve results with greater generalization power.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
68
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信